Gómez Berrocal María Del Carmen, Vallejo-Medina Pablo, Moyano Nieves, Sierra Juan Carlos
Mind, Brain, and Behavior Research Center (CIMCYC), University of Granada, Granada, Spain.
SexLab KL, Fundación Universitaria Konrad Lorenz, Bogotá, Colombia.
Front Psychol. 2019 Aug 14;10:1869. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2019.01869. eCollection 2019.
In the context of heterosexual relationships, the sexual double standard (SDS) leads to a more negative assessment of women than men when they exhibit the same sexual behavior. This work assumes that in Western democratic societies, the individual attitude toward SDS takes different forms due to the processes of conviction regarding the social norm that exists on this matter. Therefore, the individual attitude toward SDS will depend on the person's perception of what others think about that topic. We distinguish between self-referred response, it refers to subjects' personal endorsement of the SDS, and responses hetero-referred, subjects' perception of sexual societal double standard. This paper presents a version of the Double Standard Scale (SDSS) that assesses the subjective perception of society's support for the SDS. We examine its psychometric properties in a sample of Spanish population heterosexual of 1,206 individuals (50% males), distributed across three groups (18-34, 35-49, and 50 years old or older). We performed Exploratory and Confirmatory Factor Analysis. The final version consists of 18 item distributed into three factors (Acceptance for Male Sexual Shyness, Acceptance for Female Sexual Freedom and Acceptance for Traditional Double Standard). Said three-factor structure does not match with the two-factor structure of the self-referred form. Internal consistency, temporal stability and validity evidence are reported. This version of the SDSS is reliable and valid. No gender differences are found in the SDSS-H. However, the results show that the context of group membership, based on education and age, is differently associated with the response to SDSS-H. That is, higher scores are found for individuals with the highest education and for the youngest participants. We discuss the usefulness of this measure to improve the prediction of individual attitude toward SDS, as well as, to evaluate the SDS phenomenon at a level of macropsychological analysis.
在异性恋关系中,性双重标准(SDS)导致女性在表现出与男性相同的性行为时,比男性受到更负面的评价。这项研究假设,在西方民主社会中,由于对这一问题上存在的社会规范的认同过程,个人对SDS的态度呈现出不同的形式。因此,个人对SDS的态度将取决于其对他人对此话题看法的认知。我们区分了自我指向性反应(即个体对SDS的个人认同)和他人指向性反应(即个体对性社会双重标准的认知)。本文介绍了一种双重标准量表(SDSS),用于评估社会对SDS支持的主观认知。我们在1206名西班牙异性恋人群样本(50%为男性)中检验了其心理测量特性,这些样本分为三组(18 - 34岁、35 - 49岁和50岁及以上)。我们进行了探索性和验证性因素分析。最终版本由18个项目组成,分为三个因素(对男性性羞涩的接受度、对女性性自由的接受度和对传统双重标准的接受度)。上述三因素结构与自我指向形式的两因素结构不匹配。报告了内部一致性、时间稳定性和效度证据。这个版本的SDSS是可靠且有效的。在SDSS - H中未发现性别差异。然而,结果表明,基于教育程度和年龄的群体成员背景与对SDSS - H的反应存在不同关联。也就是说,教育程度最高的个体和最年轻的参与者得分更高。我们讨论了该测量方法在改善对个体对SDS态度预测方面的有用性,以及在宏观心理分析层面评估SDS现象的作用。