Suppr超能文献

猪的血小板功能检测——使用 Multiplate®分析仪。

Platelet function testing in pigs using the Multiplate® Analyzer.

机构信息

Department of Diagnostic and Interventional Neuroradiology, RWTH Aachen University Hospital, Aachen, Germany.

Department of Veterinary Clinical Sciences, Small Animal Clinic, Justus-Liebig-University, Giessen, Germany.

出版信息

PLoS One. 2019 Aug 29;14(8):e0222010. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0222010. eCollection 2019.

Abstract

For endovascular research pigs are an established animal model. However, experiences regarding analyses of platelet inhibition in pigs using the Multiplate® Analyzer are limited. The aims of the present study were to investigate if (1) the Multiplate® Analyzer is a suitable method for examination of porcine platelet function using manufacturers' recommendations for human blood, and (2) platelet inhibition can be induced with acetylsalicylic acid (ASA) and clopidogrel in pigs reliably, and if (3) non-responders to one of the drug can be detected. Additionally we examined differences in (4) the effectiveness of ASA between oral administration and intravenous application, and (5) between domestic pigs (German Landrace; GL) and miniature pigs (MP). We investigated platelet function of 36 unmedicated pigs (GL n = 28; MP n = 8). In addition, 32 blood samples taken from medicated pigs (GL n = 15; MP n = 17) were analysed. Platelet inhibition was induced in four different ways: (1) 500 mg ASA intravenously (n = 11), (2) 500 mg ASA intravenously and 450 mg clopidogrel orally (n = 5), (3) 250 mg ASA orally (n = 11), (4) 250 mg ASA orally and 75 mg clopidogrel orally (n = 5). Results of the ASPI and ADP test of the Multiplate® Analyzer subtests in unmedicated and medicated pigs were in a comparable range to results known from humans. Application of ASA decreased the mean values of the ASPI test significantly regardless of the application method. Joined administration of ASA and clopidogrel also decreased the mean values of the ADP test significantly. Both, oral and intravenous administrations of ASA as well as oral administration of clopidogrel effectively inhibited platelet function in pigs. One pig did not respond to clopidogrel. We found no differences between domestic and miniature pigs regarding reference values in unmedicated pigs and the effectiveness of ASA and clopidogrel.

摘要

对于血管内研究,猪是一种成熟的动物模型。然而,使用 Multiplate® Analyzer 分析猪的血小板抑制作用的经验有限。本研究的目的是探讨(1)是否可以按照制造商对人血的建议,使用 Multiplate® Analyzer 来检查猪的血小板功能,以及(2)是否可以可靠地用阿司匹林(ASA)和氯吡格雷诱导血小板抑制作用,以及(3)是否可以检测到对一种药物无反应的猪。此外,我们还检查了(4)ASA 口服和静脉应用之间的(5)以及国内猪(德国长白猪;GL)和小型猪(MP)之间的(3)有效性的差异。我们研究了 36 头未用药物治疗的猪的血小板功能(GL n = 28;MP n = 8)。此外,分析了 32 份来自用药物治疗的猪的血液样本(GL n = 15;MP n = 17)。通过四种不同的方式诱导血小板抑制:(1)静脉内给予 500mg ASA(n = 11),(2)静脉内给予 500mg ASA 和口服给予 450mg 氯吡格雷(n = 5),(3)口服给予 250mg ASA(n = 11),(4)口服给予 250mg ASA 和口服给予 75mg 氯吡格雷(n = 5)。Multiplate® Analyzer 亚测试中未用药物和用药物治疗的猪的 ASPI 和 ADP 测试的结果与从人类中获得的结果在可比范围内。无论应用方法如何,ASA 的应用均显著降低 ASPI 测试的平均值。ASA 和氯吡格雷的联合给药也显著降低 ADP 测试的平均值。ASA 的口服和静脉给药以及氯吡格雷的口服给药均可有效抑制猪的血小板功能。一头猪对氯吡格雷无反应。关于未用药物治疗的猪的参考值以及 ASA 和氯吡格雷的有效性,我们在国内猪和小型猪之间未发现差异。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/721e/6715187/986f46c89cb9/pone.0222010.g001.jpg

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验