HIV Cure Research Center, Department of General Internal Medicine, Ghent University Hospital, Ghent University, Ghent 9000, Belgium.
KU Leuven, Department of Microbiology and Immunology, Rega Institute, Laboratory of Evolutionary and Computational Virology, Herestraat 49, Leuven 3000 Belgium.
Cell Host Microbe. 2019 Sep 11;26(3):347-358.e7. doi: 10.1016/j.chom.2019.08.003. Epub 2019 Aug 27.
Viral rebound upon stopping combined antiretroviral therapy poses a major barrier toward an HIV cure. Cellular and anatomical sources responsible for reinitiating viral replication remain a subject of ardent debate, despite extensive research efforts. To unravel the source of rebounding viruses, we conducted a large-scale HIV-STAR (HIV-1 sequencing before analytical treatment interruption to identify the anatomically relevant HIV reservoir) clinical trial. We collected samples from 11 participants and compared the genetic composition of (pro)viruses collected under treatment from different cellular and anatomical compartments with that of plasma viruses sampled during analytical treatment interruption. We found a remarkably heterogeneous source of viral rebound. In addition, irrespective of the compartment or cell subset, genetically identical viral expansions played a significant role in viral rebound. Our study suggests that although there does not seem to be a primary source for rebound HIV, cellular proliferation is an important driver of HIV persistence and should therefore be considered in future curative strategies.
停止联合抗逆转录病毒疗法后病毒反弹是实现 HIV 治愈的主要障碍。尽管进行了广泛的研究,但负责重新启动病毒复制的细胞和解剖学来源仍是激烈争论的主题。为了解开反弹病毒的来源,我们进行了一项大规模的 HIV-STAR(在分析性治疗中断前进行 HIV-1 测序以确定与解剖学相关的 HIV 储存库)临床试验。我们收集了 11 名参与者的样本,并比较了治疗期间从不同细胞和解剖学隔室采集的(前)病毒与分析性治疗中断期间从血浆中采样的病毒的遗传组成。我们发现病毒反弹的来源非常异质。此外,无论隔室或细胞亚群如何,遗传上相同的病毒扩增在病毒反弹中起着重要作用。我们的研究表明,尽管似乎不存在反弹 HIV 的主要来源,但细胞增殖是 HIV 持续存在的重要驱动因素,因此应在未来的治愈策略中加以考虑。