Bitton Asaf, Fifield Jocelyn, Ratcliffe Hannah, Karlage Ami, Wang Hong, Veillard Jeremy H, Schwarz Dan, Hirschhorn Lisa R
Ariadne Labs, Boston, Massachusetts, USA.
Division of General Medicine, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Boston, Massachusetts, USA.
BMJ Glob Health. 2019 Aug 16;4(Suppl 8):e001551. doi: 10.1136/bmjgh-2019-001551. eCollection 2019.
The 2018 Astana Declaration reaffirmed global commitment to primary healthcare (PHC) as a core strategy to achieve universal health coverage. To meet this potential, PHC in low-income and middle-income countries (LMIC) needs to be strengthened, but research is lacking and fragmented. We conducted a scoping review of the recent literature to assess the state of research on PHC in LMIC and understand where future research is most needed.
Guided by the Primary Healthcare Performance Initiative (PHCPI) conceptual framework, we conducted searches of the peer-reviewed literature on PHC in LMIC published between 2010 (the publication year of the last major review of PHC in LMIC) and 2017. We also conducted country-specific searches to understand performance trajectories in 14 high-performing countries identified in the previous review. Evidence highlights and gaps for each topic area of the PHCPI framework were extracted and summarised.
We retrieved 5219 articles, 207 of which met final inclusion criteria. Many PHC system inputs such as payment and workforce are well-studied. A number of emerging service delivery innovations have early evidence of success but lack evidence for how to scale more broadly. Community-based PHC systems with supportive governmental policies and financing structures (public and private) consistently promote better outcomes and equity. Among the 14 highlighted countries, most maintained or improved progress in the scope of services, quality, access and financial coverage of PHC during the review time period.
Our findings revealed a heterogeneous focus of recent literature, with ample evidence for effective PHC policies, payment and other system inputs. More variability was seen in key areas of service delivery, underscoring a need for greater emphasis on implementation science and intervention testing. Future evaluations are needed on PHC system capacities and orientation toward social accountability, innovation, management and population health in order to achieve the promise of PHC.
《2018年阿斯塔纳宣言》重申了全球对初级卫生保健(PHC)的承诺,将其作为实现全民健康覆盖的核心战略。为发挥这一潜力,低收入和中等收入国家(LMIC)的初级卫生保健需要得到加强,但相关研究匮乏且零散。我们对近期文献进行了范围界定审查,以评估LMIC中初级卫生保健的研究现状,并了解未来最需要开展研究的领域。
在初级卫生保健绩效倡议(PHCPI)概念框架的指导下,我们检索了2010年(上次对LMIC中初级卫生保健进行重大审查的出版年份)至2017年间发表的关于LMIC中初级卫生保健的同行评审文献。我们还针对特定国家进行了检索,以了解上次审查中确定的14个高绩效国家的绩效轨迹。提取并总结了PHCPI框架各主题领域的证据亮点和差距。
我们检索到5219篇文章,其中207篇符合最终纳入标准。许多初级卫生保健系统投入,如支付和劳动力等方面已有充分研究。一些新兴的服务提供创新有早期成功证据,但缺乏如何更广泛推广的证据。具有支持性政府政策和融资结构(公共和私人)的基于社区的初级卫生保健系统始终能促进更好的成果和公平性。在14个突出的国家中,大多数在审查期间在初级卫生保健的服务范围、质量、可及性和财务覆盖方面保持或改善了进展。
我们的研究结果显示近期文献关注的重点各异,有充分证据表明初级卫生保健政策、支付和其他系统投入是有效的。在服务提供的关键领域存在更多差异,这凸显需要更加强调实施科学和干预测试。为实现初级卫生保健的前景,未来需要对初级卫生保健系统能力以及其在社会问责、创新、管理和人群健康方面的定位进行评估。