Department of Economics and Management, University of Brescia, Via San Faustino 74b, 25122, Brescia, Italy.
DIEC - Department of Economics and Business Studies, University of Genoa, Via Vivaldi 5, 16126, Genoa, Italy.
Eur J Health Econ. 2020 Feb;21(1):37-44. doi: 10.1007/s10198-019-01107-5. Epub 2019 Aug 31.
Inappropriate emergency admissions create overcrowding and may reduce the quality of emergency care. In Italy, overcrowding is further exacerbated by patients who use emergency admissions as a shortcut to avoid the general practitioner (GP) gateway. In this paper, we investigate access to emergency departments (EDs) by patients with non-severe medical conditions and their willingness to wait. Population data for ED accesses in Liguria (an Italian administrative region) in 2016 were used to estimate the number of strategic accesses and waiting time elasticities of low-severity patients. Our results show that the practice of using EDs to skip gatekeeping is a serious problem. The percentage of patients who engage in such practice vary from 8.7 to 9.9% of non-urgent patients; they generally prefer to access more specialized hospitals, especially during weekdays, when GPs are available, but hospitals run at full capacity. Strategic patients are usually much younger than average. From a policy point of view, our results show that long waits may discourage "genuine" patients rather than strategic ones. It is necessary to develop a system to improve access to patients mainly requiring specialist care, along with enhancing the management of diagnostic examinations through primary care.
不适当的急诊入院会导致过度拥挤,并可能降低急诊护理的质量。在意大利,由于患者将急诊入院作为避开全科医生(GP)入口的捷径,这种情况进一步加剧了过度拥挤的问题。在本文中,我们研究了患有非严重医疗条件的患者进入急诊部(ED)的途径及其等待意愿。我们使用 2016 年利古里亚(意大利行政区)的 ED 就诊人口数据来估计战略就诊人数和低严重程度患者的等待时间弹性。我们的结果表明,利用 ED 跳过把关的做法是一个严重的问题。这种做法的患者比例占非紧急患者的 8.7%至 9.9%;他们通常更愿意去更专业的医院就诊,特别是在工作日,全科医生上班,但医院满负荷运转的时候。战略患者通常比平均年龄小得多。从政策角度来看,我们的结果表明,长时间的等待可能会使“真正”的患者望而却步,而不是战略患者。有必要建立一个系统,以改善主要需要专科护理的患者的就诊途径,同时通过初级保健加强诊断检查的管理。