• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

对EULAR/ACR-2019、SLICC-2012和ACR-1997标准在长期病程系统性红斑狼疮中的分类评估

Assessment of EULAR/ACR-2019, SLICC-2012 and ACR-1997 Classification Criteria in SLE with Longstanding Disease.

作者信息

Magallares Berta, Lobo-Prat David, Castellví Ivan, Moya Patricia, Gich Ignasi, Martinez-Martinez Laura, Park Hye, Millán Ana Milena, Laiz Ana, Díaz-Torné César, Fernandez Susana, Corominas Hèctor

机构信息

Department of Rheumatology, Hospital de la Santa Creu i Sant Pau, 08025 Barcelona, Spain.

Sant Pau Biomedical Research Institute (IIB Sant Pau), 08025 Barcelona, Spain.

出版信息

J Clin Med. 2021 May 28;10(11):2377. doi: 10.3390/jcm10112377.

DOI:10.3390/jcm10112377
PMID:34071275
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC8198204/
Abstract

BACKGROUND

Different classification criteria for systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE) have been launched over the years. Our aim was to evaluate the performance of the EULAR/ACR-2019, SLICC-2012 and ACR-1997 classification criteria in a cohort of SLE patients with longstanding disease.

METHODS

Descriptive observational study in 79 patients with established and longstanding SLE. The three classification criteria sets were applied to those patients.

RESULTS

Of the 79 patients, 70 were women (88.6%), with a mean age of 51.8 ± 14 years and a mean disease duration of 15.2 ± 11.5 years. The sensitivity of the different criteria were: 51.9%, 87.3% and 86.1% for ACR-1997, SLICC-2012 and EULAR/ACR-2019, respectively. In total, 68 out of 79 patients (53.7%) met all three classification criteria; 11.4% did not meet any classification criteria and were characterized by low SLEDAI (0.6 ± 0.9), low SLICC/ACR Damage Index (0.88 ± 0.56) and fulfilling only skin domains, antiphospholipid antibodies or hypocomplementemia. To fulfill EULAR/ACR-2019 criteria was associated with low complement levels ( < 0.04), high anti-dsDNA levels ( < 0.001), presence of lupus nephritis III-IV ( < 0.05) and arthritis ( < 0.001).

CONCLUSION

The EULAR/ACR-2019 classification criteria showed high sensitivity, similar to SLICC-2012, in SLE patients with longstanding disease. Patients with serological, articular or renal involvement are more likely to fulfill SLICC-2012 or EULAR/ACR-2019 criteria.

摘要

背景

多年来已推出不同的系统性红斑狼疮(SLE)分类标准。我们的目的是评估欧洲抗风湿病联盟/美国风湿病学会(EULAR/ACR)2019年、系统性红斑狼疮国际协作临床联盟(SLICC)2012年和美国风湿病学会(ACR)1997年分类标准在一组患有长期疾病的SLE患者中的表现。

方法

对79例确诊且患有长期SLE的患者进行描述性观察研究。将这三种分类标准应用于这些患者。

结果

79例患者中,70例为女性(88.6%),平均年龄为51.8±14岁,平均病程为15.2±11.5年。不同标准的敏感性分别为:ACR-1997为51.9%,SLICC-2012为87.3%,EULAR/ACR-2019为86.1%。79例患者中共有68例(53.7%)符合所有三种分类标准;11.4%的患者不符合任何分类标准,其特点是系统性红斑狼疮疾病活动指数(SLEDAI)较低(0.6±0.9)、系统性红斑狼疮国际协作临床联盟/美国风湿病学会损伤指数(SLICC/ACR)较低(0.88±0.56),仅满足皮肤领域、抗磷脂抗体或低补体血症。符合EULAR/ACR-2019标准与低补体水平(<0.04)、高抗双链DNA水平(<0.001)、狼疮性肾炎III-IV期(<0.05)和关节炎(<0.001)相关。

结论

EULAR/ACR-2019分类标准在患有长期疾病的SLE患者中显示出与SLICC-2012相似的高敏感性。有血清学、关节或肾脏受累的患者更有可能符合SLICC-2012或EULAR/ACR-2019标准。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/7235/8198204/d6405027dca0/jcm-10-02377-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/7235/8198204/d6405027dca0/jcm-10-02377-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/7235/8198204/d6405027dca0/jcm-10-02377-g001.jpg

相似文献

1
Assessment of EULAR/ACR-2019, SLICC-2012 and ACR-1997 Classification Criteria in SLE with Longstanding Disease.对EULAR/ACR-2019、SLICC-2012和ACR-1997标准在长期病程系统性红斑狼疮中的分类评估
J Clin Med. 2021 May 28;10(11):2377. doi: 10.3390/jcm10112377.
2
Avoiding misclassification of thrombotic primary antiphospholipid syndrome as systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE): What are the best-performing SLE classification criteria?避免将血栓性原发性抗磷脂综合征误诊为系统性红斑狼疮(SLE):哪些是表现最佳的 SLE 分类标准?
Lupus. 2021 Oct;30(11):1732-1738. doi: 10.1177/09612033211033978. Epub 2021 Jul 22.
3
Diagnostic accuracy of the European League against rheumatism/American College of Rheumatology-2019 versus the Systemic Lupus International Collaborating Clinics-2012 versus the ACR-1997 classification criteria in adult systemic lupus erythematosus: A systematic review and meta-analysis.欧洲抗风湿病联盟/美国风湿病学会 2019 年与系统性红斑狼疮国际协作临床中心 2012 年和美国风湿病学会 1997 年分类标准对成人系统性红斑狼疮的诊断准确性:系统评价和荟萃分析。
Front Immunol. 2022 Oct 12;13:1023451. doi: 10.3389/fimmu.2022.1023451. eCollection 2022.
4
The Performances of the ACR 1997, SLICC 2012, and EULAR/ACR 2019 Classification Criteria in Pediatric Systemic Lupus Erythematosus.ACR 1997、SLICC 2012 和 EULAR/ACR 2019 分类标准在儿童系统性红斑狼疮中的表现。
J Rheumatol. 2021 Jun;48(6):907-914. doi: 10.3899/jrheum.200871. Epub 2020 Nov 15.
5
In an early SLE cohort the ACR-1997, SLICC-2012 and EULAR/ACR-2019 criteria classify non-overlapping groups of patients: use of all three criteria ensures optimal capture for clinical studies while their modification earlier classification and treatment.在一个早期 SLE 队列中,ACR-1997、SLICC-2012 和 EULAR/ACR-2019 标准将患者分为不重叠的组:使用所有三个标准可确保在修改早期分类和治疗时为临床研究提供最佳的捕获。
Ann Rheum Dis. 2020 Feb;79(2):232-241. doi: 10.1136/annrheumdis-2019-216155. Epub 2019 Nov 8.
6
Comparison of systemic lupus international collaborating clinics 2012 classification criteria and European league against rheumatism/American college of rheumatology 2019 classification criteria for early detection of childhood onset systemic lupus erythematosus (multi-center study).比较系统性红斑狼疮国际协作组 2012 分类标准与欧洲抗风湿病联盟/美国风湿病学会 2019 年儿童发病系统性红斑狼疮早期检测分类标准(多中心研究)。
Lupus. 2024 May;33(6):629-637. doi: 10.1177/09612033241240830. Epub 2024 Mar 27.
7
Applying SLICC and ACR/EULAR systemic lupus erythematosus classification criteria in a cohort of patients with undifferentiated connective tissue disease.应用 SLICC 和 ACR/EULAR 系统性红斑狼疮分类标准于一组未分化结缔组织病患者。
Lupus. 2021 Feb;30(2):280-284. doi: 10.1177/0961203320976939. Epub 2020 Nov 30.
8
Relationship between the EULAR/ACR classification criteria and organ damage in systemic lupus erythematosus.欧洲抗风湿病联盟/美国风湿病学会分类标准与系统性红斑狼疮器官损伤之间的关系。
Lupus. 2023 Mar;32(3):424-430. doi: 10.1177/09612033231153791. Epub 2023 Jan 18.
9
Evaluating the performance of ACR, SLICC and EULAR/ACR classification criteria in childhood onset systemic lupus erythematosus.评估 ACR、SLICC 和 EULAR/ACR 分类标准在儿童发病系统性红斑狼疮中的表现。
Pediatr Rheumatol Online J. 2021 Sep 9;19(1):141. doi: 10.1186/s12969-021-00619-w.
10
Performance of the 2019 European League Against Rheumatism/American College of Rheumatology classification criteria for systemic lupus erythematosus in a multiethnic Malaysian cohort.2019 年欧洲抗风湿病联盟/美国风湿病学会系统性红斑狼疮分类标准在马来西亚多民族队列中的表现。
Int J Rheum Dis. 2022 Feb;25(2):131-139. doi: 10.1111/1756-185X.14269. Epub 2021 Dec 23.

引用本文的文献

1
The Effect of Estradiol and Testosterone Levels Alone or in Combination with Their Receptors in Predicting the Severity of Systemic Lupus Erythematosus: A Cohort Study.单独或与其受体联合的雌二醇和睾酮水平在预测系统性红斑狼疮严重程度中的作用:一项队列研究
Iran J Med Sci. 2025 Feb 1;50(2):69-76. doi: 10.30476/ijms.2024.101457.3414. eCollection 2025 Feb.
2
Favourable humoral but reduced cellular immune response to COVID-19 mRNA BNT162b2 vaccine in patients with childhood-onset systemic lupus erythematosus.COVID-19 mRNA BNT162b2 疫苗在儿童发病系统性红斑狼疮患者中诱导有利的体液但降低的细胞免疫应答。
Lupus Sci Med. 2024 Sep 20;11(2):e001268. doi: 10.1136/lupus-2024-001268.
3

本文引用的文献

1
New EULAR/ACR 2019 SLE Classification Criteria: defining ominosity in SLE.新的 2019 年 EULAR/ACR 系统性红斑狼疮分类标准:定义系统性红斑狼疮的凶险性。
Ann Rheum Dis. 2021 Jun;80(6):767-774. doi: 10.1136/annrheumdis-2020-218670. Epub 2021 Jan 15.
2
Performance of the New 2019 European League Against Rheumatism/American College of Rheumatology Classification Criteria for Systemic Lupus Erythematosus in Children and Young Adults.新 2019 年欧洲抗风湿病联盟/美国风湿病学会系统性红斑狼疮分类标准在儿童和青年人群中的表现。
Arthritis Care Res (Hoboken). 2021 Apr;73(4):580-585. doi: 10.1002/acr.24430.
3
Performance of the 2019 EULAR/ACR classification criteria for systemic lupus erythematosus in early disease, across sexes and ethnicities.
A Clinical Picture of Unselected Patients with Systemic Lupus Erythematosus in a Tertiary Hungarian Center-A Spectrum Ranging from Pure Lupus to Overlap Syndromes.
匈牙利一家三级医疗中心未选择的系统性红斑狼疮患者的临床情况——从单纯狼疮到重叠综合征的范围
J Clin Med. 2024 May 31;13(11):3251. doi: 10.3390/jcm13113251.
4
Kikuchi-Fujimoto disease, simultaneously diagnosed with systemic lupus erythematosus in an Arabic female: an agonizing combination.菊池古氏病,同时诊断为阿拉伯女性的系统性红斑狼疮:一个痛苦的组合。
J Int Med Res. 2024 May;52(5):3000605241248884. doi: 10.1177/03000605241248884.
5
Neuropsychiatric Systemic Lupus Erythematosus: Molecules Involved in Its Imunopathogenesis, Clinical Features, and Treatment.神经精神性狼疮:其免疫发病机制、临床特征和治疗中涉及的分子。
Molecules. 2024 Feb 6;29(4):747. doi: 10.3390/molecules29040747.
6
Mesenchymal stem cells modulate IL-17 and IL-9 production induced by Th17-inducing cytokine conditions in autoimmune arthritis: an explorative analysis.间充质干细胞调节 Th17 诱导细胞因子条件下自身免疫性关节炎中 IL-17 和 IL-9 的产生:探索性分析。
Adv Rheumatol. 2023 Jul 31;63(1):37. doi: 10.1186/s42358-023-00317-z.
7
Diagnostic accuracy of the European League against rheumatism/American College of Rheumatology-2019 versus the Systemic Lupus International Collaborating Clinics-2012 versus the ACR-1997 classification criteria in adult systemic lupus erythematosus: A systematic review and meta-analysis.欧洲抗风湿病联盟/美国风湿病学会 2019 年与系统性红斑狼疮国际协作临床中心 2012 年和美国风湿病学会 1997 年分类标准对成人系统性红斑狼疮的诊断准确性:系统评价和荟萃分析。
Front Immunol. 2022 Oct 12;13:1023451. doi: 10.3389/fimmu.2022.1023451. eCollection 2022.
8
Evaluation of the EULAR/American College of Rheumatology Classification Criteria for Systemic Lupus Erythematosus in a Population-Based Registry.基于人群登记处的评估:EULAR/美国风湿病学会系统性红斑狼疮分类标准。
Arthritis Care Res (Hoboken). 2023 May;75(5):1007-1016. doi: 10.1002/acr.24960. Epub 2023 Jan 11.
2019 年 EULAR/ACR 系统性红斑狼疮分类标准在早期疾病、不同性别和种族中的表现。
Ann Rheum Dis. 2020 Oct;79(10):1333-1339. doi: 10.1136/annrheumdis-2020-217162. Epub 2020 Aug 14.
4
New Criteria for Lupus.狼疮的新诊断标准
Curr Rheumatol Rep. 2020 May 13;22(6):18. doi: 10.1007/s11926-020-00896-6.
5
Application of the 2019 European League Against Rheumatism/American College of Rheumatology systemic lupus erythematosus classification criteria in clinical practice: a single center experience.2019 年欧洲抗风湿病联盟/美国风湿病学会系统性红斑狼疮分类标准在临床实践中的应用:单中心经验。
Lupus. 2020 Apr;29(4):421-425. doi: 10.1177/0961203320908939. Epub 2020 Feb 25.
6
Validation of the 2019 ACR/EULAR classification criteria of systemic lupus erythematosus in 100 Japanese patients: a real-world setting analysis.验证 2019 年 ACR/EULAR 系统性红斑狼疮分类标准在 100 例日本患者中的应用:真实世界设定分析。
Clin Rheumatol. 2020 Jun;39(6):1823-1827. doi: 10.1007/s10067-019-04848-z. Epub 2020 Feb 12.
7
EULAR/ACR classification criteria for SLE.EULAR/ACR 系统性红斑狼疮分类标准。
Semin Arthritis Rheum. 2019 Dec;49(3S):S14-S17. doi: 10.1016/j.semarthrit.2019.09.009.
8
In an early SLE cohort the ACR-1997, SLICC-2012 and EULAR/ACR-2019 criteria classify non-overlapping groups of patients: use of all three criteria ensures optimal capture for clinical studies while their modification earlier classification and treatment.在一个早期 SLE 队列中,ACR-1997、SLICC-2012 和 EULAR/ACR-2019 标准将患者分为不重叠的组:使用所有三个标准可确保在修改早期分类和治疗时为临床研究提供最佳的捕获。
Ann Rheum Dis. 2020 Feb;79(2):232-241. doi: 10.1136/annrheumdis-2019-216155. Epub 2019 Nov 8.
9
Validation of the 2019 European League Against Rheumatism/American College of Rheumatology Criteria Compared to the 1997 American College of Rheumatology Criteria and the 2012 Systemic Lupus International Collaborating Clinics Criteria in Pediatric Systemic Lupus Erythematosus.2019 年欧洲抗风湿病联盟/美国风湿病学会标准与 1997 年美国风湿病学会标准和 2012 年系统性红斑狼疮国际协作临床中心标准在儿童系统性红斑狼疮中的比较验证。
Arthritis Care Res (Hoboken). 2020 Nov;72(11):1597-1601. doi: 10.1002/acr.24057.
10
2019 European League Against Rheumatism/American College of Rheumatology Classification Criteria for Systemic Lupus Erythematosus.2019 年欧洲抗风湿病联盟/美国风湿病学会系统性红斑狼疮分类标准。
Arthritis Rheumatol. 2019 Sep;71(9):1400-1412. doi: 10.1002/art.40930. Epub 2019 Aug 6.