Trienes R
Acta Biotheor. 1988;37(2):91-119. doi: 10.1007/BF00115899.
Notwithstanding the general rise of experimental disciplines in biology in the first decades of our century, in Germany and in the Netherlands the interest in the idealistic morphological tradition flourished, and compensated for a reductionistic causal approach to natural phenomena. This article analyses the influence of the German idealistic morphologists W. Lubosch and A. Meyer on the development of C.J. van der Klaauw's epistemology. It discusses the gradual incorporation of non-causal principles into van der Klaauw's concept of biology. Van der Klaauw's epistemological concept of holistic biology was shaped in a critical confrontation with German idealistic morphology, and his early considerations can be interpreted as a direct impulse towards the development of his theory of functional components. Van der Klaauw's theories, being an alternative to the reductionistic experimental sciences, were among the causes of the fact that in the first half of our century biology in the Netherlands took a course deviating from the development of biology in the Anglo-American countries.
尽管在本世纪的头几十年里,生物学领域的实验学科普遍兴起,但在德国和荷兰,对唯心主义形态学传统的兴趣依然蓬勃发展,并弥补了对自然现象采用还原论因果方法的不足。本文分析了德国唯心主义形态学家W. 卢博施和A. 迈耶对C.J. 范德克拉乌认识论发展的影响。它讨论了非因果原则是如何逐渐融入范德克拉乌的生物学概念中的。范德克拉乌的整体生物学认识论概念是在与德国唯心主义形态学的批判性对抗中形成的,他早期的思考可以被解释为对其功能成分理论发展的直接推动。范德克拉乌的理论是还原论实验科学的一种替代,这也是本世纪上半叶荷兰生物学走上与英美国家生物学发展不同道路的原因之一。