Center for Health Assessment Research and Translation, University of Delaware College of Health Sciences, Newark, Delaware, United States.
Center for Health Assessment Research and Translation, University of Delaware College of Health Sciences, Newark, Delaware, United States; Department of Psychological & Brain Sciences, University of Delaware, Newark, Delaware, United States; Department of Physical Therapy, University of Delaware, Newark, Delaware, United States.
Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 2020 Jan;101(1):33-42. doi: 10.1016/j.apmr.2019.08.469. Epub 2019 Aug 29.
To develop an item response theory (IRT)-calibrated, patient-reported outcome measure of subjective independence for individuals with traumatic brain injury (TBI).
Large-scale item calibration field testing; confirmatory factor analysis (CFA) and graded response model IRT analyses.
Five TBI Model System centers across the United States.
Adults with complicated mild, moderate, or severe TBI (N=556).
Traumatic Brain Injury-Quality of Life (TBI-QOL) Independence item bank and the TBI-QOL Asking for Help scale.
A total of 556 individuals completed 44 items in the Independence item pool. Initial factor analyses indicated that items related to the idea of "asking for help" were measuring a different construct from other items in the pool. These 9 items were set aside. Twenty-two other items were removed because of bimodal distributions and/or low item-total correlations. CFA supported unidimensionality of the remaining Independence items. Graded response model IRT analysis was used to estimate slopes and thresholds for the final 13 Independence items. An 8-item fixed-length short form was also developed. The 9 Asking for Help items were analyzed separately. One misfitting item was deleted, and the final 8 items became a fixed-length IRT-calibrated scale. Reliability was high for both measures.
The IRT-calibrated TBI-QOL Independence item bank and short form and TBI-QOL Asking for Help scale may be used to measure important issues for individuals with TBI in research and clinical applications.
开发一种基于项目反应理论(IRT)的、针对创伤性脑损伤(TBI)患者主观独立性的患者报告结局测量工具。
大规模项目校准现场测试;验证性因子分析(CFA)和分级反应模型 IRT 分析。
美国五个 TBI 模型系统中心。
患有复杂轻度、中度或重度 TBI 的成年人(N=556)。
创伤性脑损伤生活质量问卷(TBI-QOL)独立性项目库和 TBI-QOL 请求帮助量表。
共有 556 名个体完成了 44 项独立性项目库中的项目。初始因子分析表明,与“寻求帮助”概念相关的项目与项目库中的其他项目测量的是不同的构念。这 9 个项目被搁置。由于双峰分布和/或项目总分相关性低,另外 22 个项目被删除。CFA 支持剩余独立性项目的单维性。分级反应模型 IRT 分析用于估计最终 13 个独立性项目的斜率和阈值。还开发了一个 8 项固定长度的简短形式。9 个求助项目单独进行分析。一个拟合不良的项目被删除,最后 8 个项目成为一个固定长度的 IRT 校准量表。这两个测量工具的可靠性都很高。
IRT 校准的 TBI-QOL 独立性项目库和简短形式以及 TBI-QOL 请求帮助量表可用于研究和临床应用中测量 TBI 患者的重要问题。