Suppr超能文献

用钱包投票?市政预算政策与选举结果。

Voting with your wallet? Municipal budget policy and election results.

机构信息

Ghent University, Ghent, Belgium.

Research Foundation-Flanders, Brussels, Belgium.

出版信息

PLoS One. 2019 Aug 29;14(8):e0221619. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0221619. eCollection 2019.

Abstract

In this research letter, we examine the impact of municipal budget policy on the percentage of votes for the incumbent majority parties in subsequent elections. We contribute to the academic literature by examining the combined influence of taxes, expenditures and debt. Based on data for Flanders (Belgium) between 1994 and 2012, we find no significant association between these budget variables and the actual election results.

摘要

在这篇研究通讯中,我们考察了市政预算政策对随后选举中现任多数党选票百分比的影响。我们通过考察税收、支出和债务的综合影响,为学术文献做出了贡献。基于 1994 年至 2012 年间弗拉芒地区(比利时)的数据,我们没有发现这些预算变量与实际选举结果之间存在显著关联。

相似文献

1
Voting with your wallet? Municipal budget policy and election results.用钱包投票?市政预算政策与选举结果。
PLoS One. 2019 Aug 29;14(8):e0221619. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0221619. eCollection 2019.
2
Political cycles: Beyond rational expectations.政治周期:超越理性预期。
PLoS One. 2018 Oct 11;13(10):e0203390. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0203390. eCollection 2018.
6
Clout, activists and budget: The road to presidency.影响力、活动家和预算:通往总统宝座之路。
PLoS One. 2018 Mar 1;13(3):e0193199. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0193199. eCollection 2018.

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验