Suppr超能文献

生理盐水扳机点注射与常规活性药物混合治疗肌筋膜疼痛综合征。

Normal Saline Trigger Point Injections vs Conventional Active Drug Mix for Myofascial Pain Syndromes.

机构信息

Department of Pain Medicine, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, USA; McGovern Medical School at the University of Texas Health Science Center at Houston (UTHealth), Houston, TX, USA.

Department of Pain Medicine, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, USA.

出版信息

Am J Emerg Med. 2020 Feb;38(2):311-316. doi: 10.1016/j.ajem.2019.158410. Epub 2019 Aug 24.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

Myofascial pain syndrome (MPS) originates in the muscle and fascia. MPS presents with referred pain specific for each muscle and a trigger point that reproduces the symptoms. Trigger-point-injection (TPI) is an effective approach to treating MPS. Some TPI agents, however, are associated with systemic and local side effects.

OBJECTIVE

The aim of this study was to evaluate the effectiveness of TPI with a conventional active drug mixture (CADM) vs. that with normal saline solution (NS) alone in patients with MPS presenting to the emergency department (ED).

METHODS

Adults with MPS diagnosed in the ED, participants were randomly assigned to receive TPI with NS or with CADM. Pain intensity was scored using a 0-10 numeric rating scale prior to and after TPI, before discharge and 2 weeks after TPI.

RESULTS

Among 48 patients analyzed, 23 received TPI with NS. The mean pain scores were as follows: immediately before TPI, 7.59 (NS) and 7.44 (CADM); immediately after TPI, 2.22 (NS) and 1.76 (CADM); prior to discharge, 1.52 (NS) and 1.76 (CADM). At 2-week follow up, the mean pain scores were 4.29 (NS) and 4.14 (CADM). Pain was significantly reduced after TPI in both groups. At 2 weeks, the mean pain scores were similar between the groups. No adverse events were reported.

CONCLUSION

In cases of MPS in the ED, pain can be controlled with TPI independent of the injectate. TPI with NS may be preferred over CADM because of its lower cost and more favorable side effect profile.

摘要

背景

肌筋膜疼痛综合征(MPS)源于肌肉和筋膜。MPS 表现为特定于每块肌肉的牵涉痛和可再现症状的触发点。触发点注射(TPI)是治疗 MPS 的有效方法。然而,一些 TPI 药物与全身和局部副作用有关。

目的

本研究旨在评估 TPI 联合常规活性药物混合物(CADM)与单独使用生理盐水(NS)治疗急诊(ED)就诊的 MPS 患者的疗效。

方法

ED 诊断为 MPS 的成年人,随机分配接受 NS 或 CADM 的 TPI。TPI 前后、出院前和 TPI 后 2 周使用 0-10 数字评分量表评估疼痛强度。

结果

在分析的 48 名患者中,有 23 名接受了 NS 的 TPI。平均疼痛评分如下:TPI 前,7.59(NS)和 7.44(CADM);TPI 后即刻,2.22(NS)和 1.76(CADM);出院前,1.52(NS)和 1.76(CADM)。在 2 周随访时,平均疼痛评分分别为 4.29(NS)和 4.14(CADM)。两组 TPI 后疼痛均明显减轻。在 2 周时,两组之间的平均疼痛评分相似。未报告不良事件。

结论

在 ED 中的 MPS 情况下,TPI 可以独立于注射剂来控制疼痛。由于 NS 的成本更低且副作用谱更有利,因此与 CADM 相比,NS 的 TPI 可能更受青睐。

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验