Hirono Seiko, Higuchi Ryota, Honda Goro, Nara Satoshi, Esaki Minoru, Gotohda Naoto, Takami Hideki, Unno Michiaki, Sugiura Teiichi, Ohtsuka Masayuki, Shimizu Yasuhiro, Matsumoto Ippei, Kin Toshifumi, Isayama Hiroyuki, Hashimoto Daisuke, Seyama Yasuji, Nagano Hiroaki, Hakamada Kenichi, Hirano Satoshi, Nagakawa Yuichi, Mizuno Shugo, Takahashi Hidenori, Shibuya Kazuto, Sasanuma Hideki, Aoki Taku, Kohara Yuichiro, Rikiyama Toshiki, Nakamura Masafumi, Endo Itaru, Sakamoto Yoshihiro, Horiguchi Akihiko, Hatori Takashi, Akita Hirofumi, Ueki Toshiharu, Idichi Tetsuya, Hanada Keiji, Suzuki Shuji, Okano Keiichi, Maehira Hiromitsu, Motoi Fuyuhiko, Fujino Yasuhiro, Tanno Satoshi, Yanagisawa Akio, Takeyama Yoshifumi, Okazaki Kazuichi, Satoi Sohei, Yamaue Hiroki
Second Department of Surgery Wakayama Medical University, School of Medicine Wakayama Japan.
Division of Hepato-Biliary-Pancreatic Surgery, Department of Gastroenterological Surgery Hyogo Medical University Nishinomiya Japan.
Ann Gastroenterol Surg. 2024 Mar 17;8(5):845-859. doi: 10.1002/ags3.12790. eCollection 2024 Sep.
Surgical resection is standard treatment for invasive intraductal papillary mucinous carcinoma (IPMC); however, impact of multidisciplinary treatment on survival including postoperative adjuvant therapy (AT), neoadjuvant therapy (NAT), and treatment for recurrent lesions is unclear. We investigated the effectiveness of multidisciplinary treatment in prolonging survival of patients with invasive IPMC.
This retrospective multi-institutional study included 1183 patients with invasive IPMC undergoing surgery at 40 academic institutions. We analyzed the effects of AT, NAT, and treatment for recurrence on survival of patients with invasive IPMC.
Completion of the planned postoperative AT for 6 months improved the overall survival (OS), disease-specific survival (DSS), and recurrence-free survival (RFS) of patients with stage IIB and stage III resected invasive IPMC, elevated preoperative carbohydrate antigen 19-9 level, lymphovascular invasion, perineural invasion, serosal invasion, and lymph node metastasis on un-matched and matched analyses. Of the patients with borderline resectable (BR) invasive IPMC, the OS ( = 0.001), DSS ( = 0.001), and RFS ( = 0.001) of patients undergoing NAT was longer than that of those without on the matched analysis. Of the 484 invasive IPMC patients (40.9%) who developed recurrence after surgery, the OS of 365 patients who received any treatment for recurrence was longer than that of those without treatment (40.6 vs. 22.4 months, < 0.001).
Postoperative AT might benefit selected patients with invasive IPMC, especially those at high risk of poor survival. NAT might improve the survivability of BR invasive IPMC. Any treatment for recurrence after surgery for invasive IPMC might improve survival.
手术切除是浸润性导管内乳头状黏液性癌(IPMC)的标准治疗方法;然而,多学科治疗对生存的影响,包括术后辅助治疗(AT)、新辅助治疗(NAT)以及复发病变的治疗尚不清楚。我们研究了多学科治疗在延长浸润性IPMC患者生存期方面的有效性。
这项回顾性多机构研究纳入了40家学术机构中1183例接受手术的浸润性IPMC患者。我们分析了AT、NAT以及复发治疗对浸润性IPMC患者生存的影响。
完成计划的6个月术后AT可改善IIB期和III期切除的浸润性IPMC患者的总生存期(OS)、疾病特异性生存期(DSS)和无复发生存期(RFS),在未匹配和匹配分析中,可提高术前糖类抗原19-9水平、淋巴管浸润、神经周围浸润、浆膜浸润和淋巴结转移。在边缘可切除(BR)浸润性IPMC患者中,匹配分析显示接受NAT的患者的OS(=0.001)、DSS(=0.001)和RFS(=0.001)长于未接受NAT的患者。在484例术后复发的浸润性IPMC患者(40.9%)中,365例接受任何复发治疗的患者的OS长于未接受治疗的患者(40.6个月对22.4个月,<0.001)。
术后AT可能使部分浸润性IPMC患者获益,尤其是那些生存预后不良风险高的患者。NAT可能改善BR浸润性IPMC的生存能力。浸润性IPMC术后的任何复发治疗都可能改善生存。