Department of Psychology.
Psychol Assess. 2020 Feb;32(2):197-204. doi: 10.1037/pas0000767. Epub 2019 Aug 29.
Theory and prior research suggests that decentering-an objective, distanced perspective on one's internal experiences-may vary based upon characteristics such as age, gender, race/ethnicity, and meditation experience. However, little is known about whether decentering measures are comparable in their meaning and interpretation when administered to individuals with different group membership (e.g., men or women; younger or older adults, etc.). The current study examined the measurement invariance of the Experiences Questionnaire (Fresco et al., 2007), a commonly used measure of decentering, evaluating age, gender, race/ethnicity, and meditation experience in three samples (students, community members, and clinical participants). Each sample was tested separately to assess the generalizability of results. The Experiences Questionnaire demonstrated full or partial measurement invariance in all cases, suggesting that scores are not biased based upon group membership and may be compared across individuals who vary in age, race/ethnicity, gender, and meditation experience. The current study also examined mean differences in decentering by groups, finding some evidence that decentering scores are higher for men, racial/ethnic minorities, older adults, and individuals with more meditation experiences. Implications are discussed for assessing decentering in diverse samples. (PsycINFO Database Record (c) 2020 APA, all rights reserved).
理论和先前的研究表明,去中心化——一种对自身内部体验的客观、距离的视角——可能会因年龄、性别、种族/民族和冥想经验等特征而有所不同。然而,对于不同群体成员(例如男性或女性;年轻人或老年人等)接受时,去中心化测量的意义和解释是否具有可比性,我们知之甚少。本研究考察了经验问卷(Fresco 等人,2007 年)的测量不变性,该问卷是一种常用的去中心化测量方法,评估了三个样本(学生、社区成员和临床参与者)中的年龄、性别、种族/民族和冥想经验。每个样本都分别进行测试,以评估结果的普遍性。经验问卷在所有情况下都表现出完全或部分测量不变性,表明分数不受群体成员身份的影响,并且可以在年龄、种族/民族、性别和冥想经验不同的个体之间进行比较。本研究还考察了不同群体去中心化的平均差异,发现一些证据表明,男性、少数族裔、老年人和冥想经验更多的个体的去中心化得分更高。讨论了在不同样本中评估去中心化的意义。(PsycINFO 数据库记录(c)2020 APA,保留所有权利)。