Suppr超能文献

经皮超声引导下射频和微波消融治疗肝转移瘤:单中心初步经验

Percutaneous ultrasound guided radiofrequency and microwave ablation in the treatment of hepatic metastases. A monocentric initial experience.

作者信息

Sparchez Zeno, Mocan Tudor, Hajjar Nadim All, Bartos Adrian, Hagiu Claudia, Matei Daniela, Craciun Rares, Mocan Lavinia Patricia, Sparchez Mihaela, Leucuta Daniel Corneliu

机构信息

3rd Medical Department, "Iuliu Hatieganu" University of Medicine and Pharmacy Cluj-Napoca, Romania Institute for Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Cluj-Napoca, Romania.

1) Institute for Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Cluj-Napoca, Romania 2) 3rd Surgical Department, "Iuliu Hatieganu" University of Medicine and Pharmacy Cluj-Napoca, Romania.

出版信息

Med Ultrason. 2019 Aug 31;21(3):217-224. doi: 10.11152/mu-1957.

Abstract

AIM

Percutaneous radiofrequency (RFA) and microwave ablation (MWA) are currently the best treatment options forpatients with liver metastases (LM) who cannot undergo a liver resection procedure. Presently, few studies have evaluated theefficacy of tumor ablation in beginner's hands but none at all in hepatic metastasis. Our aim was to report the initial experiencewith ultrasound as a tool to guide tumor ablation in a low volume center with no experience in tumor ablation.

MATERIAL AND METHODS

We conducted a retrospective cohort study, on a series of 61 patients who had undergone percutaneous US-guided ablations for 82 LM between 2010 and 2015. Long term outcome predictors were assessed using univariate and multivariate analysis.

RESULTS

Complete ablation was achieved in 86.9% of cases (53/61). All MWA sessions (20/20) attained ablation margins >5mm, compared to 79% (49/62) for RFA sessions (p=0.031). Ablation time was significantly shorter for MWA, with a median duration of 10 minutes (range: 6-12) vs. 14 minutes (range: 10-19.5, p=0.003). There was no statistically significant difference in local tumor progression (LTP)-free survival rates between MWA and RFA (p=0.154). On univariate analysis, significant predictors for local recurrence were multiple metastases (p=0.013) and ablation margins <5 mm (p<.001), both retaining significance on multivariate analysis. Significant predictors for distant recurrence on both univariate and multivariate analysis were multiple metastases (p<0.001) and non-colorectal cancer metastases (p<0.05).

CONCLUSION

A larger than 5 mm ablation size is critical for local tumor control. We favor the use of MWA due to its ability to achieve ablation in significantlyshorter times with less incomplete ablations.

摘要

目的

经皮射频消融(RFA)和微波消融(MWA)是目前无法进行肝切除手术的肝转移瘤(LM)患者的最佳治疗选择。目前,很少有研究评估初学者进行肿瘤消融的疗效,而对于肝转移瘤的此类研究则完全没有。我们的目的是报告在一个没有肿瘤消融经验的小容量中心,将超声作为引导肿瘤消融工具的初步经验。

材料与方法

我们进行了一项回顾性队列研究,研究对象为2010年至2015年间接受经皮超声引导下消融治疗82个肝转移瘤的61例患者。使用单因素和多因素分析评估长期预后预测因素。

结果

86.9%(53/61)的病例实现了完全消融。所有微波消融治疗(20/20)的消融边缘均>5mm,相比之下,射频消融治疗的这一比例为79%(49/62)(p=0.031)。微波消融的消融时间明显更短,中位持续时间为10分钟(范围:6-12分钟),而射频消融的中位持续时间为14分钟(范围:10-19.5分钟,p=0.003)。微波消融和射频消融的无局部肿瘤进展(LTP)生存率之间无统计学显著差异(p=0.154)。单因素分析显示,局部复发的显著预测因素为多发转移(p=0.013)和消融边缘<5mm(p<0.001),两者在多因素分析中均保持显著性。单因素和多因素分析中远处复发的显著预测因素均为多发转移(p<0.001)和非结直肠癌转移(p<0.05)。

结论

大于5mm的消融范围对于局部肿瘤控制至关重要。由于微波消融能够在更短时间内实现消融且不完全消融较少,我们倾向于使用微波消融。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验