• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

新型口服硫酸片与传统口服硫酸片用于结肠镜检查肠道准备的比较:一项前瞻性、随机、研究者设盲、多中心、非劣效性3期试验。

Comparison of a novel mini-oral sulfate tablet and the conventional oral sulfate tablet in bowel preparation for colonoscopy: a prospective, randomized, investigator-blinded, multicenter, non-inferior, phase 3 trial.

作者信息

Jeon Seong Ran, Park Soo-Kyung, Yang Dong-Hoon, Cha Jae Myung

机构信息

Institute of Digestive Research, Digestive Disease Center, Soonchunhyang University College of Medicine, Seoul, Korea.

Department of Gastroenterology, Kangbuk Samsung Hospital, Sungkyunkwan University School of Medicine, Seoul, Korea.

出版信息

J Gastroenterol. 2023 Nov;58(11):1114-1123. doi: 10.1007/s00535-023-02023-5. Epub 2023 Aug 5.

DOI:10.1007/s00535-023-02023-5
PMID:37542674
Abstract

BACKGROUND AND AIMS

The use of conventional oral sulfate tablets (OSTs) has gained popularity; nonetheless, they may be not only inconvenient to swallow but also difficult to dissolve. A novel mini-OST has recently been developed to enhance compliance with conventional OST use. This study aimed to compare the efficacy, tolerability, and safety between mini-OST and conventional OST.

METHODS

This was a prospective, randomized, investigator-blinded, multicenter, and non-inferior phase 3 trial conducted between September 2022 and December 2022. The efficacy, safety, and tolerability were compared between mini-OST and conventional OST.

RESULTS

Exactly 83 patients were evaluated based on a full analysis set (FAS), whereas 82 patients were evaluated as a per-protocol set (PPS). With respect to the efficacy of preparation, successful and high-quality preparation was excellent in the mini-OST and conventional OST groups on both FAS and PPS analyses, without significant differences between the two groups. On the FAS analysis, the satisfaction and tolerability scores were high in both groups, without significant differences. The first bowel movement after taking the investigational product occurred 30 min earlier in the mini-OST group than in the OST group. Mild, moderate, and severe adverse events (AEs) were comparable between the two groups; however, any AEs were more common in the mini-OST group than in the conventional OST group overall.

CONCLUSIONS

Compared with conventional OST, the novel mini-OST preparation showed similar efficacy, tolerability, and safety, including mild eight solicited AEs and moderate-to-severe AEs. Clinical trial registration NCT05670470.

摘要

背景与目的

传统口服硫酸片(OSTs)的使用已越来越普遍;然而,它们不仅吞咽不便,而且难以溶解。最近研发出一种新型迷你OST,以提高对传统OST使用的依从性。本研究旨在比较迷你OST与传统OST在疗效、耐受性和安全性方面的差异。

方法

这是一项前瞻性、随机、研究者设盲、多中心、非劣效性3期试验,于2022年9月至2022年12月进行。比较了迷你OST与传统OST在疗效、安全性和耐受性方面的差异。

结果

基于全分析集(FAS)对83例患者进行了评估,而按符合方案集(PPS)评估的患者有82例。在制剂疗效方面,在FAS和PPS分析中,迷你OST组和传统OST组的成功和高质量制剂情况均良好,两组之间无显著差异。在FAS分析中,两组的满意度和耐受性评分均较高,无显著差异。服用研究产品后的首次排便,迷你OST组比OST组提前30分钟。两组的轻度、中度和重度不良事件(AE)相当;然而,总体而言,迷你OST组的任何AE比传统OST组更常见。

结论

与传统OST相比,新型迷你OST制剂在疗效、耐受性和安全性方面表现相似,包括轻度8种预期AE和中重度AE。临床试验注册号NCT05670470。

相似文献

1
Comparison of a novel mini-oral sulfate tablet and the conventional oral sulfate tablet in bowel preparation for colonoscopy: a prospective, randomized, investigator-blinded, multicenter, non-inferior, phase 3 trial.新型口服硫酸片与传统口服硫酸片用于结肠镜检查肠道准备的比较:一项前瞻性、随机、研究者设盲、多中心、非劣效性3期试验。
J Gastroenterol. 2023 Nov;58(11):1114-1123. doi: 10.1007/s00535-023-02023-5. Epub 2023 Aug 5.
2
A Safety and Efficacy Comparison of a New Sulfate-Based Tablet Bowel Preparation Versus a PEG and Ascorbate Comparator in Adult Subjects Undergoing Colonoscopy.一种新型硫酸盐片剂肠道准备与 PEG 和抗坏血酸盐对照剂在接受结肠镜检查的成年受试者中的安全性和疗效比较。
Am J Gastroenterol. 2021 Feb 1;116(2):319-328. doi: 10.14309/ajg.0000000000001020.
3
Efficacy, safety and tolerability of oral sulphate tablet for bowel preparation in patients with inflammatory bowel disease: A multicentre randomized controlled study.口服硫酸盐片用于炎症性肠病患者肠道准备的有效性、安全性和耐受性:一项多中心随机对照研究。
J Crohns Colitis. 2022 Nov 23;16(11):1706-1713. doi: 10.1093/ecco-jcc/jjac080.
4
Comparison of the efficacy and safety between oral sulfate tablet and polyethylene glycol for bowel preparation before colonoscopy according to age.根据年龄比较口服硫酸盐片和聚乙二醇用于结肠镜检查前肠道准备的疗效和安全性。
Medicine (Baltimore). 2022 Jul 8;101(27):e29884. doi: 10.1097/MD.0000000000029884.
5
Efficacy and safety of oral sulfate tablet vs. polyethylene glycol and ascorbate for bowel preparation in children.口服硫酸片剂与聚乙二醇和抗坏血酸盐用于儿童肠道准备的疗效和安全性比较
Front Pediatr. 2024 Feb 8;12:1277083. doi: 10.3389/fped.2024.1277083. eCollection 2024.
6
Novel sulfate tablet PBK-1701TC versus oral sulfate solution for colon cleansing: A randomized phase 3 trial.新型硫酸盐片剂 PBK-1701TC 与口服硫酸盐溶液用于结肠清洁:一项随机 3 期试验。
J Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2020 Jan;35(1):29-36. doi: 10.1111/jgh.14826. Epub 2019 Oct 7.
7
Efficacy of oral sulfate tablets for bowel preparation and adenoma detection rate.口服硫酸片剂用于肠道准备及腺瘤检出率的疗效
J Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2023 Mar;38(3):410-415. doi: 10.1111/jgh.16079. Epub 2022 Dec 12.
8
Taking Oral Sulfate Tablets with Simethicone for Bowel Preparation Leads to Higher Adenoma Detection Rate than Polyethylene Glycol: A Propensity Score Analysis.服用含西甲硅油的口服硫酸盐片进行肠道准备比服用聚乙二醇导致更高的腺瘤检出率:一项倾向评分分析。
Dig Dis Sci. 2023 Mar;68(3):867-876. doi: 10.1007/s10620-022-07611-8. Epub 2022 Jul 4.
9
Comparative Evaluation of the Efficacy of Polyethylene Glycol With Ascorbic Acid and an Oral Sulfate Solution in a Split Method for Bowel Preparation: A Randomized, Multicenter Phase III Clinical Trial.聚乙二醇联合抗坏血酸与口服硫酸盐溶液分阶段肠道准备效果的比较评估:一项随机、多中心III期临床试验
Dis Colon Rectum. 2017 Apr;60(4):426-432. doi: 10.1097/DCR.0000000000000759.
10
[Hyponatremic Seizure after Ingestion of an Oral Sulfate Tablet for Bowel Preparation for Colonoscopy].
Korean J Gastroenterol. 2022 Sep 25;80(3):154-157. doi: 10.4166/kjg.2022.054.

引用本文的文献

1
Efficacy, tolerability, and safety of oral sulfate tablet versus 2 L-polyethylene glycol/ascorbate for bowel preparation in older patients: prospective, multicenter, investigator single-blinded, randomized study.口服硫酸盐片与 2 L 聚乙二醇/抗坏血酸在老年患者肠道准备中的疗效、耐受性和安全性:前瞻性、多中心、研究者单盲、随机研究。
J Gastroenterol. 2024 May;59(5):402-410. doi: 10.1007/s00535-024-02089-9. Epub 2024 Mar 16.
2
Strategies to improve screening colonoscopy quality for the prevention of colorectal cancer.提高结直肠癌预防筛查结肠镜检查质量的策略。
Korean J Intern Med. 2024 Jul;39(4):547-554. doi: 10.3904/kjim.2023.334. Epub 2024 Jan 22.

本文引用的文献

1
Efficacy of oral sulfate tablets for bowel preparation and adenoma detection rate.口服硫酸片剂用于肠道准备及腺瘤检出率的疗效
J Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2023 Mar;38(3):410-415. doi: 10.1111/jgh.16079. Epub 2022 Dec 12.
2
Comparison of the efficacy and safety between oral sulfate tablet and polyethylene glycol for bowel preparation before colonoscopy according to age.根据年龄比较口服硫酸盐片和聚乙二醇用于结肠镜检查前肠道准备的疗效和安全性。
Medicine (Baltimore). 2022 Jul 8;101(27):e29884. doi: 10.1097/MD.0000000000029884.
3
Taking Oral Sulfate Tablets with Simethicone for Bowel Preparation Leads to Higher Adenoma Detection Rate than Polyethylene Glycol: A Propensity Score Analysis.
服用含西甲硅油的口服硫酸盐片进行肠道准备比服用聚乙二醇导致更高的腺瘤检出率:一项倾向评分分析。
Dig Dis Sci. 2023 Mar;68(3):867-876. doi: 10.1007/s10620-022-07611-8. Epub 2022 Jul 4.
4
A Safety and Efficacy Comparison of a New Sulfate-Based Tablet Bowel Preparation Versus a PEG and Ascorbate Comparator in Adult Subjects Undergoing Colonoscopy.一种新型硫酸盐片剂肠道准备与 PEG 和抗坏血酸盐对照剂在接受结肠镜检查的成年受试者中的安全性和疗效比较。
Am J Gastroenterol. 2021 Feb 1;116(2):319-328. doi: 10.14309/ajg.0000000000001020.
5
Predictors and colonoscopy outcomes of inadequate bowel cleansing: a 10-year experience in 28,725 patients.肠道准备不充分的预测因素及结肠镜检查结果:28725例患者的10年经验
Ann Gastroenterol. 2019 Sep-Oct;32(5):457-462. doi: 10.20524/aog.2019.0400. Epub 2019 Jul 6.
6
Novel sulfate tablet PBK-1701TC versus oral sulfate solution for colon cleansing: A randomized phase 3 trial.新型硫酸盐片剂 PBK-1701TC 与口服硫酸盐溶液用于结肠清洁:一项随机 3 期试验。
J Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2020 Jan;35(1):29-36. doi: 10.1111/jgh.14826. Epub 2019 Oct 7.
7
Bowel preparation for colonoscopy: European Society of Gastrointestinal Endoscopy (ESGE) Guideline - Update 2019.结肠镜检查的肠道准备:欧洲胃肠道内镜学会(ESGE)指南 - 更新 2019 年。
Endoscopy. 2019 Aug;51(8):775-794. doi: 10.1055/a-0959-0505. Epub 2019 Jul 11.
8
Colon cleansing efficacy and safety with 1 L NER1006 versus 2 L polyethylene glycol + ascorbate: a randomized phase 3 trial.1 L NER1006 与 2 L 聚乙二醇+抗坏血酸相比的结肠清洁效果和安全性:一项随机 3 期试验。
Endoscopy. 2019 Jan;51(1):60-72. doi: 10.1055/a-0638-8125. Epub 2018 Jul 19.
9
A Comparative Study of Treatment-Emergent Adverse Events Following Use of Common Bowel Preparations Among a Colonoscopy Screening Population: Results from a Post-Marketing Observational Study.结肠镜筛查人群中使用常见肠道准备药物后治疗中出现的不良事件的比较研究:一项上市后观察性研究的结果
Dig Dis Sci. 2016 Oct;61(10):2993-3006. doi: 10.1007/s10620-016-4214-2. Epub 2016 Jun 9.
10
Validation of a Patient Satisfaction Scale in Patients Undergoing Bowel Preparation Prior to Colonoscopy.结肠镜检查前肠道准备患者的患者满意度量表验证
Patient. 2016 Feb;9(1):27-34. doi: 10.1007/s40271-015-0154-8.