Department of Epidemiology and Health Statistics, Hangzhou Medical College School of Public Health, Hangzhou, China.
Department of Non-Communicable Disease Epidemiology, London School of Hygiene & Tropical Medicine, London, UK.
Environ Int. 2019 Nov;132:105108. doi: 10.1016/j.envint.2019.105108. Epub 2019 Aug 29.
There has been increasing interest in associations between neighborhood food environments and cardiovascular risk factors. However, results from high-income countries remain inconsistent, and there has been limited research from low- and middle-income countries. We conducted a cross-sectional analysis of the third wave follow-up of the Andhra Pradesh children and parents study (APCAPS) (n = 5764, median age 28.8 years) in south India. We examined associations between the neighborhood availability (vendor density per km within 400 m and 1600 m buffers of households) and accessibility (distance from the household to the nearest vendor) of fruit/vegetable and highly processed/take-away food vendors with 11 cardiovascular risk factors, including adiposity measures, glucose-insulin, blood pressure, and lipid profile. In fully adjusted models, higher density of fruit/vegetable vendors within 400 m of participant households was associated with lower systolic blood pressure [-0.09 mmHg, 95% confidence interval (CI): -0.17, -0.02] and diastolic blood pressure (-0.10 mmHg, 95% CI: -0.17, -0.04). Higher density of highly processed/take-away food vendors within 400 m of participant households was associated with higher Body Mass Index (0.01 Kg/m, 95% CI: 0.00, 0.01), waist circumference (0.22 mm, 95% CI: 0.05, 0.39), systolic blood pressure (0.03 mmHg, 95% CI: 0.01, 0.06), and diastolic blood pressure (0.03 mmHg, 95% CI: 0.01, 0.05). However, within 1600 m buffer, only association with blood pressure remained robust. No associations were found for between neighborhood accessibility and cardiovascular risk factors. Lower density of fruit/vegetable vendors, and higher density of highly processed/take-away food vendors were associated with adverse cardiovascular risk profiles. Public health policies regarding neighborhood food environments should be encouraged in south India and other rural communities in south Asia.
人们对邻里食品环境与心血管风险因素之间的关联越来越感兴趣。然而,来自高收入国家的研究结果仍然不一致,来自中低收入国家的研究也很有限。我们对印度南部安得拉邦儿童和家长研究(APCAPS)的第三波随访进行了横断面分析(n=5764,中位年龄 28.8 岁)。我们研究了家庭 400 米和 1600 米缓冲区以内(距家庭最近的供应商的距离)水果/蔬菜供应商和高度加工/外卖食品供应商的分布(供应商密度/每公里)与 11 个心血管风险因素(包括肥胖指标、血糖-胰岛素、血压和血脂谱)之间的关联。在完全调整的模型中,家庭 400 米以内水果/蔬菜供应商的密度较高与收缩压[-0.09mmHg,95%置信区间(CI):-0.17,-0.02]和舒张压[-0.10mmHg,95%CI:-0.17,-0.04]降低有关。家庭 400 米以内高度加工/外卖食品供应商的密度较高与身体质量指数(BMI)(0.01kg/m,95%CI:0.00,0.01)、腰围(0.22mm,95%CI:0.05,0.39)、收缩压(0.03mmHg,95%CI:0.01,0.06)和舒张压(0.03mmHg,95%CI:0.01,0.05)升高有关。然而,在 1600 米缓冲区,只有血压与密度之间的关联仍然具有统计学意义。邻里可及性与心血管风险因素之间没有发现关联。水果/蔬菜供应商密度较低,高度加工/外卖食品供应商密度较高与不良心血管风险特征有关。应鼓励在印度南部和南亚其他农村社区实施有关邻里食品环境的公共卫生政策。