Department of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, Michigan, United States.
Center for Health Assessment Research and Translation, University of Delaware College of Health Sciences, Newark, Delaware, United States.
Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 2020 Jan;101(1):11-19. doi: 10.1016/j.apmr.2019.07.019. Epub 2019 Sep 25.
To develop a pain interference item bank, computer adaptive test (CAT), and short form for use by individuals with traumatic brain injury (TBI).
Cross-sectional survey study.
Five TBI Model Systems rehabilitation hospitals.
Individuals with TBI (N=590).
Not applicable.
Traumatic Brain Injury-Quality of Life (TBI-QOL) Pain Interference item bank.
Confirmatory factor analysis provided evidence of a single underlying trait (χ [740]=3254.030; P<.001; Comparative Fix Index=0.988; Tucker-Lewis Index=0.980; Root Mean Square Error of Approximation=0.076) and a graded response model (GRM) supported item fit of 40 Pain Interference items. Items did not exhibit differential item functioning or local item dependence. GRM calibration data were used to inform the selection of a 10-item static short form and to program a TBI-QOL Pain Interference CAT. Comparative analyses indicated excellent comparability and reliability across test administration formats.
The 40-item TBI-QOL Pain Interference item bank demonstrated strong psychometric properties. End users can administer this measure as either a 10-item short form or CAT.
开发一个疼痛干扰项目库、计算机自适应测试(CAT)和简短形式,供创伤性脑损伤(TBI)患者使用。
横断面调查研究。
五个 TBI 模型系统康复医院。
创伤性脑损伤患者(N=590)。
不适用。
创伤性脑损伤生活质量问卷(TBI-QOL)疼痛干扰项目库。
验证性因子分析提供了单一潜在特质的证据(χ[740]=3254.030;P<.001;比较固定指数=0.988;塔克-刘易斯指数=0.980;均方根误差逼近=0.076)和等级反应模型(GRM)支持 40 个疼痛干扰项目的项目拟合。项目没有表现出差异项目功能或局部项目依赖。GRM 校准数据用于告知 10 项静态简短形式的选择,并为 TBI-QOL 疼痛干扰 CAT 编程。比较分析表明,在测试管理格式方面具有出色的可比性和可靠性。
40 项 TBI-QOL 疼痛干扰项目库表现出良好的心理测量特性。最终用户可以将该测量作为 10 项简短形式或 CAT 进行管理。