• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

谁负责评估儿童的体重状况?——澳大利亚地区卫生专业人员的定性研究。

Who is responsible for assessing children's weight status? - a qualitative study of health professionals in regional Australia.

机构信息

School of Exercise and Nutrition Sciences, Faculty of Health, Queensland University of Technology, Kelvin Grove Campus, O Block, A Wing, Victoria Park Road, Kelvin Grove, Brisbane, Queensland, 4059, Australia.

Sydney Nursing School, The Universtiy of Sydney, 88 Mallett St, Sydney, New South Wales, 2050, Australia.

出版信息

BMC Public Health. 2019 Aug 30;19(1):1196. doi: 10.1186/s12889-019-7539-x.

DOI:10.1186/s12889-019-7539-x
PMID:31470830
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC6716851/
Abstract

BACKGROUND

Currently in Australia there is a lack of clarity regarding routine assessment of primary school aged children's weight status despite it being the first step in the identification of overweight and obesity. The National Health and Medical Research Council Obesity Guidelines recommend primary health care professionals include routine weight status assessment in consultations with children yet research suggests this rarely occurs in practice. This study aimed to determine the views of primary health care professionals regarding routine weight status assessment in primary school aged children and to establish the barriers to assessing children's weight status.

METHODS

Using the case study of a regional town, Rockhampton, purposeful sampling was used to represent the key primary health care settings and professional groups. Interviews were conducted with 31 health professionals. Data were collected and analysed guided by two frameworks, the Capability, Opportunity, Motivation and Behaviour and Theoretical Domains Frameworks.

RESULTS

Eight themes emerged from data and these were relevant to the three levels of influence on the routine weight status of assessment, system, setting and individual. System level themes related to having a formalised program for the undertaking of routine weight status assessment in primary school aged children, increasing the population's awareness about the importance of the weight status check and limited public health services available for management of childhood overweight and obesity. Setting level theme regarded the location where routine weight status in primary school aged children could be undertaken. Four themes at the individual level of influence on the routine weight status assessment related to the primary health professionals' roles, barriers to assessing children's weight status, methods of weight status assessment and starting a weight related conversations with families.

CONCLUSION

The Government, primary health care services, professional organisations and associations as well as health professionals must commit to long-term implementation of the Obesity Guidelines. Immediate action to improve the undertaking of routine weight status assessment in children must be taken by each health service and health professional. Strategies should aim to positively affect motivation to assess children's weight status as it is the central component in creating change in practice.

摘要

背景

目前,尽管评估小学生体重状况是识别超重和肥胖的第一步,但澳大利亚仍缺乏对其进行常规评估的明确规定。国家卫生和医学研究委员会肥胖指南建议初级保健专业人员在与儿童的咨询中纳入常规体重状况评估,但研究表明,这在实践中很少发生。本研究旨在确定初级保健专业人员对小学生常规体重评估的看法,并确定评估儿童体重状况的障碍。

方法

采用以区域城镇罗克汉普顿为案例研究的目的抽样法,代表主要的初级保健环境和专业群体。对 31 名卫生专业人员进行了访谈。数据收集和分析以两个框架为指导,即能力、机会、动机和行为框架和理论领域框架。

结果

从数据中得出了 8 个主题,这些主题与影响评估小学生常规体重状况的三个层面(系统、环境和个人)相关。系统层面的主题涉及为小学生进行常规体重评估制定一个正式的方案,提高公众对体重检查重要性的认识,以及为管理儿童超重和肥胖提供有限的公共卫生服务。环境层面的主题涉及可进行小学生常规体重评估的位置。个人层面的 4 个主题与初级保健专业人员的角色、评估儿童体重状况的障碍、体重状况评估方法以及与家庭开展体重相关对话有关。

结论

政府、初级保健服务、专业组织和协会以及卫生专业人员必须承诺长期执行《肥胖指南》。每个卫生服务机构和卫生专业人员都必须立即采取行动,改善对儿童常规体重评估的开展。策略应旨在积极影响评估儿童体重状况的动机,因为这是改变实践的核心组成部分。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/7053/6716851/50a3dc2326a0/12889_2019_7539_Fig2_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/7053/6716851/153e679758eb/12889_2019_7539_Fig1_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/7053/6716851/50a3dc2326a0/12889_2019_7539_Fig2_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/7053/6716851/153e679758eb/12889_2019_7539_Fig1_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/7053/6716851/50a3dc2326a0/12889_2019_7539_Fig2_HTML.jpg

相似文献

1
Who is responsible for assessing children's weight status? - a qualitative study of health professionals in regional Australia.谁负责评估儿童的体重状况?——澳大利亚地区卫生专业人员的定性研究。
BMC Public Health. 2019 Aug 30;19(1):1196. doi: 10.1186/s12889-019-7539-x.
2
Parental opinions about the responsibility for assessing children's weight status - a survey of Rockhampton parents.家长对评估儿童体重状况的责任的看法 - 罗克汉普顿家长调查。
Aust N Z J Public Health. 2019 Oct;43(5):436-442. doi: 10.1111/1753-6405.12928. Epub 2019 Aug 7.
3
Assessment of Clinicians' Views for Managing Children with Obesity in the Primary, Secondary, and Tertiary Settings.评估临床医生在初级、中级和三级医疗机构中管理肥胖儿童的观点。
Child Obes. 2019 Dec;15(8):510-518. doi: 10.1089/chi.2019.0106. Epub 2019 Aug 9.
4
How is children's weight status assessed for early identification of overweight and obesity? - Narrative review of programs for weight status assessment.如何评估儿童的体重状况以早期识别超重和肥胖?——体重状况评估项目的叙述性综述
J Child Health Care. 2018 Sep;22(3):486-500. doi: 10.1177/1367493518759238. Epub 2018 Feb 13.
5
What are health professionals' perceptions of conducting routine growth assessments and lifestyle interventions? A qualitative study involving allied health professionals, nurses and doctors in rural and regional New South Wales.健康专业人员对进行常规生长评估和生活方式干预有何看法?一项涉及新南威尔士州农村和地区的专职医疗人员、护士和医生的定性研究。
Aust J Prim Health. 2023 Dec;29(6):596-605. doi: 10.1071/PY22251.
6
A description of health care system factors in the implementation of universal weight management services for children with overweight or obesity: case studies from Queensland and New South Wales, Australia.描述医疗保健系统因素在澳大利亚昆士兰州和新南威尔士州实施超重或肥胖儿童普遍体重管理服务的情况:来自昆士兰州和新南威尔士州的案例研究。
Implement Sci. 2018 Aug 7;13(1):109. doi: 10.1186/s13012-018-0801-2.
7
Children's, parents' and health professionals' views on the management of childhood asthma: a qualitative study.儿童、家长和卫生专业人员对儿童哮喘管理的看法:一项定性研究。
NPJ Prim Care Respir Med. 2017 Sep 11;27(1):53. doi: 10.1038/s41533-017-0053-7.
8
'It's difficult, I think it's complicated': Health care professionals' barriers and enablers to providing opportunistic behaviour change interventions during routine medical consultations.“这很困难,我认为这很复杂”:医疗保健专业人员在常规医疗咨询中提供机会性行为改变干预措施的障碍和促成因素。
Br J Health Psychol. 2019 Sep;24(3):571-592. doi: 10.1111/bjhp.12368. Epub 2019 Apr 12.
9
Addressing childhood obesity at school entry: Qualitative experiences of school health professionals.入学时应对儿童肥胖问题:学校卫生专业人员的定性经验
J Child Health Care. 2016 Sep;20(3):304-13. doi: 10.1177/1367493515587061. Epub 2015 Jun 23.
10
Perceptions and Practices of Oral Health Care Professionals in Preventing and Managing Childhood Obesity.口腔保健专业人员在预防和管理儿童肥胖方面的认知和实践。
Nutrients. 2022 Apr 26;14(9):1809. doi: 10.3390/nu14091809.

引用本文的文献

1
Barriers and enablers to effective weight management for people living with overweight and obesity: A rapid scoping review.超重和肥胖人群有效体重管理的障碍与促进因素:一项快速综述。
Obes Rev. 2025 Mar;26(3):e13858. doi: 10.1111/obr.13858. Epub 2024 Nov 1.
2
Exploring Pediatric Obesity Training, Perspectives, and Management Patterns Among Pediatric Primary Care Physicians.探讨儿科初级保健医生的小儿肥胖培训、观点和管理模式。
Obesity (Silver Spring). 2021 Jan;29(1):159-170. doi: 10.1002/oby.22990. Epub 2020 Nov 12.

本文引用的文献

1
Parental opinions about the responsibility for assessing children's weight status - a survey of Rockhampton parents.家长对评估儿童体重状况的责任的看法 - 罗克汉普顿家长调查。
Aust N Z J Public Health. 2019 Oct;43(5):436-442. doi: 10.1111/1753-6405.12928. Epub 2019 Aug 7.
2
How is children's weight status assessed for early identification of overweight and obesity? - Narrative review of programs for weight status assessment.如何评估儿童的体重状况以早期识别超重和肥胖?——体重状况评估项目的叙述性综述
J Child Health Care. 2018 Sep;22(3):486-500. doi: 10.1177/1367493518759238. Epub 2018 Feb 13.
3
Barriers and facilitators for the management of vertigo: a qualitative study with primary care providers.
眩晕管理的障碍和促进因素:初级保健提供者的定性研究。
Implement Sci. 2018 Feb 8;13(1):25. doi: 10.1186/s13012-018-0716-y.
4
Big hearts, small hands: a focus group study exploring parental food portion behaviours.爱心大手:一项探讨父母食物分量行为的焦点小组研究。 (注:原文标题可能有误,推测正确标题为“Big hands, small hearts: a focus group study exploring parental food portion behaviours.”,直译为“大手,小心思:一项探讨父母食物分量行为的焦点小组研究” ,这里按照你提供的原文翻译。)
BMC Public Health. 2017 Sep 18;17(1):716. doi: 10.1186/s12889-017-4711-z.
5
Designing an implementation intervention with the Behaviour Change Wheel for health provider smoking cessation care for Australian Indigenous pregnant women.运用行为改变轮设计实施干预措施,以改善澳大利亚土著孕妇的卫生保健提供者戒烟服务。
Implement Sci. 2017 Sep 15;12(1):114. doi: 10.1186/s13012-017-0645-1.
6
Characterising an implementation intervention in terms of behaviour change techniques and theory: the 'Sepsis Six' clinical care bundle.根据行为改变技术和理论对一项实施干预措施进行特征描述:“脓毒症六步法”临床护理集束。
Implement Sci. 2015 Aug 8;10:111. doi: 10.1186/s13012-015-0300-7.
7
Barriers and enablers to delivery of the Healthy Kids Check: an analysis informed by the Theoretical Domains Framework and COM-B model.实现健康儿童检查的障碍和促进因素:基于理论领域框架和 COM-B 模型的分析。
Implement Sci. 2014 May 23;9:60. doi: 10.1186/1748-5908-9-60.
8
Childhood obesity prevention: a review of school nurse perceptions and practices.儿童肥胖预防:对学校护士认知与实践的综述
J Spec Pediatr Nurs. 2014 Jul;19(3):198-209. doi: 10.1111/jspn.12071. Epub 2014 Mar 11.
9
Weighing children; parents agree, but GPs conflicted.给儿童称重;家长意见一致,但全科医生存在分歧。
Arch Dis Child. 2014 Jun;99(6):543-5. doi: 10.1136/archdischild-2013-304090. Epub 2014 Jan 15.
10
Making every contact count: an evaluation.尽最大可能接触每一个人:评估。
Public Health. 2013 Jul;127(7):653-60. doi: 10.1016/j.puhe.2013.04.013. Epub 2013 Jun 28.