Second Department of Surgery, School of Medicine, Wakayama Medical University, 811-1 Kimiidera, Wakayama, 641-8510, Japan.
Department of Gastroenterological Surgery, Aichi Cancer Center Hospital, Aichi, Japan.
J Gastroenterol. 2020 Jan;55(1):86-99. doi: 10.1007/s00535-019-01617-2. Epub 2019 Aug 28.
Although there are numerous reports focusing on surgical indication for intraductal papillary mucinous neoplasm (IPMN), the recurrence patterns following surgery are less widely reported. To ascertain optimal treatment and postoperative surveillance for IPMN patients, we analyzed patterns and risk factors for recurrence after surgery for IPMN.
This study is a retrospective, multi-institutional, observational study, including 1074 patients undergoing surgery for IPMN at 11 academic institutions. We analyzed the risk factors for recurrence after classifying postoperative recurrences into metachronous high-risk lesions (malignant progression of IPMN and/or metachronous pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma) in the remnant pancreas and extra-pancreatic recurrence.
Of 1074 patients undergoing surgery for IPMN, 155 patients (14.4%) developed postoperative recurrence. We found that 34.3% of 70 high-risk lesions in the remnant pancreas occurred over 5 years after surgery, and survival of 36 patients undergoing second operation for high-risk lesions was better than that of 34 patients who did not (P = 0.04). We found four independent risk factors for metachronous high-risk lesions in remnant pancreas: symptoms [P = 0.005, hazard ratio (HR) 1.988], location of pancreatic body/tail (P < 0.001, HR 3.876), main duct size ≥ 10 mm (P = 0.021, HR 1.900), and high-grade dysplasia/invasive intraductal papillary mucinous carcinoma (IPMC) (P < 0.001, HR 3.204). Although six patients (0.7%) with low- or high-grade dysplasia IPMN developed extra-pancreatic recurrence, invasive IPMC was the strongest risk factor for extra-pancreatic recurrence (P < 0.001, HR 39.667).
We suggest that life-time continuous surveillance might be necessary for IPMN patients. Second surgery for metachronous high-risk lesions in remnant pancreas should be considered to improve survival.
尽管有许多关于胰管内乳头状黏液性肿瘤(IPMN)手术适应证的报道,但术后复发模式的报道却较少。为了确定 IPMN 患者的最佳治疗和术后监测方案,我们分析了 IPMN 手术后复发的模式和危险因素。
这是一项回顾性的、多机构的观察性研究,共纳入 11 家学术机构的 1074 例行 IPMN 手术的患者。我们通过将术后复发分为残胰腺内的同时发生的高危病变(IPMN 的恶性进展和/或同时发生的胰腺导管腺癌)和胰腺外复发,分析了复发的危险因素。
在 1074 例行 IPMN 手术的患者中,有 155 例(14.4%)发生了术后复发。我们发现,70 例残胰腺内高危病变中有 34.3%是在手术后 5 年内发生的,并且对高危病变进行二次手术的 36 例患者的生存率优于未进行手术的 34 例患者(P=0.04)。我们发现,残胰腺内同时发生的高危病变有四个独立的危险因素:症状(P=0.005,HR 1.988)、胰体/尾部位置(P<0.001,HR 3.876)、主胰管直径≥10mm(P=0.021,HR 1.900)和高级别异型增生/浸润性胰管内乳头状黏液性癌(IPMC)(P<0.001,HR 3.204)。尽管 6 例(0.7%)低级别或高级别异型增生 IPMN 患者发生了胰腺外复发,但浸润性 IPMC 是胰腺外复发的最强危险因素(P<0.001,HR 39.667)。
我们建议,对 IPMN 患者可能需要终生持续监测。对于残胰腺内同时发生的高危病变,应考虑进行二次手术以提高生存率。