Baker Fadi Abu, Mari Amir, Nafrin Smadar, Suki Muhammed, Ovadia Baruch, Gal Oren, Kopelamn Yael
Department of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Hillel Yaffe Medical Center, Hadera, Israel, Affiliated to the Technion Faculty of Medicine, Haifa, Israel.
Department of Gastroenterology, Nazareth EMMS Hospital, Affiliated to the Faculty of Medicine, Bar Illan University, Israel.
Ann Gastroenterol. 2019 Sep-Oct;32(5):457-462. doi: 10.20524/aog.2019.0400. Epub 2019 Jul 6.
Inadequate bowel preparation is still the main obstacle to a complete colonoscopy in many patients and necessitates many repeated procedures. We aimed to identify risk factors associated with inadequate bowel preparation and to better characterize these patients.
This was a retrospective study that reviewed electronic reports of colonoscopy procedures over a 10-year period. Patients were divided into 2 groups: adequate vs. non-adequate bowel preparation. A multivariate analysis was performed to identify variables associated with inadequate bowel preparation, including age, sex, setting (inpatient/outpatient), preparation regimen and procedures' indications. We examined the effect of inadequate preparation on colonoscopy quality indicators.
Of the 28,725 patients included in the study, 6,702 (23.3%) had inadequate bowel preparation. In the multivariate analysis, advanced age (odds ratio [OR] 1.015, 95% confidence interval [CI] 1.013-1.017; P<0.01), male sex (OR 1.353, 95%CI 1.286-1.423; P<0.01) and a minority population (OR 1.635, 95%CI 1.531-1.746; P<0.01) were significantly associated with inadequate bowel preparation. The inpatient setting was among the most prominent factors associated with inadequate bowel preparation (OR 2.018, 95%CI 1.884-2.163; P<0.01). Adequate bowel preparation was associated with a higher polyp detection rate (26.8% vs. 23.6%; OR 1.22, 95%CI 1.109-1.347; P<0.01) and colorectal cancer (2.8% vs. 2.4%; OR 1.402, 95%CI 1.146-1.716; P<0.01), and higher frequencies of cecal (96.4% vs. 73.5%; OR 2.243, 95%CI 2.095-2.403; P<0.01) and terminal ileum intubation (8.1% vs. 5.4%; OR 1.243, 95%CI 1.088-1.434; P<0.01).
We outlined various factors associated with inadequate bowel preparation and confirmed its adverse effect on colonoscopy quality indicators.
肠道准备不充分仍是许多患者进行完整结肠镜检查的主要障碍,并且需要多次重复检查。我们旨在确定与肠道准备不充分相关的风险因素,并更好地描述这些患者的特征。
这是一项回顾性研究,回顾了10年间结肠镜检查的电子报告。患者分为两组:肠道准备充分组与不充分组。进行多变量分析以确定与肠道准备不充分相关的变量,包括年龄、性别、检查地点(住院/门诊)、准备方案和检查指征。我们研究了准备不充分对结肠镜检查质量指标的影响。
在纳入研究的28725例患者中,6702例(23.3%)肠道准备不充分。在多变量分析中,高龄(比值比[OR]1.015,95%置信区间[CI]1.013 - 1.017;P<0.01)、男性(OR 1.353,95%CI 1.286 - 1.423;P<0.01)和少数族裔(OR 1.635,95%CI 1.531 - 1.746;P<0.01)与肠道准备不充分显著相关。住院检查是与肠道准备不充分相关的最显著因素之一(OR 2.018,95%CI 1.884 - 2.163;P<0.01)。充分的肠道准备与更高的息肉检出率(26.8%对23.6%;OR 1.22,95%CI 1.109 - 1.347;P<0.01)、结直肠癌(2.8%对2.4%;OR 1.402,95%CI 1.146 - 1.716;P<0.01)以及更高的盲肠插管率(96.4%对73.5%;OR 2.243,95%CI 2.095 - 2.403;P<0.01)和回肠末端插管率(8.1%对5.4%;OR 1.243,95%CI 1.088 - 1.434;P<0.01)相关。
我们概述了与肠道准备不充分相关的各种因素,并证实了其对结肠镜检查质量指标的不利影响。