University of California, Berkeley, United States.
The World Bank, United States.
Soc Sci Med. 2019 Oct;238:112462. doi: 10.1016/j.socscimed.2019.112462. Epub 2019 Aug 1.
We apply mixed methods to explore how a conditional cash transfer (CCT) may influence intimate partner violence (IPV). Qualitative interviews with female beneficiaries of Bolsa Familia, Brazil's CCT program, and service providers suggest positive, negative, and null associations between CCTs and IPV are all plausible. These associations result from a combination of economic and psychological motivations. We also use quantitative methods to examine if the expansion of Bolsa Familia between 2004 and 2009 affects the female homicide rate and marital separations. Using municipal level data in a difference-in-differences analysis, we find null associations between Bolsa Familia and female homicides. When we examine the impact on marriages and separations, indicative of a change in the reservation utility of women within the household, we find no impact on marriages but Bolsa Familia is associated with an increase in separations, and, to a greater extent, separations of couples with children. These results suggest Bolsa Familia impacts women's agency within the family, but not to the extent that it reduces the most extreme form of IPV.
我们运用混合方法来探讨有条件现金转移支付(CCT)如何影响亲密伴侣暴力(IPV)。对巴西“家庭补助金”计划的女性受益人和服务提供者的定性访谈表明,CCT 与 IPV 之间存在积极、消极和中性的关联,这些关联源于经济和心理动机的结合。我们还使用定量方法来检验“家庭补助金”计划在 2004 年至 2009 年间的扩大是否会影响女性的凶杀率和婚姻分居率。利用差分分析中的市级数据,我们发现“家庭补助金”计划与女性凶杀案之间没有关联。当我们检验对婚姻和分居的影响,即家庭内部妇女保留效用的变化时,我们发现婚姻没有受到影响,但“家庭补助金”计划与分居增加有关,而且,在更大程度上,与有子女的夫妇分居有关。这些结果表明,“家庭补助金”计划影响了妇女在家庭中的代理权,但没有达到减少最极端形式的 IPV 的程度。