The University of Memphis, United States.
Touro College School of Social Work, United States.
J Fluency Disord. 2019 Sep;61:105714. doi: 10.1016/j.jfludis.2019.105714. Epub 2019 Aug 21.
Motor theories indicate that focusing attention on well-practiced movements interferes with skilled performance; however, specific forms of attention (alerting vs. orienting vs. executive control) associated with this effect are not well understood. The present study explored this question in relation to stuttering, and examined whether dual task conditions that engaged sustained attention or working memory (WM) affected speech fluency in different ways. We also considered whether fluency changes were associated with changes in speech rate and language.
Nineteen adults who stutter (AWS) and 20 controls produced spontaneous speech under a baseline condition and two dual task conditions: one involving a sustained attention task, the other involving WM demands.
Both groups produced fewer stutter-like disfluencies under dual task relative to baseline conditions and this reduction did not differ between the two dual tasks (attention vs. WM). Speech rate and language variables, which were potentially influenced by attention conditions, were not affected by dual tasks in the same way as disfluencies, and appeared to be unassociated with fluency results.
Findings indicate that atypical disfluencies decrease when attention is divided, even when secondary task demands are minimal, as they were in the sustained attention task. For simple secondary tasks, fluency changes do not appear to be a byproduct of slowed rate and are not accompanied by observable changes in language. These results demonstrate that simple manipulations of attention can induce measurable effects on aspects of speech production, and may be a useful tool for facilitating fluency in clinical intervention.
运动理论表明,将注意力集中在熟练的动作上会干扰熟练的表现;然而,与这种效应相关的特定形式的注意力(警觉、定向和执行控制)尚不清楚。本研究探讨了与口吃相关的问题,并研究了是否参与持续注意力或工作记忆(WM)的双重任务条件会以不同的方式影响言语流畅度。我们还考虑了流畅性变化是否与言语速度和语言变化有关。
19 名口吃者(AWS)和 20 名对照者在基线条件和两种双重任务条件下进行自发言语:一种涉及持续注意力任务,另一种涉及 WM 需求。
两组在双重任务条件下比基线条件下产生的口吃样不流畅性更少,并且两种双重任务(注意力与 WM)之间的减少没有差异。可能受到注意力条件影响的言语速度和语言变量,与双重任务的影响方式不同,与不流畅性结果似乎没有关联。
研究结果表明,即使在注意力任务需求最小的情况下,当注意力被分散时,不流畅性也会减少,就像在持续注意力任务中一样。对于简单的次要任务,流畅性变化似乎不是语速减慢的副产品,并且语言没有明显变化。这些结果表明,简单的注意力操纵可以对言语产生方面产生可测量的影响,并且可能是促进临床干预中流畅性的有用工具。