Suppr超能文献

C1-C2 水平经皮脉冲射频治疗慢性丛集性头痛的安全性和有效性:21 例回顾性分析。

Safety and efficacy of percutaneous pulsed radiofrequency treatment at the C1-C2 level in chronic cluster headache: a retrospective analysis of 21 cases.

机构信息

Department of Neurology, Ghent University Hospital, Corneel Heymanslaan 10, 9000, Ghent, Belgium.

Pain Clinic, Ghent University Hospital, Corneel Heymanslaan 10, Ghent, 9000, Belgium.

出版信息

Acta Neurol Belg. 2019 Dec;119(4):601-605. doi: 10.1007/s13760-019-01203-6. Epub 2019 Sep 3.

Abstract

We performed a study of the safety and efficacy of percutaneous pulsed radiofrequency (PRF) treatment directed at C1 and C2 levels as performed at our local pain clinic in refractory chronic cluster headache (CCH) patients. We identified 21 CCH patients treated with PRF (240 s, max. 45 V, max. 42 °C) directed at the ganglion and/or nerve root of C1 and C2. Data were collected through retrospective analysis of patients' files and include demographic variables, onset and duration of the headache, mean attack frequency, and prior pharmacological treatment. Safety and reduction of attack frequency in the first 3 months after a first PRF treatment was the primary outcome parameter of this study. All patients had been treated with at least two prophylactic drugs and 19 (90%) had previously been treated with verapamil, lithium, and topiramate. Ten patients (47.6%) reported no meaningful effect, four patients (19%) reported a meaningful reduction of < 50%, and seven patients (33.3%) reported a reduction in headache burden of at least 50% in the 3 months following treatment. Two patients reported occurrence or increase in frequency of contralateral cluster attacks. No other adverse events were reported or detected at follow-up. Upper cervical PRF treatment appears to be a safe procedure that could prove effective in the treatment of patients with refractory CCH and warrants a prospective study.

摘要

我们在当地疼痛诊所对难治性慢性丛集性头痛(CCH)患者进行了 C1 和 C2 水平经皮脉冲射频(PRF)治疗的安全性和有效性研究。我们确定了 21 名接受 PRF 治疗(240 秒,最大 45 V,最大 42°C)的 CCH 患者,治疗靶点为 C1 和 C2 的神经节和/或神经根。通过对患者档案的回顾性分析收集数据,包括人口统计学变量、头痛的发作和持续时间、平均发作频率以及先前的药物治疗。本研究的主要观察指标是首次 PRF 治疗后 3 个月内的安全性和发作频率降低情况。所有患者均接受了至少两种预防性药物治疗,19 名患者(90%)之前接受过维拉帕米、锂和托吡酯治疗。10 名患者(47.6%)报告无明显效果,4 名患者(19%)报告有意义的减轻幅度<50%,7 名患者(33.3%)报告治疗后 3 个月头痛负担至少减轻 50%。2 名患者报告出现或增加对侧丛集性头痛发作的频率。随访时未报告或发现其他不良事件。上颈椎 PRF 治疗似乎是一种安全的治疗方法,可能对难治性 CCH 患者有效,值得进行前瞻性研究。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验