• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

验证数据集成配置的语义正确性和完整性。

Verifying Data Integration Configurations for Semantical Correctness and Completeness.

作者信息

Stöhr Mark R, Günther Andreas, Majeed Raphael W

机构信息

UGMLC, German Center for Lung Research (DZL), Justus-Liebig-University, Giessen, Germany.

出版信息

Stud Health Technol Inform. 2019 Sep 3;267:66-73. doi: 10.3233/SHTI190807.

DOI:10.3233/SHTI190807
PMID:31483256
Abstract

Data integration is the problem of combining data residing at different sources and providing the user with a unified view of these data. In medical informatics, such a unified view enables retrospective analyses based on more facts and prospective recruitment of more patients than any single data collection by itself. The technical part of data integration is based on rules interpreted by software. These rules define how to perform the translation of source database schemata into the target database schema. Translation rules are formulated by data managers who usually do not have the knowledge about meaning and acquisition methods of the data they handle. The professionals (data providers) collecting the source data who have the respective knowledge again usually have no sufficient technical background. Since data providers are neither able to formulate the transformation rules themselves nor able to validate them, the whole process is fault-prone. Additionally, in continuous development and maintenance of (meta-) data repositories, data structures underlie changes, which may lead to outdated transformation rules. We did not find any technical solution, which enables data providers to formulate transformation rules themselves or which provides an understandable reflection of given rules. Our approach is to enable data providers understand the rules regarding their own data by presenting rules and available context visually. Context information is fetched from a metadata repository. In this paper, we propose a software tool that builds on existing data integration infrastructures. The tool provides a visually supported validation routine for data integration rules. In a first step towards its evaluation, we implement the tool into the DZL data integration process and verify the correct presentation of transformation rules.

摘要

数据集成是一个将驻留在不同源的数据进行合并,并为用户提供这些数据统一视图的问题。在医学信息学中,这样的统一视图能够进行基于更多事实的回顾性分析,并能比任何单一数据收集本身招募到更多的患者进行前瞻性研究。数据集成的技术部分基于软件解释的规则。这些规则定义了如何将源数据库模式转换为目标数据库模式。转换规则由数据管理人员制定,而他们通常并不了解所处理数据的含义和获取方法。收集源数据的专业人员(数据提供者)虽然具备相关知识,但通常又没有足够的技术背景。由于数据提供者既无法自行制定转换规则,也无法对其进行验证,整个过程容易出错。此外,在(元)数据存储库的持续开发和维护中,数据结构会发生变化,这可能导致转换规则过时。我们没有找到任何技术解决方案,能够让数据提供者自行制定转换规则,或者提供对给定规则的可理解的反映。我们的方法是通过直观地展示规则和可用上下文,让数据提供者理解关于他们自己数据的规则。上下文信息从元数据存储库中获取。在本文中,我们提出了一种基于现有数据集成基础设施构建的软件工具。该工具为数据集成规则提供了可视化支持的验证程序。在对其进行评估的第一步中,我们将该工具应用于DZL数据集成过程,并验证转换规则的正确呈现。

相似文献

1
Verifying Data Integration Configurations for Semantical Correctness and Completeness.验证数据集成配置的语义正确性和完整性。
Stud Health Technol Inform. 2019 Sep 3;267:66-73. doi: 10.3233/SHTI190807.
2
Toward a view-oriented approach for aligning RDF-based biomedical repositories.迈向一种基于视图的方法来对齐基于RDF的生物医学知识库。
Methods Inf Med. 2015;54(1):50-5. doi: 10.3414/ME13-02-0020. Epub 2014 Apr 29.
3
Provenance for Biomedical Ontologies with RDF and Git.使用RDF和Git的生物医学本体来源
Stud Health Technol Inform. 2019 Sep 3;267:230-237. doi: 10.3233/SHTI190832.
4
Scaling the walls of discovery: using semantic metadata for integrative problem solving.攀登发现之墙:利用语义元数据进行综合问题解决。
Brief Bioinform. 2009 Mar;10(2):164-76. doi: 10.1093/bib/bbp007.
5
QLMDR: a GraphQL query language for ISO 11179-based metadata repositories.QLMDR:基于 ISO 11179 的元数据存储库的 GraphQL 查询语言。
BMC Med Inform Decis Mak. 2019 Mar 18;19(1):45. doi: 10.1186/s12911-019-0794-z.
6
Using RDF and Git to Realize a Collaborative Metadata Repository.使用RDF和Git实现协作式元数据存储库。
Stud Health Technol Inform. 2018;247:556-560.
7
Towards a Federation of Metadata Repositories: Addressing Technical Interoperability.迈向元数据存储库联盟:解决技术互操作性问题。
Stud Health Technol Inform. 2019 Sep 3;267:74-80. doi: 10.3233/SHTI190808.
8
Automatic Detection of Metadata Errors in a Registry of Clinical Studies Using Shapes Constraint Language (SHACL) Graphs.使用形状约束语言 (SHACL) 图自动检测临床研究注册中的元数据错误。
Stud Health Technol Inform. 2021 May 27;281:372-376. doi: 10.3233/SHTI210183.
9
Graph-based data integration from bioactive peptide databases of pharmaceutical interest: toward an organized collection enabling visual network analysis.基于图的数据集成来自具有药物应用价值的生物活性肽数据库:构建一个有组织的集合以实现可视化网络分析。
Bioinformatics. 2019 Nov 1;35(22):4739-4747. doi: 10.1093/bioinformatics/btz260.
10
Pragmatic MDR: a metadata repository with bottom-up standardization of medical metadata through reuse.实用型 MDR:通过重用实现医疗元数据自底向上标准化的元数据存储库。
BMC Med Inform Decis Mak. 2021 May 17;21(1):160. doi: 10.1186/s12911-021-01524-8.

引用本文的文献

1
The Collaborative Metadata Repository (CoMetaR) Web App: Quantitative and Qualitative Usability Evaluation.协作式元数据存储库(CoMetaR)网络应用程序:定量与定性可用性评估
JMIR Med Inform. 2021 Nov 29;9(11):e30308. doi: 10.2196/30308.