• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

验证在线预测模型 CancerMath 在荷兰乳腺癌人群中的应用。

Validation of the online prediction model CancerMath in the Dutch breast cancer population.

机构信息

Department of Research, Netherlands Comprehensive Cancer Organisation, P.O. Box 19079, 3501 DB, Utrecht, The Netherlands.

Evidencio Medical Decision Support, Haaksbergen, The Netherlands.

出版信息

Breast Cancer Res Treat. 2019 Dec;178(3):665-681. doi: 10.1007/s10549-019-05399-2. Epub 2019 Aug 30.

DOI:10.1007/s10549-019-05399-2
PMID:31471837
Abstract

PURPOSE

CancerMath predicts the expected benefit of adjuvant systemic therapy on overall (OS) and breast cancer-specific survival (BCSS). Here, CancerMath was validated in Dutch breast cancer patients.

METHODS

All operated women diagnosed with stage I-III primary invasive breast cancer in 2005 were identified from the Netherlands Cancer Registry. Calibration was assessed by comparing 5- and 10-year predicted and observed OS/BCSS using χ tests. A difference > 3% was considered as clinically relevant. Discrimination was assessed by area under the receiver operating characteristic (AUC) curves.

RESULTS

Altogether, 8032 women were included. CancerMath underestimated 5- and 10-year OS by 2.2% and 1.9%, respectively. AUCs of 5- and 10-year OS were both 0.77. Divergence between predicted and observed OS was most pronounced in grade II, patients without positive nodes, tumours 1.01-2.00 cm, hormonal receptor positive disease and patients 60-69 years. CancerMath underestimated 5- and 10-year BCSS by 0.5% and 0.6%, respectively. AUCs were 0.78 and 0.73, respectively. No significant difference was found in any subgroup.

CONCLUSION

CancerMath predicts OS accurately for most patients with early breast cancer although outcomes should be interpreted with care in some subgroups. BCSS is predicted accurately in all subgroups. Therefore, CancerMath can reliably be used in (Dutch) clinical practice.

摘要

目的

CancerMath 预测辅助全身治疗对总生存期(OS)和乳腺癌特异性生存期(BCSS)的预期获益。在此,在荷兰乳腺癌患者中验证了 CancerMath。

方法

从荷兰癌症登记处确定了所有在 2005 年被诊断为 I-III 期原发性浸润性乳腺癌的手术女性患者。通过使用 χ 检验比较 5 年和 10 年预测的和观察的 OS/BCSS,评估校准。如果差异大于 3%,则认为具有临床意义。通过接受者操作特征(ROC)曲线下的面积来评估区分度。

结果

总共纳入了 8032 名女性患者。CancerMath 分别低估了 5 年和 10 年的 OS 率 2.2%和 1.9%。5 年和 10 年 OS 的 AUC 均为 0.77。在 II 级、无阳性淋巴结的患者、肿瘤直径为 1.01-2.00cm、激素受体阳性疾病和 60-69 岁的患者中,预测的 OS 与观察的 OS 之间的差异最为明显。CancerMath 分别低估了 5 年和 10 年的 BCSS 率 0.5%和 0.6%。AUC 分别为 0.78 和 0.73。在任何亚组中均未发现显著差异。

结论

CancerMath 能够准确预测大多数早期乳腺癌患者的 OS,但在某些亚组中,结果应谨慎解释。在所有亚组中,BCSS 都被准确预测。因此,CancerMath 可在(荷兰)临床实践中可靠使用。

相似文献

1
Validation of the online prediction model CancerMath in the Dutch breast cancer population.验证在线预测模型 CancerMath 在荷兰乳腺癌人群中的应用。
Breast Cancer Res Treat. 2019 Dec;178(3):665-681. doi: 10.1007/s10549-019-05399-2. Epub 2019 Aug 30.
2
Validation of the online prediction tool PREDICT v. 2.0 in the Dutch breast cancer population.在线预测工具PREDICT v. 2.0在荷兰乳腺癌人群中的验证。
Eur J Cancer. 2017 Nov;86:364-372. doi: 10.1016/j.ejca.2017.09.031. Epub 2017 Nov 5.
3
Validation of the CancerMath prognostic tool for breast cancer in Southeast Asia.东南亚乳腺癌CancerMath预后工具的验证
BMC Cancer. 2016 Oct 21;16(1):820. doi: 10.1186/s12885-016-2841-9.
4
Calibration and discriminatory accuracy of prognosis calculation for breast cancer with the online Adjuvant! program: a hospital-based retrospective cohort study.使用在线辅助!程序对乳腺癌预后计算进行校准和鉴别准确性评估:一项基于医院的回顾性队列研究。
Lancet Oncol. 2009 Nov;10(11):1070-6. doi: 10.1016/S1470-2045(09)70254-2. Epub 2009 Oct 2.
5
A Comparison Between the Online Prediction Models CancerMath and PREDICT as Prognostic Tools in Thai Breast Cancer Patients.泰国乳腺癌患者中在线预测模型CancerMath和PREDICT作为预后工具的比较
Cancer Manag Res. 2020 Jul 8;12:5549-5559. doi: 10.2147/CMAR.S258143. eCollection 2020.
6
Development and External Validation of Prediction Models for 10-Year Survival of Invasive Breast Cancer. Comparison with PREDICT and CancerMath.发展和验证预测浸润性乳腺癌 10 年生存率的模型,并与 PREDICT 和 CancerMath 进行比较。
Clin Cancer Res. 2018 May 1;24(9):2110-2115. doi: 10.1158/1078-0432.CCR-17-3542. Epub 2018 Feb 14.
7
Facilitating validation of prediction models: a comparison of manual and semi-automated validation using registry-based data of breast cancer patients in the Netherlands.促进预测模型的验证:使用荷兰基于注册的乳腺癌患者数据的手动和半自动验证比较。
BMC Med Res Methodol. 2019 Jun 8;19(1):117. doi: 10.1186/s12874-019-0761-5.
8
A population-based validation of the prognostic model PREDICT for early breast cancer.基于人群的早期乳腺癌预后模型 PREDICT 的验证。
Eur J Surg Oncol. 2011 May;37(5):411-7. doi: 10.1016/j.ejso.2011.02.001. Epub 2011 Mar 2.
9
Breast cancer-related deaths according to grade in ductal carcinoma in situ: A Dutch population-based study on patients diagnosed between 1999 and 2012.基于人群的研究:1999 年至 2012 年间诊断为导管原位癌的患者,根据分级的乳腺癌相关死亡。
Eur J Cancer. 2018 Sep;101:134-142. doi: 10.1016/j.ejca.2018.07.003. Epub 2018 Jul 28.
10
Independent validation of the PREDICT breast cancer prognosis prediction tool in 45,789 patients using Scottish Cancer Registry data.利用苏格兰癌症登记处的数据对 PREDICT 乳腺癌预后预测工具在 45789 名患者中的独立验证。
Br J Cancer. 2018 Oct;119(7):808-814. doi: 10.1038/s41416-018-0256-x. Epub 2018 Sep 17.

引用本文的文献

1
Insights into the performance of PREDICT tool in a large Mainland Chinese breast cancer cohort: a comparative analysis of versions 3.0 and 2.2.深入探究 PREDICT 工具在中国大陆大型乳腺癌队列中的表现:版本 3.0 与 2.2 的对比分析。
Oncologist. 2024 Aug 5;29(8):e976-e983. doi: 10.1093/oncolo/oyae164.
2
Gene expression profiles in clinically T1-2N0 ER+HER2- breast cancer patients treated with breast-conserving therapy: their added value in case sentinel lymph node biopsy is not performed.保乳治疗的 T1-2N0 ER+HER2- 期乳腺癌患者的基因表达谱:在未行前哨淋巴结活检时的附加价值。
Breast Cancer Res Treat. 2024 Jan;203(1):103-110. doi: 10.1007/s10549-023-07128-2. Epub 2023 Oct 5.
3
Theory and Practice of Integrating Machine Learning and Conventional Statistics in Medical Data Analysis.
机器学习与传统统计学在医学数据分析中的整合理论与实践
Diagnostics (Basel). 2022 Oct 18;12(10):2526. doi: 10.3390/diagnostics12102526.
4
A scoping review of interactive and personalized web-based clinical tools to support treatment decision making in breast cancer.交互式和个性化的基于网络的临床工具在乳腺癌治疗决策支持中的应用:范围综述。
Breast. 2022 Feb;61:43-57. doi: 10.1016/j.breast.2021.12.003. Epub 2021 Dec 6.
5
Predicting of Sentinel Lymph Node Status in Breast Cancer Patients with Clinically Negative Nodes: A Validation Study.临床腋窝淋巴结阴性乳腺癌患者前哨淋巴结状态的预测:一项验证研究
Cancers (Basel). 2021 Jan 19;13(2):352. doi: 10.3390/cancers13020352.