Suppr超能文献

不同人群和冥想经验的去中心比较:对经验问卷测量不变性的支持。

A comparison of decentering across demographic groups and meditation experience: Support for the measurement invariance of the Experiences Questionnaire.

机构信息

Department of Psychology.

出版信息

Psychol Assess. 2020 Feb;32(2):197-204. doi: 10.1037/pas0000767. Epub 2019 Aug 29.

Abstract

Theory and prior research suggests that decentering-an objective, distanced perspective on one's internal experiences-may vary based upon characteristics such as age, gender, race/ethnicity, and meditation experience. However, little is known about whether decentering measures are comparable in their meaning and interpretation when administered to individuals with different group membership (e.g., men or women; younger or older adults, etc.). The current study examined the measurement invariance of the Experiences Questionnaire (Fresco et al., 2007), a commonly used measure of decentering, evaluating age, gender, race/ethnicity, and meditation experience in three samples (students, community members, and clinical participants). Each sample was tested separately to assess the generalizability of results. The Experiences Questionnaire demonstrated full or partial measurement invariance in all cases, suggesting that scores are not biased based upon group membership and may be compared across individuals who vary in age, race/ethnicity, gender, and meditation experience. The current study also examined mean differences in decentering by groups, finding some evidence that decentering scores are higher for men, racial/ethnic minorities, older adults, and individuals with more meditation experiences. Implications are discussed for assessing decentering in diverse samples. (PsycINFO Database Record (c) 2020 APA, all rights reserved).

摘要

理论和先前的研究表明,去中心化——一种对自身内部体验的客观、距离的视角——可能会因年龄、性别、种族/民族和冥想经验等特征而有所不同。然而,对于不同群体成员(例如男性或女性;年轻人或老年人等)接受时,去中心化测量的意义和解释是否具有可比性,我们知之甚少。本研究考察了经验问卷(Fresco 等人,2007 年)的测量不变性,该问卷是一种常用的去中心化测量方法,评估了三个样本(学生、社区成员和临床参与者)中的年龄、性别、种族/民族和冥想经验。每个样本都分别进行测试,以评估结果的普遍性。经验问卷在所有情况下都表现出完全或部分测量不变性,表明分数不受群体成员身份的影响,并且可以在年龄、种族/民族、性别和冥想经验不同的个体之间进行比较。本研究还考察了不同群体去中心化的平均差异,发现一些证据表明,男性、少数族裔、老年人和冥想经验更多的个体的去中心化得分更高。讨论了在不同样本中评估去中心化的意义。(PsycINFO 数据库记录(c)2020 APA,保留所有权利)。

相似文献

3
6
Feminist identity among women and men from four ethnic groups.女性和来自四个族群的男性中的女权主义者认同。
Cultur Divers Ethnic Minor Psychol. 2017 Jan;23(1):134-142. doi: 10.1037/cdp0000095. Epub 2016 Jun 16.

本文引用的文献

2
Metacognitive processes model of decentering: emerging methods and insights.元认知过程离解模型:新兴方法与见解。
Curr Opin Psychol. 2019 Aug;28:245-251. doi: 10.1016/j.copsyc.2019.01.019. Epub 2019 Feb 5.
5
Structure and validity of measures of decentering and defusion.去中心化和解离测量的结构与效度
Psychol Assess. 2017 Jul;29(7):935-954. doi: 10.1037/pas0000405. Epub 2016 Oct 31.
7
Cognitive mechanisms of mindfulness: A test of current models.正念的认知机制:对当前模型的检验
Conscious Cogn. 2015 Dec 15;38:50-9. doi: 10.1016/j.concog.2015.10.005. Epub 2015 Oct 24.
8
A Rasch Model Analysis of the Mindful Attention Awareness Scale.正念注意觉察量表的 Rasch 模型分析。
Assessment. 2017 Apr;24(3):387-398. doi: 10.1177/1073191115607043. Epub 2016 Jul 27.

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验