• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

预测晚期青光眼患者的 Humphrey 10-2 视野值与 24-2 视野值的关系。

Predicting Humphrey 10-2 visual field from 24-2 visual field in eyes with advanced glaucoma.

机构信息

Ophthalmology, International University of Health and Welfare Mita Hospital, Tokyo, Japan

Department of Ophthalmology, University of Tokyo Graduate School of Medicine, Tokyo, Japan.

出版信息

Br J Ophthalmol. 2020 May;104(5):642-647. doi: 10.1136/bjophthalmol-2019-314170. Epub 2019 Sep 3.

DOI:10.1136/bjophthalmol-2019-314170
PMID:31481390
Abstract

AIMS

To predict Humphrey Field Analyzer Central 10-2 Swedish Interactive Threshold Algorithm-Standard test (HFA 10-2) results (Carl Zeiss Meditec, San Leandro, CA) from HFA 24-2 results of the same eyes with advanced glaucoma.

METHODS

Training and testing HFA 24-2 and 10-2 data sets, respectively, consisted of 175 eyes (175 patients) and 44 eyes (44 patients) with open advanced glaucoma (mean deviation of HFA 24-2 ≤-20 dB). Using the training data set, the 68 total deviation (TD) values of the HFA 10-2 test points were predicted from those of the innermost 16 HFA 24-2 test points in the same eye, using image processing or various machine learning methods including bilinear interpolation (IP) as a standard for comparison. The absolute prediction error (PredError) was calculated by applying each method to the testing data set.

RESULTS

The mean (SD) test-retest variability of the HFA 10-2 results in the testing data set was 2.1±1.0 dB, while the IP method yielded a PredError of 5.0±1.7 dB. Among the methods tested, support vector regression (SVR) provided a smallest PredError (4.0±1.5 dB). SVR predicted retinal sensitivity at HFA 10-2 test points in the preserved 'central isle' of advanced glaucoma from HFA 24-2 results of the same eye within an error range of about 25%, while error range was approximately twice of the test-retest variability.

CONCLUSION

Applying SVR to HFA 24-2 results allowed us to predict TD values at HFA 10-2 test points of the same eye with advanced glaucoma with an error range of about 25%.

摘要

目的

从同一患有晚期青光眼的眼睛的 Humphrey 视野分析仪 24-2 结果中预测 Humphrey 视野分析仪中央 10-2 瑞典互动阈值算法-标准测试(HFA 10-2)结果(卡尔蔡司 Meditec,圣莱安德罗,加利福尼亚)。

方法

训练和测试 HFA 24-2 和 10-2 数据集分别包括 175 只眼睛(175 名患者)和 44 只眼睛(44 名患者),这些眼睛患有开放性晚期青光眼(HFA 24-2 的平均偏差≤-20dB)。使用训练数据集,使用图像处理或各种机器学习方法(包括双线性内插(IP)作为比较的标准),从同一眼中最内的 16 个 HFA 24-2 测试点的那些预测 HFA 10-2 测试点的 68 个总偏差(TD)值。将每种方法应用于测试数据集来计算绝对预测误差(PredError)。

结果

测试数据集 HFA 10-2 结果的平均(SD)测试-重测变异性为 2.1±1.0dB,而 IP 方法的 PredError 为 5.0±1.7dB。在所测试的方法中,支持向量回归(SVR)提供了最小的 PredError(4.0±1.5dB)。SVR 从同一眼睛的 HFA 24-2 结果预测了晚期青光眼保留的“中央岛”中的 HFA 10-2 测试点的视网膜敏感度,误差范围约为 25%,而误差范围约为测试-重测变异性的两倍。

结论

将 SVR 应用于 HFA 24-2 结果可以使我们以约 25%的误差范围预测同一患有晚期青光眼的眼睛的 HFA 10-2 测试点的 TD 值。

相似文献

1
Predicting Humphrey 10-2 visual field from 24-2 visual field in eyes with advanced glaucoma.预测晚期青光眼患者的 Humphrey 10-2 视野值与 24-2 视野值的关系。
Br J Ophthalmol. 2020 May;104(5):642-647. doi: 10.1136/bjophthalmol-2019-314170. Epub 2019 Sep 3.
2
A Comparison between the Compass Fundus Perimeter and the Humphrey Field Analyzer.《Compass 眼底周边仪与 Humphrey 视野分析仪的比较》
Ophthalmology. 2019 Feb;126(2):242-251. doi: 10.1016/j.ophtha.2018.08.010. Epub 2018 Aug 14.
3
Comparison of Matrix with Humphrey Field Analyzer II with SITA.Matrix与Humphrey视野分析仪II和SITA的比较。
Optom Vis Sci. 2015 May;92(5):527-36. doi: 10.1097/OPX.0000000000000583.
4
Predicting the Extent of Damage in the Humphrey Field Analyzer 24-2 Visual Fields Using 10-2 Test Results in Patients With Advanced Glaucoma.使用高级青光眼患者的 10-2 测试结果预测 Humphrey 场分析仪 24-2 视野的损伤程度。
Transl Vis Sci Technol. 2024 Feb 1;13(2):2. doi: 10.1167/tvst.13.2.2.
5
Predicting the central 10 degrees visual field in glaucoma by applying a deep learning algorithm to optical coherence tomography images.应用深度学习算法对光学相干断层扫描图像预测青光眼的中央 10 度视野。
Sci Rep. 2021 Jan 26;11(1):2214. doi: 10.1038/s41598-020-79494-6.
6
Performance of frequency-doubling technology perimetry in a population-based prevalence survey of glaucoma: the Tajimi study.基于人群的青光眼患病率调查中倍频技术视野检查的表现:田美研究
Ophthalmology. 2007 Jan;114(1):27-32. doi: 10.1016/j.ophtha.2006.06.041. Epub 2006 Oct 27.
7
Multicenter Comparison of the Toronto Portable Perimeter with the Humphrey Field Analyzer: A Pilot Study.多伦多便携式视野计与汉弗莱视野分析仪的多中心比较:一项初步研究。
Ophthalmol Glaucoma. 2022 Mar-Apr;5(2):146-159. doi: 10.1016/j.ogla.2021.07.011. Epub 2021 Aug 4.
8
Comparing the Performance of Compass Perimetry With Humphrey Field Analyzer in Eyes With Glaucoma.比较指南针视野计与 Humphrey 视野分析仪在青光眼患者眼中的性能。
J Glaucoma. 2017 Mar;26(3):292-297. doi: 10.1097/IJG.0000000000000609.
9
Validation of a Head-mounted Virtual Reality Visual Field Screening Device.头戴式虚拟现实视野筛查设备的验证。
J Glaucoma. 2020 Feb;29(2):86-91. doi: 10.1097/IJG.0000000000001415.
10
Comparison and Correlation of Retinal Sensitivity Between Microperimetry and Standard Automated Perimetry in Low-tension Glaucoma.低眼压性青光眼中小视野计与自动视野计视网膜敏感度的比较与相关性。
J Glaucoma. 2020 Oct;29(10):975-980. doi: 10.1097/IJG.0000000000001599.

引用本文的文献

1
A Novel Approach To Predict Glaucomatous Impairment in the Central 10° Visual Field, Excluding the Effect of Cataract.一种新方法预测中央 10°视野的青光眼损害,排除白内障的影响。
Transl Vis Sci Technol. 2024 Oct 1;13(10):35. doi: 10.1167/tvst.13.10.35.
2
Transformer-Based Deep Learning Prediction of 10-Degree Humphrey Visual Field Tests From 24-Degree Data.基于 Transformer 的深度学习预测从 24 度数据到 10 度 Humphrey 视野测试结果。
Transl Vis Sci Technol. 2024 Aug 1;13(8):11. doi: 10.1167/tvst.13.8.11.
3
Predicting the Extent of Damage in the Humphrey Field Analyzer 24-2 Visual Fields Using 10-2 Test Results in Patients With Advanced Glaucoma.
使用高级青光眼患者的 10-2 测试结果预测 Humphrey 场分析仪 24-2 视野的损伤程度。
Transl Vis Sci Technol. 2024 Feb 1;13(2):2. doi: 10.1167/tvst.13.2.2.
4
Papillomacular bundle defect (PMBD) in glaucoma patients with high myopia: frequency and risk factors.青光眼高度近视患者的乳头黄斑束纤维缺损(PMBD):频率和危险因素。
Sci Rep. 2023 Dec 11;13(1):21958. doi: 10.1038/s41598-023-48687-0.
5
Predicting 60-4 visual field tests using 3D facial reconstruction.利用 3D 面部重建预测 60-4 视野测试。
Br J Ophthalmol. 2023 Dec 18;108(1):112-116. doi: 10.1136/bjo-2022-321651.
6
A Joint Multitask Learning Model for Cross-sectional and Longitudinal Predictions of Visual Field Using OCT.一种用于使用光学相干断层扫描(OCT)进行视野的横断面和纵向预测的联合多任务学习模型。
Ophthalmol Sci. 2021 Sep 7;1(4):100055. doi: 10.1016/j.xops.2021.100055. eCollection 2021 Dec.
7
Predicting the central 10 degrees visual field in glaucoma by applying a deep learning algorithm to optical coherence tomography images.应用深度学习算法对光学相干断层扫描图像预测青光眼的中央 10 度视野。
Sci Rep. 2021 Jan 26;11(1):2214. doi: 10.1038/s41598-020-79494-6.