Department of Neurosciences, Psychology, Drug Research and Child Health (NEUROFARBA), University of Florence, 50139, Florence, Italy.
Division of Cardiology, University Hospital, Perugia, Italy.
Pharmacol Res. 2019 Oct;148:104418. doi: 10.1016/j.phrs.2019.104418. Epub 2019 Aug 31.
Efficacy and safety profiles of different pharmacological interventions used to treat patent ductus arteriosus (PDA) are relatively unexplored. Integrating the findings of randomized clinical trials (RCTs) with those from observational studies may provide key evidence on this important issue. We aimed at estimating the relative likelihood of failure to close the PDA, need for surgical closure, and occurrence of adverse events among preterm and full-term infants treated with indomethacin, ibuprofen, or acetaminophen, placebo, or no treatment including both RCTs and observational studies. We searched PubMed, Embase, and the Register of Controlled Trials from inception to October 30, 2018. We first estimated proportions of subjects with failure to close the PDA, subjects in whom surgical closure was performed after pharmacological treatment, death, and subjects with selected adverse events (AEs). These estimates were obtained using frequentist random-effect meta-analysis of arm-specific proportions. We then compared active drugs with each other and with control (either placebo or no treatment) by summarizing results at the end of treatment reported in the papers, regardless of number of administration(s), dose, route and type of administration, and study design and quality. We also summarized primary outcome results separately at first, second and third cycles of treatment. These estimates were obtained using Bayesian random-effects network meta-analysis for mixed comparisons, and frequentist random-effect pairwise meta-analysis for direct comparisons. We included 64 RCTs and 24 observational studies including 14,568 subjects (5339 in RCTs and 9229 in observational studies, 8292 subjects received indomethacin, 4761 ibuprofen, 574 acetaminophen, and 941 control (including placebo or no intervention).The proportion of subjects with failure to close the PDA was 0.24 (95% Confidence Interval, CI: 0.20, 0.29) for indomethacin, 0.18 (0.14, 0.22) for ibuprofen, 0.19 (0.09, 0.30) for acetaminophen, and 0.59 (0.48, 0.69) for control. At end of treatment, compared to control, we found inverse associations between all active drugs and failure to close PDA (for indomethacin Odds Ratio, OR, was 0.17 [95% Credible Interval, CrI: 0.11-0.24], ibuprofen 0.19 [0.12-0.28], and acetaminophen 0.15 [0.09-0.26]), without differences among active drugs. We showed inverse associations between effective drugs and need for surgical closure, as compared to control (for indomethacin OR was 0.28 [0.15-0.50], ibuprofen 0.30 [0.16-0.54], and acetaminophen 0.19 [0.07-0.46]), without differences among drugs. Indomethacin was directly associated with intraventricular hemorrhage (IVH) (1.27; 1.00, 1.62) compared to ibuprofen, and to oliguria as compared to ibuprofen (3.92; 1.69, 9.82) or acetaminophen (10.8; 1.86, 93.1). In conclusion, active pharmacological treatment, with indomethacin, ibuprofen, or acetaminophen, is inversely associated with failure to close the PDA compared to non-treatment. Ibuprofen should be preferred to indomethacin to avoid occurrence of IVH or oliguria, acetaminophen should be preferred to indomethacin to avoid oliguria.
不同的药理学干预措施治疗动脉导管未闭(PDA)的疗效和安全性相对未知。将随机临床试验(RCT)的结果与观察性研究的结果相结合,可能为这一重要问题提供关键证据。我们旨在估计早产儿和足月儿接受吲哚美辛、布洛芬或对乙酰氨基酚、安慰剂或包括 RCT 和观察性研究在内的无治疗时 PDA 未闭、需要手术闭合和发生不良事件的相对可能性。我们检索了 PubMed、Embase 和对照试验登记处,检索时间为 2018 年 10 月 30 日。我们首先估计了 PDA 未闭的受试者比例、药物治疗后行手术闭合的受试者比例、死亡受试者比例以及出现特定不良事件(AE)的受试者比例。这些估计是使用每个手臂特定比例的频率随机效应荟萃分析获得的。然后,我们通过总结论文中报告的治疗结束时的结果,将活性药物与对照组(安慰剂或无治疗)进行比较,无论给药次数、剂量、途径和给药类型以及研究设计和质量如何。我们还分别在第一个、第二个和第三个治疗周期总结了主要结局结果。这些估计是通过混合比较的贝叶斯随机效应网络荟萃分析和直接比较的频率随机效应成对荟萃分析获得的。我们纳入了 64 项 RCT 和 24 项观察性研究,共纳入 14568 名受试者(5339 名在 RCT 中,9229 名在观察性研究中,8292 名受试者接受吲哚美辛治疗,4761 名接受布洛芬治疗,574 名接受对乙酰氨基酚治疗,941 名接受对照组(包括安慰剂或无干预)。吲哚美辛组、布洛芬组、对乙酰氨基酚组和对照组的 PDA 未闭比例分别为 0.24(95%置信区间,CI:0.20,0.29)、0.18(0.14,0.22)、0.19(0.09,0.30)和 0.59(0.48,0.69)。在治疗结束时,与对照组相比,我们发现所有活性药物与 PDA 未闭呈负相关(吲哚美辛的比值比,OR,为 0.17 [95%可信区间,CrI:0.11-0.24],布洛芬为 0.19 [0.12-0.28],对乙酰氨基酚为 0.15 [0.09-0.26]),而活性药物之间没有差异。我们发现与对照组相比,有效药物与需要手术闭合呈负相关(吲哚美辛 OR 为 0.28 [0.15-0.50],布洛芬为 0.30 [0.16-0.54],对乙酰氨基酚为 0.19 [0.07-0.46]),而药物之间没有差异。与布洛芬相比,吲哚美辛与颅内出血(IVH)相关(1.27;1.00,1.62),与少尿相关(3.92;1.69,9.82)或与对乙酰氨基酚相关(10.8;1.86,93.1)。总之,与非治疗相比,用吲哚美辛、布洛芬或对乙酰氨基酚进行积极的药物治疗与 PDA 未闭呈负相关。与吲哚美辛相比,应优先选择布洛芬以避免发生 IVH 或少尿,与吲哚美辛相比,应优先选择对乙酰氨基酚以避免少尿。