Camilleri Andrew, Abarno Damien, Bird Carolyne, Coxon Anne, Mitchell Natasha, Redman Kahlee, Sly Nicol, Wills Stephen, Silenieks Edmund, Simpson Ellie, Lindsay Heather
Forensic Science SA, GPO Box 2790, Adelaide, SA 5001, Australia.
Forensic Science SA, GPO Box 2790, Adelaide, SA 5001, Australia.
Sci Justice. 2019 Sep;59(5):533-543. doi: 10.1016/j.scijus.2019.04.003. Epub 2019 Apr 30.
Over the past decade, the potential impact of cognitive bias in forensic science has instigated much discussion and debate between academics, scientists and those in the justice sector. Evidence of bias influencing subjective decision-making across a range of forensic disciplines has been described in the literature. Forensic service organisations are being urged to address cognitive bias in subjective decision-making by designing processes or procedures to limit access to (irrelevant) contextual information or reduce dependence on cognitive functions. Although some laboratories have implemented bias mitigating strategies, with varying impact on operational efficiency, there has been no systematic assessment of the risk posed by cognitive bias. Forensic Science SA assessed the potential impact of bias on forensic interpretations across multiple disciplines, using a risk management framework. This process proved useful in assessing the effectiveness of existing bias mitigating strategies and identified the latent level of risk posed. While all forensic organisations should seek to implement bias limiting measures that are simple, cost-effective and do not adversely impact efficiency, using a risk-based approach has contextualised the limited benefit of introducing resource hungry measures, as postulated in the literature. That is not to suggest that forensic organisations should dismiss the potential influence of cognitive bias but they need to strike an appropriate balance between risk and return, as they do with any business risk.
在过去十年中,认知偏差在法医学中的潜在影响引发了学术界、科学家和司法部门之间的诸多讨论与辩论。文献中已描述了偏差影响一系列法医学科主观决策的证据。有人敦促法医服务机构通过设计流程或程序来限制获取(无关的)背景信息或减少对认知功能的依赖,以解决主观决策中的认知偏差问题。尽管一些实验室已经实施了减轻偏差的策略,对运营效率产生了不同程度的影响,但尚未对认知偏差所带来的风险进行系统评估。南澳大利亚法医科学局使用风险管理框架评估了偏差对多学科法医鉴定的潜在影响。这一过程在评估现有减轻偏差策略的有效性以及识别潜在风险水平方面被证明是有用的。虽然所有法医机构都应寻求实施简单、具有成本效益且不会对效率产生不利影响的偏差限制措施,但正如文献中所假设的那样,采用基于风险的方法已将引入消耗资源措施的有限益处置于具体情境中。这并不是说法医机构应忽视认知偏差的潜在影响,而是说他们需要像对待任何商业风险一样,在风险与回报之间找到适当的平衡。