• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

结肠镜检查前准备时间更短可提高肠道清洁质量。

Shorter preparation to procedure interval for colonoscopy improves quality of bowel cleansing.

机构信息

Department of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Royal Adelaide Hospital, Adelaide, South Australia, Australia.

出版信息

Intern Med J. 2013 Feb;43(2):162-8. doi: 10.1111/j.1445-5994.2012.02963.x.

DOI:10.1111/j.1445-5994.2012.02963.x
PMID:22998352
Abstract

BACKGROUND

The timing of bowel preparation for colonoscopy influences the quality of bowel cleansing and the success of the procedure.

AIM

We aimed to determine whether the interval between the end of bowel preparation and the start of colonoscopy influences preparation quality.

METHODS

We retrospectively analysed 1785 colonoscopies performed between January 2010 and January 2011. The quality of bowel cleansing was compared between those who had a less than 8-h interval between the end of bowel preparation to the start of the procedure versus those who had a greater than 8-h interval. Univariate and multivariate logistic regression analyses evaluated quality of bowel cleansing, preparation to procedure time, age, gender, hospital inpatient or outpatient status, indication for colonoscopy, caecal intubation rate, and segmental polyp detection.

RESULTS

Fifty-three per cent of the cohort was male. Eighty-nine per cent were outpatients. Bowel cleansing was reported as satisfactory/good in 87% and poor in 13%. A <8-h preparation to procedure time was associated with a higher rate of satisfactory/good cleansing than a >8-h interval (odds ratio (OR) 1.3, P = 0.04). In a multivariate analysis, female gender (OR 1.4, P = 0.02), outpatient status (OR 3.1 P = 0.001) and indication for procedure (P < 0.01) were significant predictors of adequate bowel preparation. Adequate bowel preparation was associated with a significant increase in caecal intubation rates (OR 5.3, P = 0.001).

CONCLUSIONS

A shorter (<8 h) interval between end of bowel preparation and start of colonoscopy yielded better bowel cleansing than a longer (>8 h) interval. Adequate bowel preparation led to improved caecal intubation rates.

摘要

背景

结肠镜检查前的肠道准备时间会影响肠道清洁质量和操作的成功率。

目的

我们旨在确定肠道准备结束到结肠镜检查开始之间的间隔是否会影响准备质量。

方法

我们回顾性分析了 2010 年 1 月至 2011 年 1 月期间进行的 1785 例结肠镜检查。比较了肠道准备结束到操作开始之间间隔小于 8 小时与间隔大于 8 小时的患者肠道清洁质量。采用单因素和多因素逻辑回归分析评估肠道清洁质量、准备与操作时间、年龄、性别、医院门诊或住院状态、结肠镜检查指征、盲肠插管率和节段性息肉检出率。

结果

队列中有 53%的患者为男性。89%为门诊患者。87%的患者报告肠道清洁效果满意/良好,13%的患者报告效果差。与大于 8 小时的间隔相比,小于 8 小时的准备与操作时间间隔与更满意/良好的清洁效果相关(比值比(OR)1.3,P = 0.04)。在多因素分析中,女性(OR 1.4,P = 0.02)、门诊状态(OR 3.1,P = 0.001)和操作指征(P < 0.01)是充分肠道准备的显著预测因素。充分的肠道准备与盲肠插管率的显著增加相关(OR 5.3,P = 0.001)。

结论

与较长(>8 小时)的间隔相比,肠道准备结束到结肠镜检查开始之间的较短(<8 小时)间隔可获得更好的肠道清洁效果。充分的肠道准备可提高盲肠插管率。

相似文献

1
Shorter preparation to procedure interval for colonoscopy improves quality of bowel cleansing.结肠镜检查前准备时间更短可提高肠道清洁质量。
Intern Med J. 2013 Feb;43(2):162-8. doi: 10.1111/j.1445-5994.2012.02963.x.
2
Impact of patient education on quality of bowel preparation in outpatient colonoscopies.患者教育对门诊结肠镜检查肠道准备质量的影响。
Qual Prim Care. 2009;17(6):397-404.
3
Optimal preparation-to-colonoscopy interval in split-dose PEG bowel preparation determines satisfactory bowel preparation quality: an observational prospective study.分剂量 PEG 肠道准备中最佳准备-结肠镜检查间隔时间决定满意的肠道准备质量:一项观察性前瞻性研究。
Gastrointest Endosc. 2012 Mar;75(3):583-90. doi: 10.1016/j.gie.2011.09.029. Epub 2011 Dec 15.
4
Duration of the interval between the completion of bowel preparation and the start of colonoscopy predicts bowel-preparation quality.肠道准备完成至结肠镜检查开始之间的间隔时间可预测肠道准备质量。
Gastrointest Endosc. 2009 Mar;69(3 Pt 2):700-6. doi: 10.1016/j.gie.2008.09.047.
5
A prospective audit of the efficacy, safety, and acceptability of low-volume polyethylene glycol (2 L) versus standard volume polyethylene glycol (4 L) versus magnesium citrate plus stimulant laxative as bowel preparation for colonoscopy.前瞻性研究低容量聚乙二醇(2L)与标准容量聚乙二醇(4L)、枸橼酸镁联合刺激性泻药在结肠镜检查前肠道准备中的疗效、安全性和可接受性。
J Clin Gastroenterol. 2012 Aug;46(7):595-601. doi: 10.1097/MCG.0b013e3182432162.
6
Quality of bowel cleansing for afternoon colonoscopy is influenced by time of administration.下午行结肠镜检查时,肠道准备的清洁质量受给药时间的影响。
Am J Gastroenterol. 2010 Nov;105(11):2318-22. doi: 10.1038/ajg.2010.235.
7
Quality indicators for colonoscopy in a Tunisian endoscopy unit.突尼斯一家内镜检查单位的结肠镜检查质量指标
Tunis Med. 2015 Mar;93(3):138-41.
8
High-dose senna compared with conventional PEG-ES lavage as bowel preparation for elective colonoscopy: a prospective, randomized, investigator-blinded trial.大剂量番泻叶与传统聚乙二醇电解质溶液灌洗用于择期结肠镜检查肠道准备的比较:一项前瞻性、随机、研究者设盲试验
Am J Gastroenterol. 2005 Dec;100(12):2674-80. doi: 10.1111/j.1572-0241.2005.00335.x.
9
Usefulness of an intensive bowel cleansing strategy for repeat colonoscopy after preparation failure.强化肠道清洁策略在结肠镜检查失败后的重复应用。
Dis Colon Rectum. 2011 Dec;54(12):1578-84. doi: 10.1097/DCR.0b013e31823434c8.
10
Different bowel preparation schedule leads to different diagnostic yield of proximal and nonpolypoid colorectal neoplasm at screening colonoscopy in average-risk population.不同的肠道准备方案在平均风险人群的筛查结肠镜检查中导致近端和非息肉样结直肠肿瘤的诊断率不同。
Dis Colon Rectum. 2011 Dec;54(12):1570-7. doi: 10.1097/DCR.0b013e318231d667.

引用本文的文献

1
Quality of colonoscopy performed by medical or surgical specialists and trainees in five Australian hospitals.澳大利亚五家医院内科或外科专家及实习生进行结肠镜检查的质量
World J Gastrointest Endosc. 2022 Nov 16;14(11):672-683. doi: 10.4253/wjge.v14.i11.672.
2
Efficacy and Patient Tolerability of Split-Dose Sodium Picosulfate/Magnesium Citrate (SPMC) Oral Solution Compared to the Polyethylene Glycol (PEG) Solution for Bowel Preparation in Outpatient Colonoscopy: An Evidence-Based Review.与聚乙二醇(PEG)溶液相比,分剂量服用的比沙可啶钠/柠檬酸镁(SPMC)口服溶液用于门诊结肠镜检查肠道准备的疗效及患者耐受性:一项循证综述
Clin Exp Gastroenterol. 2020 Oct 7;13:449-457. doi: 10.2147/CEG.S237649. eCollection 2020.
3
Bowel preparation quality between hospitalized patients and outpatient colonoscopies.
住院患者与门诊结肠镜检查患者的肠道准备质量。
Saudi J Gastroenterol. 2018 Mar-Apr;24(2):93-99. doi: 10.4103/sjg.SJG_485_17.
4
Bedside endoscopy of patients with gastrointestinal bleeding: early does not mean hurried.胃肠道出血患者的床边内镜检查:早并不意味着仓促。
Korean J Intern Med. 2018 Mar;33(2):290-292. doi: 10.3904/kjim.2018.045. Epub 2018 Feb 27.
5
Improving the Quality of Inpatient Bowel Preparation for Colonoscopies.提高结肠镜检查的住院患者肠道准备质量。
Dig Dis Sci. 2018 Feb;63(2):338-344. doi: 10.1007/s10620-017-4896-0. Epub 2018 Jan 4.
6
Comparison of claims data on hospitalization rates and repeat procedures in patients receiving a bowel preparation prior to colonoscopy.接受结肠镜检查前肠道准备的患者住院率和重复手术的索赔数据比较。
SAGE Open Med. 2017 Aug 31;5:2050312117727999. doi: 10.1177/2050312117727999. eCollection 2017.
7
Systematic Review: Outcomes by Duration of NPO Status prior to Colonoscopy.系统评价:结肠镜检查前非禁食状态持续时间的结局
Gastroenterol Res Pract. 2017;2017:3914942. doi: 10.1155/2017/3914942. Epub 2017 Jul 16.
8
Meta-Analysis of the Effect of Bowel Preparation on Adenoma Detection: Early Adenomas Affected Stronger than Advanced Adenomas.肠道准备对腺瘤检测效果的Meta分析:早期腺瘤比进展期腺瘤受影响更强。
PLoS One. 2016 Jun 3;11(6):e0154149. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0154149. eCollection 2016.
9
Optimizing bowel preparation for colonoscopy: a guide to enhance quality of visualization.优化结肠镜检查的肠道准备:提高可视化质量指南
Ann Gastroenterol. 2016 Apr-Jun;29(2):137-46. doi: 10.20524/aog.2016.0005.
10
What Is the Optimal Timing of Bowel Preparation for Video Capsule Endoscopy?视频胶囊内镜检查肠道准备的最佳时机是什么?
Clin Endosc. 2015 May;48(3):183-4. doi: 10.5946/ce.2015.48.3.183. Epub 2015 May 29.