Department of Psychology, University of North Dakota, Grand Forks, ND, USA.
Appl Neuropsychol Child. 2021 Apr;10(2):165-170. doi: 10.1080/21622965.2019.1654385. Epub 2019 Sep 2.
College students ( = 120) answered 18 yes-no questions that varied the child's gender (male, female), grade (grade school, high school, college), and sport (football, soccer, hockey). The format of the 18 yes or no questions was "If you had a child in (grade school, high school, college) would you let (him, her) play (football, soccer, hockey)"? Similar to a previous study, a large percentage (78.8%) of the respondents answered yes to the questions about football, indicating that they would permit their children to play football despite the risk of concussion (96% yes for male children, 67% yes for female children). Although the number of respondents who would allow their male child to play soccer (98% for male children, 99% for female children) or hockey (92% for male children, 89% for female children) was similar to the percentage of respondents that would allow their male child to play football, significantly more respondents would allow their female child to play soccer or hockey than football. This result is potentially problematic because soccer and hockey have high rates of concussion, especially for females, which suggests that the respondents may have been unaware of this fact.
大学生（=120）回答了 18 个是非题，这些题目涉及孩子的性别（男性、女性）、年级（小学、中学、大学）和运动（足球、足球、曲棍球）。这 18 个是非题的格式是“如果你有一个孩子在（小学、中学、大学），你会让（他、她）玩（足球、足球、曲棍球）吗？”与之前的一项研究类似，很大比例（78.8%）的受访者对足球问题回答了“是”，这表明他们允许自己的孩子踢足球，尽管有脑震荡的风险（96%的男童，67%的女童）。尽管允许自己的男童踢足球的受访者比例与允许自己的男童踢足球的受访者比例相似（98%的男童，99%的女童），但允许自己的男童踢足球的受访者比例与允许自己的男童踢足球的受访者比例相似（92%的男童，89%的女童），但允许自己的女童踢足球或曲棍球的受访者比例明显高于足球。这一结果可能存在问题，因为足球和曲棍球的脑震荡率很高，尤其是女性，这表明受访者可能没有意识到这一事实。
