Eapen Mary, Brazauskas Ruta, Walters Mark C, Bernaudin Françoise, Bo-Subait Khalid, Fitzhugh Courtney D, Hankins Jane S, Kanter Julie, Meerpohl Joerg J, Bolaños-Meade Javier, Panepinto Julie A, Rondelli Damiano, Shenoy Shalini, Williamson Joi, Woolford Teonna L, Gluckman Eliane, Wagner John E, Tisdale John F
Center for International Blood and Marrow Transplant Research, Department of Medicine, Medical College of Wisconsin, Milwaukee, WI, USA.
Division of Biostatistics, Institute for Health and Society, Medical College of Wisconsin, Milwaukee, WI, USA.
Lancet Haematol. 2019 Nov;6(11):e585-e596. doi: 10.1016/S2352-3026(19)30154-1. Epub 2019 Sep 5.
Donors other than matched siblings and low-intensity conditioning regimens are increasingly used in haematopoietic stem cell transplantation. We aimed to compare the relative risk of donor type and conditioning regimen intensity on the transplantation outcomes of in patients with sickle cell disease.
For this retrospective cohort study, we collected data from 90 US centres reported to the Center for International Blood and Marrow Transplant Research. Eligible patients were younger than 50 years, had genetically confirmed sickle cell disease (Hb SS) or sickle beta thalassemia (Hb Sβ), and underwent allogeneic haematopoietic cell transplantation between Jan 15, 2008, and Dec 28, 2017. We considered transplants from donor-recipient pairs matched at the allele-level (HLA-A, HLA-B, HLA-C, and HLA-DRB1), including HLA-matched sibling donors, haploidentical related donors, matched unrelated donors, or mismatched unrelated donors. The main outcome was event-free survival. The effect of donor type, conditioning regimen intensity (myeloablative, non-myeloablative, and reduced-intensity regimens), age (≤12 or 13-49 years), sex, performance score, comorbidity index, recipient cytomegalovirus serostatus, graft type (bone marrow, peripheral blood, or umbilical cord blood), and transplantation period (2008-12 and 2013-17) on outcomes was studied using Cox regression models.
Of 996 patients with sickle cell disease and who underwent transplantation in 2008-17, 910 (91%) were included (558 [61%] patients had HLA-matched sibling donors, 137 [15%] haploidentical related donors, 111 [12%] matched unrelated donors, and 104 [11%] mismatched unrelated donors). The median follow-up was 36 months (IQR 18-60) after transplantation from HLA-matched siblings, 25 months (12-48) after transplantation from haploidentical related donors, 37 months (23-60) after transplantation from HLA-matched unrelated donors, and 47 months (24-72) after transplantation from mismatched unrelated donors. Event-free survival was worse in recipients aged 13 years or older than in those younger than 13 years (hazard ratio 1·74, 95% CI 1·24-2·45; p=0·0014) and in those who received a transplant from haploidentical related donors (5·30, 3·17-8·86; p<0·0001), matched unrelated donors (3·71, 2·39-5·75; p<0·0001), and mismatched unrelated donors (4·34, 2·58-7·32; p<0·0001) than in patients who received a transplant from matched siblings. There was no significant difference in event-free survival between recipients of transplants from non-sibling donors: haploidentical related donors (1·43, 0·81-2·50; p=0·21) or mismatched unrelated donors (1·17, 0·67-2·05; p=0·58) versus HLA-matched unrelated donors, or mismatched unrelated donors versus haploidentical related donors (1·22, 0·65-2·27; p=0·98). Event-free survival was also worse in patients conditioned with reduced-intensity regimens (1·97, 1·15-3·36; p=0·013) than in those conditioned with non-myeloablative regimens, but did not differ between those who received myeloablative compared with non-myeloablative regimens (1·57, 0·95-2·61; p=0·079). Interpretation Our data suggest that event-free survival is improved in patients with sickle cell disease who receive an allogenic transplantation at age 12 years or younger and those with an HLA-matched sibling donor. For patients without a matched sibling available for transplantation, our data do not favour one alternative donor type over another in this setting.
National Institutes of Health and US Health Services Research Administration, Department of Health and Human Services.
除匹配的同胞供者外,其他供者以及低强度预处理方案在造血干细胞移植中的应用越来越广泛。我们旨在比较供者类型和预处理方案强度对镰状细胞病患者移植结局的相对风险。
在这项回顾性队列研究中,我们收集了向国际血液和骨髓移植研究中心报告的90家美国中心的数据。符合条件的患者年龄小于50岁,经基因确诊为镰状细胞病(Hb SS)或镰状β地中海贫血(Hb Sβ),并在2008年1月15日至2017年12月28日期间接受了异基因造血细胞移植。我们考虑了来自等位基因水平匹配的供受者对(HLA - A、HLA - B、HLA - C和HLA - DRB1)的移植,包括HLA匹配的同胞供者、单倍体相合相关供者、匹配的无关供者或不匹配的无关供者。主要结局是无事件生存期。使用Cox回归模型研究供者类型、预处理方案强度(清髓性、非清髓性和减低强度方案)、年龄(≤12岁或13 - 49岁)、性别、体能状态评分、合并症指数、受者巨细胞病毒血清学状态、移植物类型(骨髓、外周血或脐带血)以及移植时期(2008 - 12年和2013 - 17年)对结局的影响。
在2008 - 17年接受移植的996例镰状细胞病患者中,910例(91%)被纳入研究(558例[61%]患者有HLA匹配的同胞供者,137例[15%]单倍体相合相关供者,111例[12%]匹配的无关供者,104例[11%]不匹配的无关供者)。从HLA匹配的同胞供者移植后中位随访时间为36个月(IQR 18 - 60),从单倍体相合相关供者移植后为25个月(12 - 48),从HLA匹配的无关供者移植后为37个月(23 - 60),从不匹配的无关供者移植后为47个月(24 - 72)。13岁及以上受者的无事件生存期比13岁以下受者差(风险比为1.74,95%CI为1.24 - 2.45;p = 0.0014),接受单倍体相合相关供者移植的患者(5.30,3.17 - 8.86;p < 0.0001)、匹配的无关供者移植的患者(3.71,2.39 - 5.75;p < 0.0001)和不匹配的无关供者移植的患者(4.34,2.58 - 7.32;p < 0.0001)的无事件生存期比接受匹配同胞供者移植的患者差。非同胞供者移植的受者之间无事件生存期无显著差异:单倍体相合相关供者(1.43,0.81 - 2.50;p = 0.21)或不匹配的无关供者(1.17,0.67 - 2.05;p = 0.58)与HLA匹配的无关供者相比,以及不匹配的无关供者与单倍体相合相关供者相比(1.22,0.65 - 2.27;p = 0.98)。接受减低强度方案预处理的患者的无事件生存期也比接受非清髓性方案预处理的患者差(1.97,1.15 - 3.36;p = 0.013),但接受清髓性方案与非清髓性方案预处理的患者之间无差异(1.57,0.95 - 2.61;p = 0.079)。
我们的数据表明,12岁及以下接受异基因移植且有HLA匹配同胞供者的镰状细胞病患者的无事件生存期得到改善。对于没有匹配同胞供者进行移植的患者,在这种情况下我们的数据并不支持一种替代供者类型优于另一种。
美国国立卫生研究院和美国卫生与公众服务部卫生服务研究管理局。