Department of Medicine and the Department of Clinical Neuroscience, Karolinska Institutet, Stockholm, Sweden.
Department of Neurosurgery, Karolinska University Hospital, Stockholm, Sweden.
J Neurooncol. 2019 Oct;145(1):75-83. doi: 10.1007/s11060-019-03268-y. Epub 2019 Aug 30.
There has been a resurgence of interest in brachytherapy as a treatment for glioblastoma, with several currently ongoing clinical trials. To provide a foundation for the analysis of these trials, we analyze the Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results (SEER) database to determine whether receipt of brachytherapy conveys a survival benefit independent of traditional prognostic factors.
We identified 60,456 glioblastoma patients, of whom 362 underwent brachytherapy. We grouped patients based on receipt of brachytherapy and compared clinical and demographic variables between groups using Student's t-test and Pearson's chi-squared test. We assessed survival using Kaplan-Meier curves and Cox proportional hazards models.
Median overall survival was 16 months in patients who received brachytherapy compared to 9 months in those who did not (log-rank p < 0.001). Patients who underwent brachytherapy tended to be younger (p < 0.001), suffered from smaller tumors (< 4 cm, p < 0.001), and were more likely to have undergone gross total resection (GTR, p < 0.001). In univariable Cox models, these variables were independently associated with improved overall survival. Additionally, improved survival was associated with known receipt of chemotherapy (HR 0.459, p < 0.001), external beam radiation (HR 0.447, p < 0.001), and brachytherapy (HR 0.637, p < 0.001). The association between brachytherapy and improved survival remained robust (HR 0.859, p = 0.031) in a multivariable model that adjusted for patient age, tumor size, tumor location, GTR, receipt of chemotherapy, and receipt of external beam radiation.
Our SEER analysis indicates that brachytherapy is associated with improved survival in glioblastoma after controlling for age, tumor size/location, extent of resection, chemotherapy, and external beam radiation.
近距离放射治疗作为胶质母细胞瘤的一种治疗方法重新受到关注,目前正在进行多项临床试验。为了为这些试验的分析提供基础,我们分析了监测、流行病学和最终结果(SEER)数据库,以确定是否接受近距离放射治疗可以独立于传统的预后因素带来生存获益。
我们确定了 60456 名胶质母细胞瘤患者,其中 362 名患者接受了近距离放射治疗。我们根据是否接受近距离放射治疗对患者进行分组,并使用学生 t 检验和 Pearson 卡方检验比较组间的临床和人口统计学变量。我们使用 Kaplan-Meier 曲线和 Cox 比例风险模型评估生存情况。
接受近距离放射治疗的患者中位总生存期为 16 个月,而未接受近距离放射治疗的患者为 9 个月(对数秩检验 p<0.001)。接受近距离放射治疗的患者倾向于更年轻(p<0.001),肿瘤较小(<4cm,p<0.001),并且更有可能接受大体全切除(GTR,p<0.001)。在单变量 Cox 模型中,这些变量与总体生存改善独立相关。此外,已知接受化疗(HR 0.459,p<0.001)、外束放疗(HR 0.447,p<0.001)和近距离放射治疗(HR 0.637,p<0.001)与生存改善相关。在调整患者年龄、肿瘤大小、肿瘤位置、GTR、化疗和外束放疗的多变量模型中,近距离放射治疗与生存改善的相关性仍然稳健(HR 0.859,p=0.031)。
我们的 SEER 分析表明,在控制年龄、肿瘤大小/位置、切除程度、化疗和外束放疗后,近距离放射治疗与胶质母细胞瘤的生存改善相关。