Suppr超能文献

一级排球运动员反向纵跳测试的组内和组间可靠性。

Intrasession and Intersession Reliability of Countermovement Jump Testing in Division-I Volleyball Athletes.

机构信息

Department of Sport, Exercise, Recreation, and Kinesiology, East Tennessee State University, Johnson City, Tennessee.

Department of Health and Human Performance, The Citadel-The Military College of South Carolina, Charleston, South Carolina.

出版信息

J Strength Cond Res. 2019 Nov;33(11):2932-2935. doi: 10.1519/JSC.0000000000003353.

Abstract

Carroll, KM, Wagle, JP, Sole, CJ, and Stone, MH. Intrasession and intersession reliability of countermovement jump testing in Division-I volleyball athletes. J Strength Cond Res 33(11): 2932-2935, 2019-The countermovement jump (CMJ) is a reliable and noninvasive test of lower-body neuromuscular performance. Many of the investigations used to establish the reliability of CMJ have been conducted in a controlled environment (i.e., laboratory setting). To better inform coaches, reliability of key CMJ variables should be examined in a practical environment. This study assessed intrasession and intersession reliability of CMJ variables in NCAA D-I volleyball athletes. Eleven female volleyball players (age = 19.8 ± 0.8 years, height = 1.75 ± 0.07 m, body mass = 71.6 ± 8.9 kg) performed twice weekly CMJ testing on force platforms across 14 weeks of training. Dependent variables were CMJ height (CMJH), reactive strength index modified (RSIMOD), relative peak power (rPP), and countermovement depth (CM depth). Intraclass correlation coefficients (ICCs), coefficient of variation (CV), and typical error (TE) were calculated, along with Pearson correlation coefficients. Intrasession reliability revealed excellent reliability values for CMJH (ICC = 0.94, CV = 2.9 ± 2.4%, TE = 1.25) and RSIMOD (ICC = 0.93, CV = 4.7 ± 4.9, TE = 0.03). Good reliability values were observed for rPP (ICC = 0.79, CV = 6.1 ± 10.9%, TE = 4.48), with only moderate reliability for CM depth (ICC = 0.61, CV = 7.1 ± 10.9%, TE = 16.9). Intersession reliability indicated excellent reliability for CMJH (ICC = 0.92, CV = 3.2 ± 2.8%, TE = 1.4) and RSIMOD (ICC = 0.92, CV = 5.4 ± 4.3%, TE = 0.03). However, poor reliability was observed for rPP (ICC = 0.41, CV = 10.4 ± 15.4%, TE = 7.95) and CM depth (ICC = 0.39, CV = 7.7 ± 10.8%, TE = 6.42). These results suggest that in the context of weekly athlete monitoring, measures such as CMJH and RSIMOD exhibit the greatest reliability. Conversely, measures such as CM depth and rPP exhibit high levels of variability. Practitioners seeking to track jump performance over time should be cognizant of CM depth variability and its potential impact on CMJ variables.

摘要

卡罗尔、Wagle、索莱和斯通。I 级排球运动员的反跳测试的组内和组间可靠性。J 力量与条件研究 33(11):2932-2935,2019-反跳(CMJ)是一种可靠的、非侵入性的下肢神经肌肉性能测试。许多用于建立 CMJ 可靠性的研究都是在受控环境(即实验室环境)中进行的。为了更好地为教练提供信息,应该在实际环境中检查关键 CMJ 变量的可靠性。本研究评估了 NCAA D-I 排球运动员的 CMJ 变量的组内和组间可靠性。11 名女性排球运动员(年龄=19.8±0.8 岁,身高=1.75±0.07 m,体重=71.6±8.9 kg)在 14 周的训练中每周两次在力量台上进行 CMJ 测试。因变量为 CMJ 高度(CMJH)、反应强度指数改良(RSIMOD)、相对峰值功率(rPP)和反跳深度(CM 深度)。计算了组内相关系数(ICC)、变异系数(CV)和典型误差(TE),以及 Pearson 相关系数。组内可靠性显示 CMJH(ICC=0.94,CV=2.9±2.4%,TE=1.25)和 RSIMOD(ICC=0.93,CV=4.7±4.9,TE=0.03)的可靠性值很好。rPP(ICC=0.79,CV=6.1±10.9%,TE=4.48)的可靠性值良好,而 CM 深度(ICC=0.61,CV=7.1±10.9%,TE=16.9)的可靠性值仅为中度。组间可靠性表明 CMJH(ICC=0.92,CV=3.2±2.8%,TE=1.4)和 RSIMOD(ICC=0.92,CV=5.4±4.3%,TE=0.03)的可靠性很好。然而,rPP(ICC=0.41,CV=10.4±15.4%,TE=7.95)和 CM 深度(ICC=0.39,CV=7.7±10.8%,TE=6.42)的可靠性较差。这些结果表明,在每周监测运动员的情况下,CMJH 和 RSIMOD 等指标表现出最大的可靠性。相反,CM 深度和 rPP 等指标表现出高度的可变性。那些希望随时间跟踪跳跃表现的从业者应该意识到 CM 深度的可变性及其对 CMJ 变量的潜在影响。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验