Physiotherapist, London Health Sciences Centre , London, Canada.
Physiotherapist, Advance Sports and Spine Physical Therapy , Portland, OR, USA.
J Man Manip Ther. 2020 Sep;28(4):222-230. doi: 10.1080/10669817.2019.1661706. Epub 2019 Sep 2.
To investigate the proportion of patients that present with isolated extremity pain who have a spinal source of symptoms and evaluate the response to spinal intervention.
Participants (n = 369) presenting with isolated extremity pain and who believed that their pain was not originating from their spine, were assessed using a Mechanical Diagnosis and Therapy differentiation process. Numerical Pain Rating Scale, Upper Extremity/Lower Extremity Functional Index and the Orebro Questionnaire were collected at the initial visit and at discharge. Global Rating of Change outcomes were collected at discharge. Clinicians provided MDT 'treatment as usual'. A chi-square test examined the overall significance of the comparison within each region. Effect sizes between spinal and extremity source groups were calculated for the outcome scores at discharge.
Overall, 43.5% of participants had a spinal source of symptoms. Effect sizes indicated that the spinal source group had improved outcomes at discharge for all outcomes compared to the extremity source group.
Over 40% of patients with isolated extremity pain, who believed that their pain was not originating from the spine, responded to spinal intervention and thus were classified as having a spinal source of symptoms. These patients did significantly better than those whose extremity pain did not have a spinal source and were managed with local extremity interventions. The results suggest the spine is a common source of extremity pain and adequate screening is warranted to ensure the patients ́ source of symptoms is addressed.
调查以孤立肢体疼痛就诊且症状有脊柱来源的患者比例,并评估脊柱介入治疗的反应。
采用机械诊断与治疗(MDT)鉴别过程,评估以孤立肢体疼痛就诊且认为疼痛并非源于脊柱的参与者(n=369)。在初次就诊和出院时采集数字疼痛评分量表、上肢/下肢功能指数和 Orebro 问卷。在出院时采集总体变化的全球评定量表结果。临床医生提供 MDT“常规治疗”。卡方检验检验每个区域内的比较的整体显著性。对出院时的结局评分,计算脊柱和肢体来源组之间的效应量。
总体而言,43.5%的参与者有脊柱症状来源。效应量表明,与肢体来源组相比,脊柱来源组在出院时所有结局的改善情况均更好。
超过 40%的以孤立肢体疼痛就诊且认为疼痛并非源于脊柱的患者对脊柱介入治疗有反应,因此被归类为有脊柱症状来源。这些患者的改善情况明显优于那些肢体疼痛没有脊柱来源且接受局部肢体干预的患者。结果表明,脊柱是肢体疼痛的常见来源,需要进行充分的筛查,以确保患者的症状来源得到解决。