Department of Surgery, Faculty of Medicine and Health, Örebro University, Örebro, Sweden.
Institute of Medicine, Sahlgrenska Academy, University of Gothenburg, Göteborg, Sweden.
Thyroid. 2019 Nov;29(11):1545-1557. doi: 10.1089/thy.2019.0085.
The treatment efficacy of antithyroid drug (ATD) therapy, radioactive iodine (I), or surgery for Graves' hyperthyroidism is well described. However, there are a few reports on the long-term total outcome of each treatment modality regarding how many require levothyroxine supplementation, the need of thyroid ablation, or the individual patient's estimation of their recovery. We conducted a pragmatic trial to determine the effectiveness and adverse outcome in a patient cohort newly diagnosed with Graves' hyperthyroidism between 2003 and 2005 ( = 2430). The patients were invited to participate in a longitudinal study spanning 8 ± 0.9 years (mean ± standard deviation) after diagnosis. We were able to follow 1186 (60%) patients who had been treated with ATD, I, or surgery. We determined the mode of treatment, remission rate, recurrence, quality of life, demographic data, comorbidities, and lifestyle factors through questionnaires and a review of the individual's medical history records. At follow-up, the remission rate after first-line treatment choice with ATD was 45.3% (351/774), with I therapy 81.5% (324/264), and with surgery 96.3% (52/54). Among those patients who had a second course of ATD, 29.4% achieved remission (vs. the 45.3% after the first course of ATD). The total number of patients who had undergone ablative treatment was 64.3% (763/1186), of whom 23% (278/1186) had received surgery, 43% (505/1186) had received I therapy, including 2% (20/1186) who had received both surgery and I. Patients who received ATD as first-line treatment and possibly additional ATD had 49.7% risk (385/774) of having undergone ablative treatment at follow-up. Levothyroxine replacement was needed in 23% (81/351) of the initially ATD treated in remission, in 77.3% (204/264) of the I treated, and in 96.2% (50/52) of the surgically treated patients. Taken together after 6-10 years, and all treatment considered, normal thyroid hormone status without thyroxine supplementation was only achieved in 35.7% (423/1186) of all patients and in only 40.3% of those initially treated with ATD. The proportion of patients that did not feel fully recovered at follow-up was 25.3%. A patient selecting ATD therapy as the initial approach in the treatment of Graves' hyperthyroidism should be informed that they have only a 50.3% chance of ultimately avoiding ablative treatment and only a 40% chance of eventually being euthyroid without thyroid medication. Surprisingly, 1 in 4 patients did not feel fully recovered after 6-10 years. The treatment for Graves' hyperthyroidism, thus, has unexpected long-term consequences for many patients.
抗甲状腺药物 (ATD) 治疗、放射性碘 (I) 或手术治疗格雷夫斯甲亢的疗效已有很好的描述。然而,关于每种治疗方法的长期总结果,即有多少患者需要补充左旋甲状腺素、需要甲状腺消融或患者对自身恢复的个体评估,仅有少数报道。我们进行了一项实用临床试验,以确定 2003 年至 2005 年间新诊断为格雷夫斯甲亢的患者队列中的有效性和不良结局( = 2430)。这些患者被邀请参加一项跨越 8 ± 0.9 年(平均 ± 标准差)的纵向研究。我们能够随访 1186 名(60%)接受 ATD、I 或手术治疗的患者。我们通过问卷调查和个人病史记录确定了治疗方式、缓解率、复发、生活质量、人口统计学数据、合并症和生活方式因素。随访时,首次一线治疗选择 ATD 的缓解率为 45.3%(351/774),I 治疗为 81.5%(324/264),手术治疗为 96.3%(52/54)。在接受第二次 ATD 治疗的患者中,有 29.4%达到缓解(与首次 ATD 治疗的 45.3%相比)。接受消融治疗的患者总数为 64.3%(763/1186),其中 23%(278/1186)接受了手术,43%(505/1186)接受了 I 治疗,包括 2%(20/1186)同时接受了手术和 I 治疗。首次接受 ATD 治疗且可能接受额外 ATD 治疗的患者在随访时有 49.7%(385/774)的风险接受消融治疗。在最初接受 ATD 治疗缓解的患者中,有 23%(81/351)需要补充左旋甲状腺素,在接受 I 治疗的患者中,有 77.3%(204/264)需要补充,在接受手术治疗的患者中,有 96.2%(50/52)需要补充。在 6-10 年后综合所有治疗方法,所有患者中仅有 35.7%(423/1186)和最初接受 ATD 治疗的患者中仅有 40.3%达到正常甲状腺激素状态而无需甲状腺素补充。在随访时,有 25.3%的患者感觉没有完全康复。选择 ATD 治疗作为格雷夫斯甲亢初始治疗方法的患者应被告知,他们最终避免消融治疗的几率只有 50.3%,最终无需甲状腺药物即可达到甲状腺功能正常的几率只有 40%。令人惊讶的是,四分之一的患者在 6-10 年后仍感觉没有完全康复。因此,格雷夫斯甲亢的治疗对许多患者有出乎意料的长期影响。