• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

利用两项大型国家健康调查数据,对美国各县的癌症风险因素和筛查行为进行小区域估计。

Small Area Estimation of Cancer Risk Factors and Screening Behaviors in US Counties by Combining Two Large National Health Surveys.

机构信息

Division of Cancer Control and Population Sciences, National Cancer Institute, Bethesda, Maryland.

Statistical Research and Applications Branch, Division of Cancer Control and Population Sciences, National Cancer Institute, 9609 Medical Center Drive, MSC 9765, Bethesda, MD 20892. Email:

出版信息

Prev Chronic Dis. 2019 Aug 29;16:E119. doi: 10.5888/pcd16.190013.

DOI:10.5888/pcd16.190013
PMID:31469068
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC6716412/
Abstract

BACKGROUND

National health surveys, such as the National Health Interview Survey (NHIS) and the Behavioral Risk Factor Surveillance System (BRFSS), collect data on cancer screening and smoking-related measures in the US noninstitutionalized population. These surveys are designed to produce reliable estimates at the national and state levels. However, county-level data are often needed for cancer surveillance and related research.

METHODS

To use the large sample sizes of BRFSS and the high response rates and better coverage of NHIS, we applied multilevel models that combined information from both surveys. We also used relevant sources such as census and administrative records. By using these methods, we generated estimates for several cancer risk factors and screening behaviors that are more precise than design-based estimates.

RESULTS

We produced reliable, modeled estimates for 11 outcomes related to smoking and to screening for female breast cancer, cervical cancer, and colorectal cancer. The estimates were produced for 3,112 counties in the United States for the data period from 2008 through 2010.

CONCLUSION

The modeled estimates corrected for potential noncoverage bias and nonresponse bias in the BRFSS and reduced the variability in NHIS estimates that is attributable to small sample size. The small area estimates produced in this study can serve as a useful resource to the cancer surveillance community.

摘要

背景

国家健康调查,如全国健康访谈调查(NHIS)和行为风险因素监测系统(BRFSS),在美国非机构化人群中收集癌症筛查和与吸烟相关措施的数据。这些调查旨在产生国家和州一级的可靠估计。然而,癌症监测和相关研究通常需要县级数据。

方法

为了利用 BRFSS 的大样本量和 NHIS 的高应答率和更好的覆盖范围,我们应用了结合了这两个调查信息的多层次模型。我们还使用了相关来源,如人口普查和行政记录。通过使用这些方法,我们生成了比基于设计的估计更精确的几个癌症风险因素和筛查行为的估计。

结果

我们为 2008 年至 2010 年期间的 11 项与吸烟和女性乳腺癌、宫颈癌和结直肠癌筛查相关的结果生成了可靠的、基于模型的估计。这些估计是针对美国 3112 个县进行的。

结论

模型估计纠正了 BRFSS 中潜在的未覆盖偏差和无应答偏差,并减少了 NHIS 估计中因样本量小而产生的可变性。本研究中产生的小区域估计可以作为癌症监测界的有用资源。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/57d8/6716412/028dccd5d5f0/PCD-16-E119s02.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/57d8/6716412/d313974755e4/PCD-16-E119s01.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/57d8/6716412/028dccd5d5f0/PCD-16-E119s02.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/57d8/6716412/d313974755e4/PCD-16-E119s01.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/57d8/6716412/028dccd5d5f0/PCD-16-E119s02.jpg

相似文献

1
Small Area Estimation of Cancer Risk Factors and Screening Behaviors in US Counties by Combining Two Large National Health Surveys.利用两项大型国家健康调查数据,对美国各县的癌症风险因素和筛查行为进行小区域估计。
Prev Chronic Dis. 2019 Aug 29;16:E119. doi: 10.5888/pcd16.190013.
2
Comparing cancer screening estimates: Behavioral Risk Factor Surveillance System and National Health Interview Survey.比较癌症筛查估计值:行为风险因素监测系统和国家健康访谈调查。
Prev Med. 2018 Jan;106:94-100. doi: 10.1016/j.ypmed.2017.10.019. Epub 2017 Oct 31.
3
Surveillance for certain health behaviors among states and selected local areas--behavioral risk factor surveillance system, United States, 2004.美国2004年各州及部分地方地区特定健康行为监测——行为危险因素监测系统
MMWR Surveill Summ. 2006 Jul 14;55(7):1-124.
4
Surveillance for certain health behaviors among selected local areas--United States, Behavioral Risk Factor Surveillance System, 2002.2002年美国特定局部地区某些健康行为监测——行为危险因素监测系统
MMWR Surveill Summ. 2004 Jul 23;53(5):1-100.
5
Multilevel Small-Area Estimation of Colorectal Cancer Screening in the United States.美国结直肠癌筛查的多层次小区域估计。
Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev. 2018 Mar;27(3):245-253. doi: 10.1158/1055-9965.EPI-17-0488.
6
Surveillance for Certain Health Behaviors, Chronic Diseases, and Conditions, Access to Health Care, and Use of Preventive Health Services Among States and Selected Local Areas
- Behavioral Risk Factor Surveillance System, United States, 2012.国家和部分选定地区特定健康行为、慢性病及状况、卫生保健服务利用和预防保健服务的监测
- 美国 2012 年行为危险因素监测系统。
MMWR Surveill Summ. 2016 Apr 29;65(4):1-142. doi: 10.15585/mmwr.ss6504a1.
7
Surveillance of certain health behaviors and conditions among states and selected local areas--Behavioral Risk Factor Surveillance System (BRFSS), United States, 2006.2006年美国各州及部分特定地区某些健康行为与状况监测——行为危险因素监测系统(BRFSS)
MMWR Surveill Summ. 2008 Aug 15;57(7):1-188.
8
State-based estimates of mammography screening rates based on information from two health surveys.基于两项健康调查信息的基于州的乳腺 X 光筛查率估计。
Public Health Rep. 2010 Jul-Aug;125(4):567-78. doi: 10.1177/003335491012500412.
9
Cancer screening practices from National Health Interview Surveys: past, present, and future.来自国家健康访谈调查的癌症筛查实践:过去、现在和未来。
J Natl Cancer Inst. 2002 Dec 18;94(24):1837-46. doi: 10.1093/jnci/94.24.1837.
10
Using 3 Health Surveys to Compare Multilevel Models for Small Area Estimation for Chronic Diseases and Health Behaviors.利用三项健康调查比较用于慢性病和健康行为小区域估计的多层次模型。
Prev Chronic Dis. 2018 Nov 1;15:E133. doi: 10.5888/pcd15.180313.

引用本文的文献

1
Lung Cancer Screening Rates in the United States: Contribution of the 2020 NHIS Estimates to National and State-Level Trends.美国肺癌筛查率:2020年美国国家健康访谈调查(NHIS)估计值对国家和州层面趋势的贡献。
Am J Prev Med. 2025 Jul;69(1):107626. doi: 10.1016/j.amepre.2025.03.006. Epub 2025 Mar 27.
2
Hierarchical Bayes small area estimation for county-level health prevalence to having a personal doctor.用于县级有私人医生健康患病率的分层贝叶斯小区域估计。
Stat Methods Appt. 2022 Dec;33:1171-1191. doi: 10.1007/s10260-022-00678-7.
3
Small Area Estimation of PSA Testing in US States and Counties.

本文引用的文献

1
Urban/Rural Differences in Breast and Cervical Cancer Incidence: The Mediating Roles of Socioeconomic Status and Provider Density.城乡乳腺癌和宫颈癌发病率的差异:社会经济地位和医疗服务提供者密度的中介作用。
Womens Health Issues. 2017 Nov-Dec;27(6):683-691. doi: 10.1016/j.whi.2017.09.008. Epub 2017 Nov 3.
2
Comparing cancer screening estimates: Behavioral Risk Factor Surveillance System and National Health Interview Survey.比较癌症筛查估计值:行为风险因素监测系统和国家健康访谈调查。
Prev Med. 2018 Jan;106:94-100. doi: 10.1016/j.ypmed.2017.10.019. Epub 2017 Oct 31.
3
Trends and Patterns of Disparities in Cancer Mortality Among US Counties, 1980-2014.
美国各州及各县前列腺特异性抗原检测的小区域估计
Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev. 2025 Jan 9;34(1):197-204. doi: 10.1158/1055-9965.EPI-24-1086.
4
Association of US county-level social vulnerability index with breast, colorectal, and lung cancer screening, incidence, and mortality rates across US counties.美国县级社会脆弱性指数与美国各县乳腺癌、结直肠癌和肺癌筛查、发病率及死亡率的关联
Front Oncol. 2024 Aug 7;14:1422475. doi: 10.3389/fonc.2024.1422475. eCollection 2024.
5
Unveiling rural and Appalachian disparities in cigarette smoking through the social vulnerability index and other county-level characteristics.通过社会脆弱性指数和其他县级特征揭示农村和阿巴拉契亚地区吸烟情况的差异。
J Rural Health. 2025 Jan;41(1):e12860. doi: 10.1111/jrh.12860. Epub 2024 Jun 20.
6
Re-scaling and small area estimation of behavioral risk survey guided by social vulnerability data.基于社会脆弱性数据的行为风险调查的重新定标和小区域估计。
BMC Public Health. 2023 Jan 27;23(1):184. doi: 10.1186/s12889-022-14970-4.
7
Assessment of Colorectal Cancer Screening Disparities in U.S. Men and Women Using a Demographically Representative Sample.采用人口代表性样本评估美国男性和女性的结直肠癌筛查差异。
Cancer Res Commun. 2022 Jun;2(6):561-569. doi: 10.1158/2767-9764.crc-22-0079. Epub 2022 Jun 30.
8
A population health assessment of screening mammography on breast cancer mortality in North Carolina.北卡罗来纳州乳腺癌死亡率的人群健康评估筛查乳腺摄影。
Breast Cancer Res Treat. 2022 Dec;196(3):647-656. doi: 10.1007/s10549-022-06773-3. Epub 2022 Oct 26.
9
Cancer disparities in the context of rurality: risk factors and screening across various U.S. rural classification codes.农村背景下的癌症差异:美国各种农村分类代码中的风险因素和筛查。
Cancer Causes Control. 2022 Aug;33(8):1095-1105. doi: 10.1007/s10552-022-01599-2. Epub 2022 Jun 30.
10
Reduction in Standard Cancer Screening in 2020 throughout the U.S.2020年美国全国标准癌症筛查量下降
Cancers (Basel). 2021 Nov 25;13(23):5918. doi: 10.3390/cancers13235918.
1980 - 2014年美国各县癌症死亡率差异的趋势与模式
JAMA. 2017 Jan 24;317(4):388-406. doi: 10.1001/jama.2016.20324.
4
A Methodological Approach to Small Area Estimation for the Behavioral Risk Factor Surveillance System.行为危险因素监测系统小区域估计的一种方法学途径。
Prev Chronic Dis. 2016 Jul 14;13:E91. doi: 10.5888/pcd13.150480.
5
Using Small-Area Estimation to Calculate the Prevalence of Smoking by Subcounty Geographic Areas in King County, Washington, Behavioral Risk Factor Surveillance System, 2009-2013.利用小区域估计法计算华盛顿州金县按次县级地理区域划分的吸烟流行率,行为风险因素监测系统,2009 - 2013年。
Prev Chronic Dis. 2016 May 5;13:E59. doi: 10.5888/pcd13.150536.
6
Breast Cancer Screening, Incidence, and Mortality Across US Counties.美国各县的乳腺癌筛查、发病率和死亡率
JAMA Intern Med. 2015 Sep;175(9):1483-9. doi: 10.1001/jamainternmed.2015.3043.
7
Multilevel regression and poststratification for small-area estimation of population health outcomes: a case study of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease prevalence using the behavioral risk factor surveillance system.多水平回归和后分层法在小区域人群健康结果估计中的应用:以行为风险因素监测系统为例评估慢性阻塞性肺疾病的流行率。
Am J Epidemiol. 2014 Apr 15;179(8):1025-33. doi: 10.1093/aje/kwu018. Epub 2014 Mar 4.
8
Cancer screening in the United States, 2012: A review of current American Cancer Society guidelines and current issues in cancer screening.美国癌症筛查 2012:对当前美国癌症协会指南及癌症筛查当前问题的回顾。
CA Cancer J Clin. 2012 Mar-Apr;62(2):129-42. doi: 10.3322/caac.20143. Epub 2012 Jan 19.
9
State-based estimates of mammography screening rates based on information from two health surveys.基于两项健康调查信息的基于州的乳腺 X 光筛查率估计。
Public Health Rep. 2010 Jul-Aug;125(4):567-78. doi: 10.1177/003335491012500412.