Pilehvari Asal, Krukowski Rebecca A, You Wen, Wiseman Kara P, Wester Abigail G, Cohn Wendy F, Anderson Roger T, Little Melissa A
Department of Public Health Sciences, University of Virginia, Charlottesville, Virginia, USA.
UVA Comprehensive Cancer Center, University of Virginia, Charlottesville, Virginia, USA.
J Rural Health. 2025 Jan;41(1):e12860. doi: 10.1111/jrh.12860. Epub 2024 Jun 20.
Mitigating tobacco-related disparities in the Appalachian region and rural areas is crucial. This study seeks to gauge cigarette smoking prevalence in Virginia counties, uncover rurality and Appalachian-linked disparities, and explore local drivers of these gaps.
A 2011-2019 Virginia BRFSS data were used to estimate county-level cigarette smoking rates in adults aged 18 or older. Counties were categorized as urban/rural and Appalachian/non-Appalachian, with a focus on rural-Appalachian. Disparities in cigarette smoking rates and associated factors were analyzed via the Blinder-Oaxaca decomposition method. The study assessed 4 dimensions of the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention's social vulnerability index (SVI): socioeconomic, minority status, household composition, and housing. Additionally, county-specific factors such as tobacco agriculture, physician availability, coal mining, and tobacco retailer density were examined.
Rural areas exhibited a 6.18% higher cigarette smoking prevalence compared to urban areas (P<.001). SVI dimensions accounted for 53.2% of the disparity, county features explained 16.4%, and 30.4% remained unexplained. Appalachian areas had a 6.79% higher cigarette smoking prevalence than non-Appalachian areas (P<.001). SVI dimensions explained 51.4% of the disparity, county features accounted for 21.8%, leaving 26.8% unexplained. Rural-Appalachian areas showed a 7.8% higher cigarette smoking prevalence (P<.001). SVI dimensions contributed to 51.7% of the disparity, county features explained 9.6%, and 38.7% remained unexplained.
Substantial disparities in cigarette smoking prevalence exist in underserved areas of Virginia, including rural, Appalachian, and rural-Appalachian regions. While SVI dimensions, physician availability, tobacco agriculture, and coal mining contribute, yet notable gaps remain unexplained. Targeted interventions must tackle unique challenges in disadvantaged areas to reduce smoking and promote health equity.
缓解阿巴拉契亚地区和农村地区与烟草相关的差异至关重要。本研究旨在评估弗吉尼亚各县的吸烟率,揭示农村地区和与阿巴拉契亚相关的差异,并探究造成这些差距的当地驱动因素。
使用2011 - 2019年弗吉尼亚州行为风险因素监测系统(BRFSS)数据来估计18岁及以上成年人的县级吸烟率。各县被分为城市/农村以及阿巴拉契亚/非阿巴拉契亚地区,重点关注农村阿巴拉契亚地区。通过布林德 - 奥瓦萨分解法分析吸烟率差异及相关因素。该研究评估了疾病控制与预防中心社会脆弱性指数(SVI)的四个维度:社会经济、少数族裔地位、家庭构成和住房情况。此外,还考察了特定县的因素,如烟草农业、医生可及性、煤矿开采和烟草零售商密度。
农村地区的吸烟率比城市地区高6.18%(P <.001)。SVI维度占差异的53.2%,县特征解释了16.4%,30.4%仍无法解释。阿巴拉契亚地区的吸烟率比非阿巴拉契亚地区高6.79%(P <.001)。SVI维度解释了差异的51.4%,县特征占21.8%,26.8%无法解释。农村阿巴拉契亚地区的吸烟率高7.8%(P <.001)。SVI维度导致差异的51.7%,县特征解释了9.6%,38.7%无法解释。
弗吉尼亚州包括农村、阿巴拉契亚和农村阿巴拉契亚地区在内的服务不足地区存在显著的吸烟率差异。虽然SVI维度、医生可及性、烟草农业和煤矿开采有影响,但仍有显著差距无法解释。有针对性的干预措施必须应对贫困地区的独特挑战,以减少吸烟并促进健康公平。