The effect of undetected recombination on genealogy sampling and inference under an isolation-with-migration model.

Many methods for fitting demographic models to data sets of aligned sequences rely upon an assumption that the data have a branching coalescent history without recombination within regions or loci. To mitigate the effects of the failure of this assumption, a common approach is to filter data and sample regions that pass the four-gamete criterion for recombination, an approach that allows data to run, but that is expected to detect only a minority of recombination events. A series of empirical tests of this approach were conducted using computer simulations with and without recombination for a variety of isolation-with-migration (IM) model for two and three populations. Only the IMa3 program was used, but the general results should apply to related genealogy-sampling-based methods for IM models or subsets of IM models. It was found that the details of sampling intervals that pass a four-gamete filter have a moderate effect, and that schemes that use the longest intervals, or that use overlapping intervals, gave poorer results. A simple approach of using a random nonoverlapping interval returned the smallest difference between results with and without recombination, with the mean difference between parameter estimates usually less than 20% of the true value (usually much less). However, the posterior probability distributions for migration rates were flatter with recombination, suggesting that filtering based on the four-gamete criterion, while necessary for methods like these, leads to reduced resolution on migration. A distinct, alternative approach, of using a finite sites mutation model and not filtering the data, performed quite poorly.