Huebner Alan, Lever Jonathon R, Clark Thomas W, Suchomel Timothy J, Metoyer Casey J, Hauenstein Jonathan D, Wagle John P
Sports Performance, University of Notre Dame, Notre Dame, IN 46556, USA.
Department of Applied and Computational Mathematics and Statistics, University of Notre Dame, Notre Dame, IN 46556, USA.
Sports (Basel). 2025 Mar 12;13(3):85. doi: 10.3390/sports13030085.
This study aimed to evaluate the reliability of countermovement jump (CMJ) performance metrics across five NCAA Division I varsity sports using Generalizability Theory (G-Theory). Three hundred male athletes from football, hockey, baseball, soccer, and lacrosse performed three or more CMJs on dual-force platforms. G-Theory was applied to identify variance components and determine reliability coefficients (Φ) for 14 key metrics. Metrics requiring more than three jumps to achieve Φ 0.80 were deemed unreliable. Metric reliability varied by sport and phase of movement. Metrics associated with the eccentric phase (e.g., Eccentric Duration, Deceleration Rate of Force Development Asymmetry) demonstrated lower reliability, often requiring >3 jumps. Reliable metrics across sports included Phase 1 Concentric Impulse and Scaled Power, requiring three trials or fewer. CMJ reliability is sport- and metric-specific. Practitioners should prioritize reliable metrics and adjust protocols to balance data quality and practicality, particularly when monitoring eccentric characteristics.
本研究旨在运用概化理论(G理论)评估美国大学体育协会(NCAA)第一分区五项大学体育项目中反向纵跳(CMJ)表现指标的可靠性。来自橄榄球、曲棍球、棒球、足球和长曲棍球项目的300名男性运动员在双力平台上进行了三次或更多次CMJ测试。运用G理论识别方差成分,并确定14项关键指标的可靠性系数(Φ)。达到Φ0.80需要超过三次跳跃的指标被认为不可靠。指标可靠性因运动项目和运动阶段而异。与离心阶段相关的指标(如离心持续时间、力量发展不对称减速速率)显示出较低的可靠性,通常需要超过3次跳跃。各运动项目中可靠的指标包括第1阶段向心冲量和标度功率,需要三次或更少的测试。CMJ的可靠性因运动项目和指标而异。从业者应优先考虑可靠的指标,并调整测试方案以平衡数据质量和实用性,尤其是在监测离心特征时。