• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

2019 年欧洲抗风湿病联盟/美国风湿病学会标准与 1997 年美国风湿病学会标准和 2012 年系统性红斑狼疮国际协作临床中心标准在儿童系统性红斑狼疮中的比较验证。

Validation of the 2019 European League Against Rheumatism/American College of Rheumatology Criteria Compared to the 1997 American College of Rheumatology Criteria and the 2012 Systemic Lupus International Collaborating Clinics Criteria in Pediatric Systemic Lupus Erythematosus.

机构信息

Steven and Alexandra Cohen Children's Medical Center of New York, Lake Success, New York, United States.

Steven and Alexandra Cohen Children's Medical Center of New York, Lake Success, New York, and Hofstra Northwell School of Medicine, Hempstead, New York, United States.

出版信息

Arthritis Care Res (Hoboken). 2020 Nov;72(11):1597-1601. doi: 10.1002/acr.24057.

DOI:10.1002/acr.24057
PMID:31478595
Abstract

OBJECTIVE

Different classification criteria for systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE) have been proposed for many years. The most widely used and accepted criteria has been the 1997 American College of Rheumatology (ACR) criteria. In 2012, the Systemic Lupus International Collaborating Clinics (SLICC) criteria were published in an attempt to improve the clinical relevance of SLE criteria. In 2017, weighted criteria were proposed that included entry criteria, something the 1997 ACR and the 2012 SLICC criteria did not identify. The aim of the present study was to validate the 2017 weighted criteria, the 1997 ACR criteria, and the 2012 SLICC criteria and compare the sensitivities and specificities in pediatric SLE.

METHODS

For the past 15 years, retrospective chart review of patients diagnosed with SLE before age 19 years was conducted. The controls were patients referred for serologies positive for antinuclear antibodies but did not fulfill criteria for diagnosis of SLE at the initial visit or were diagnosed with another autoimmune disease. The 3 classification criteria sets were applied to these patients and compared against a gold standard of physician diagnosis.

RESULTS

A total of 156 patients were diagnosed with SLE. The sensitivity for the 2017 weighted criteria was 0.974 (95% confidence interval [95% CI] 0.936-0.993) and the specificity was 0.984 (95% CI 0.966-0.994). The sensitivity for the 1997 ACR criteria was 0.872 (95% CI 0.809-0.920) and the specificity was 1.00 (95% CI 0.990-1.000). The sensitivity for the 2012 SLICC criteria was 0.974 (95% CI 0.936-0.993) and the specificity was 0.997 (95% CI 0.985-1.000).

CONCLUSION

The 2017 weighted criteria and the 2012 SLICC criteria were more sensitive than the 1997 ACR criteria. There were no significant differences in sensitivity and specificity between the 2012 SLICC and the 2017 weighted criteria.

摘要

目的

多年来,人们提出了多种系统性红斑狼疮(SLE)的分类标准。应用最广泛且被广泛接受的标准是 1997 年美国风湿病学会(ACR)标准。2012 年,国际狼疮协作组(SLICC)标准发表,旨在提高 SLE 标准的临床相关性。2017 年,提出了加权标准,其中包括纳入标准,这是 1997 年 ACR 和 2012 年 SLICC 标准未确定的。本研究旨在验证 2017 年加权标准、1997 年 ACR 标准和 2012 年 SLICC 标准,并比较在儿科 SLE 中的敏感性和特异性。

方法

在过去的 15 年中,对 19 岁以下被诊断为 SLE 的患者进行了回顾性病历审查。对照组为因抗核抗体阳性而就诊但在初次就诊时未达到 SLE 诊断标准或被诊断为其他自身免疫性疾病的患者。将这 3 组分类标准应用于这些患者,并与医生诊断的金标准进行比较。

结果

共诊断出 156 例 SLE 患者。2017 年加权标准的敏感性为 0.974(95%置信区间[95%CI]0.936-0.993),特异性为 0.984(95%CI 0.966-0.994)。1997 年 ACR 标准的敏感性为 0.872(95%CI 0.809-0.920),特异性为 1.00(95%CI 0.990-1.000)。2012 年 SLICC 标准的敏感性为 0.974(95%CI 0.936-0.993),特异性为 0.997(95%CI 0.985-1.000)。

结论

2017 年加权标准和 2012 年 SLICC 标准比 1997 年 ACR 标准更敏感。2012 年 SLICC 标准和 2017 年加权标准在敏感性和特异性方面无显著差异。

相似文献

1
Validation of the 2019 European League Against Rheumatism/American College of Rheumatology Criteria Compared to the 1997 American College of Rheumatology Criteria and the 2012 Systemic Lupus International Collaborating Clinics Criteria in Pediatric Systemic Lupus Erythematosus.2019 年欧洲抗风湿病联盟/美国风湿病学会标准与 1997 年美国风湿病学会标准和 2012 年系统性红斑狼疮国际协作临床中心标准在儿童系统性红斑狼疮中的比较验证。
Arthritis Care Res (Hoboken). 2020 Nov;72(11):1597-1601. doi: 10.1002/acr.24057.
2
Comparison of systemic lupus international collaborating clinics 2012 classification criteria and European league against rheumatism/American college of rheumatology 2019 classification criteria for early detection of childhood onset systemic lupus erythematosus (multi-center study).比较系统性红斑狼疮国际协作组 2012 分类标准与欧洲抗风湿病联盟/美国风湿病学会 2019 年儿童发病系统性红斑狼疮早期检测分类标准(多中心研究)。
Lupus. 2024 May;33(6):629-637. doi: 10.1177/09612033241240830. Epub 2024 Mar 27.
3
Comparison of Sensitivities of American College of Rheumatology and Systemic Lupus International Collaborating Clinics Classification Criteria in Childhood-onset Systemic Lupus Erythematosus.美国风湿病学会与国际系统性红斑狼疮协作组分类标准在儿童发病系统性红斑狼疮中敏感性的比较。
J Rheumatol. 2019 Jul;46(7):731-738. doi: 10.3899/jrheum.180337. Epub 2019 Feb 15.
4
Performance of the 2012 Systemic Lupus International Collaborating Clinics and the 1997 American College of Rheumatology classification criteria for systemic lupus erythematosus in a real-life scenario.2012 年系统性红斑狼疮国际协作组临床标准与 1997 年美国风湿病学会系统性红斑狼疮分类标准在真实世界场景中的表现。
Arthritis Care Res (Hoboken). 2015 Mar;67(3):437-41. doi: 10.1002/acr.22422.
5
Diagnostic accuracy of the European League against rheumatism/American College of Rheumatology-2019 versus the Systemic Lupus International Collaborating Clinics-2012 versus the ACR-1997 classification criteria in adult systemic lupus erythematosus: A systematic review and meta-analysis.欧洲抗风湿病联盟/美国风湿病学会 2019 年与系统性红斑狼疮国际协作临床中心 2012 年和美国风湿病学会 1997 年分类标准对成人系统性红斑狼疮的诊断准确性:系统评价和荟萃分析。
Front Immunol. 2022 Oct 12;13:1023451. doi: 10.3389/fimmu.2022.1023451. eCollection 2022.
6
In an early SLE cohort the ACR-1997, SLICC-2012 and EULAR/ACR-2019 criteria classify non-overlapping groups of patients: use of all three criteria ensures optimal capture for clinical studies while their modification earlier classification and treatment.在一个早期 SLE 队列中,ACR-1997、SLICC-2012 和 EULAR/ACR-2019 标准将患者分为不重叠的组:使用所有三个标准可确保在修改早期分类和治疗时为临床研究提供最佳的捕获。
Ann Rheum Dis. 2020 Feb;79(2):232-241. doi: 10.1136/annrheumdis-2019-216155. Epub 2019 Nov 8.
7
The Performances of the ACR 1997, SLICC 2012, and EULAR/ACR 2019 Classification Criteria in Pediatric Systemic Lupus Erythematosus.ACR 1997、SLICC 2012 和 EULAR/ACR 2019 分类标准在儿童系统性红斑狼疮中的表现。
J Rheumatol. 2021 Jun;48(6):907-914. doi: 10.3899/jrheum.200871. Epub 2020 Nov 15.
8
Evaluation of the European League Against Rheumatism/American College of Rheumatology-2019 classification criteria in patients with childhood-onset systemic lupus erythematosus: a single-center retrospective study.评估欧洲抗风湿病联盟/美国风湿病学会 2019 年儿童发病系统性红斑狼疮分类标准:一项单中心回顾性研究。
Clin Rheumatol. 2022 Aug;41(8):2483-2489. doi: 10.1007/s10067-022-06138-7. Epub 2022 Apr 4.
9
Using the American College of Rheumatology (ACR) and Systemic Lupus International Collaborating Clinics (SLICC) criteria to determine the diagnosis of systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE) in patients with subacute cutaneous lupus erythematosus (SCLE).采用美国风湿病学会(ACR)和系统性红斑狼疮国际协作诊所(SLICC)的标准来确定亚急性皮肤型红斑狼疮(SCLE)患者的系统性红斑狼疮(SLE)诊断。
J Am Acad Dermatol. 2016 May;74(5):862-9. doi: 10.1016/j.jaad.2015.12.029. Epub 2016 Feb 18.
10
Comparison among ACR1997, SLICC and the new EULAR/ACR classification criteria in childhood-onset systemic lupus erythematosus.ACR1997、SLICC 与新的 EULAR/ACR 分类标准在儿童发病系统性红斑狼疮中的比较。
Adv Rheumatol. 2019 May 15;59(1):20. doi: 10.1186/s42358-019-0062-z.

引用本文的文献

1
Validation and optimization of classification criteria for childhood-onset systemic lupus erythematosus in a multi-center Chinese cohort.中国多中心队列中儿童期起病系统性红斑狼疮分类标准的验证与优化
Front Immunol. 2025 Jul 17;16:1611349. doi: 10.3389/fimmu.2025.1611349. eCollection 2025.
2
Early-onset lupus nephritis.早发性狼疮性肾炎
Clin Kidney J. 2024 Jul 13;17(8):sfae212. doi: 10.1093/ckj/sfae212. eCollection 2024 Aug.
3
Evaluating performance of the 2019 EULAR/ACR, 2012 SLICC, and 1997 ACR criteria for classifying adult-onset and childhood-onset systemic lupus erythematosus: A systematic review and meta-analysis.
评估2019年欧洲抗风湿病联盟/美国风湿病学会(EULAR/ACR)、2012年系统性红斑狼疮国际协作临床联盟(SLICC)及1997年美国风湿病学会(ACR)标准对成人起病和儿童起病的系统性红斑狼疮进行分类的性能:一项系统评价和荟萃分析。
Front Med (Lausanne). 2022 Dec 22;9:1093213. doi: 10.3389/fmed.2022.1093213. eCollection 2022.
4
A 4-year old presenting with fever and achiness.一名4岁儿童,伴有发热和疼痛。
SAGE Open Med Case Rep. 2021 Oct 28;9:2050313X211056416. doi: 10.1177/2050313X211056416. eCollection 2021.
5
Splenomegaly in Children and Adolescents.儿童和青少年的脾肿大
Front Pediatr. 2021 Jul 9;9:704635. doi: 10.3389/fped.2021.704635. eCollection 2021.
6
An Update on the Management of Childhood-Onset Systemic Lupus Erythematosus.儿童发病系统性红斑狼疮的治疗进展。
Paediatr Drugs. 2021 Jul;23(4):331-347. doi: 10.1007/s40272-021-00457-z. Epub 2021 Jul 10.
7
Assessment of EULAR/ACR-2019, SLICC-2012 and ACR-1997 Classification Criteria in SLE with Longstanding Disease.对EULAR/ACR-2019、SLICC-2012和ACR-1997标准在长期病程系统性红斑狼疮中的分类评估
J Clin Med. 2021 May 28;10(11):2377. doi: 10.3390/jcm10112377.