Suppr超能文献

醋酸乌利司他与促性腺激素释放激素激动剂在腹腔镜子宫肌瘤剔除术前的应用(MYOMEX 试验):一项双盲随机对照试验的短期结果。

Ulipristal acetate vs gonadotropin-releasing hormone agonists prior to laparoscopic myomectomy (MYOMEX trial): Short-term results of a double-blind randomized controlled trial.

机构信息

Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Amsterdam Reproduction and Development, University Medical Center Amterdam, location VU Medical Center, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.

Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, University Medical Center Amterdam, location Academic Medical Center, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.

出版信息

Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand. 2020 Jan;99(1):89-98. doi: 10.1111/aogs.13713. Epub 2019 Sep 27.

Abstract

INTRODUCTION

Laparoscopic myomectomy can be difficult when fibroids are large and numerous. This may result in extensive intraoperative bleeding and the need for a conversion to a laparotomy. Medical pretreatment prior to surgery might reduce these risks by decreasing fibroid size and vascularization of the fibroid. We compared pretreatment with ulipristal acetate (UPA) vs gonadotropin-releasing hormone agonists (GnRHa) prior to laparoscopic myomectomy on several intra- and postoperative outcomes.

MATERIAL AND METHODS

We performed a non-inferiority double-blind randomized controlled trial in nine hospitals in the Netherlands. Women were randomized between daily oral UPA for 12 weeks and single placebo injection or single intramuscular injection with leuprolide acetate and daily placebo tablets for 12 weeks. The primary outcome was intraoperative blood loss. Secondary outcomes were reduction of fibroid volume, suturing time, total surgery time and surgical ease.

RESULTS

Thirty women received UPA and 25 women leuprolide acetate. Non-inferiority of UPA regarding intraoperative blood loss was not demonstrated. When pretreated with UPA, median intraoperative blood loss was statistically significantly higher (525 mL [348-1025] vs 280 mL[100-500]; P = 0.011) and suturing time of the first fibroid was statistically significantly longer (40 minutes [28-48] vs 22 minutes [14-33]; P = 0.003) compared with GnRHa. Pretreatment with UPA showed smaller reduction in fibroid volume preoperatively compared with GnRHa (-7.2% [-35.5 to 54.1] vs -38.4% [-71.5 to -19.3]; P = 0.001). Laparoscopic myomectomies in women pretreated with UPA were subjectively judged more difficult than in women pretreated with GnRHa.

CONCLUSIONS

Non-inferiority of UPA in terms of intraoperative blood loss could not be established, possibly due to the preliminary termination of the study. Pretreatment with GnRHa was more favorable than UPA in terms of fibroid volume reduction, intraoperative blood loss, hemoglobin drop directly postoperatively, suturing time of the first fibroid and several subjective surgical ease parameters.

摘要

简介

当肌瘤较大且数量较多时,腹腔镜子宫肌瘤切除术可能会很困难。这可能会导致术中大量出血,并需要转为开腹手术。手术前进行医学预处理可能会通过减小肌瘤大小和肌瘤的血管化来降低这些风险。我们比较了术前使用乌司他丁(UPA)与促性腺激素释放激素激动剂(GnRHa)治疗对腹腔镜子宫肌瘤切除术的几种围手术期结果的影响。

材料与方法

我们在荷兰的九家医院进行了一项非劣效性双盲随机对照试验。妇女被随机分为每日口服 UPA 12 周组和安慰剂注射组或单肌内注射醋酸亮丙瑞林和每日安慰剂片剂 12 周组。主要结局是术中出血量。次要结局是肌瘤体积减少、缝合时间、总手术时间和手术难易程度。

结果

30 名妇女接受了 UPA 治疗,25 名妇女接受了醋酸亮丙瑞林治疗。未能证明 UPA 在术中出血量方面不劣于对照组。当用 UPA 预处理时,中位术中出血量明显更高(525ml[348-1025]vs280ml[100-500];P=0.011),第一个肌瘤的缝合时间明显更长(40 分钟[28-48]vs22 分钟[14-33];P=0.003)与 GnRHa 相比。与 GnRHa 相比,UPA 预处理术前肌瘤体积减少较小(-7.2%[-35.5 至 54.1]vs-38.4%[-71.5 至-19.3];P=0.001)。与 GnRHa 预处理相比,UPA 预处理的腹腔镜子宫肌瘤切除术被主观判断为更困难。

结论

由于研究的初步终止,未能确定 UPA 在术中出血量方面的非劣效性。与 UPA 相比,GnRHa 在肌瘤体积缩小、术中出血量、术后直接血红蛋白下降、第一个肌瘤的缝合时间和几个主观手术难易程度参数方面更有优势。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/aa1e/6973004/693b1cd5c970/AOGS-99-89-g001.jpg

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验