Mental Health Centre Copenhagen, University of Copenhagen, Copenhagen, Denmark.
Research Unit of Psychiatry, Department of Clinical Research, University of Southern Denmark, Odense, Denmark.
JAMA Psychiatry. 2019 Dec 1;76(12):1232-1240. doi: 10.1001/jamapsychiatry.2019.2291.
Individual placement and support (IPS) seems to be an effective vocational intervention for people with severe mental illness, but its effects have not yet been shown in the Danish welfare model. Also, effects may be enhanced by adding cognitive remediation and work-focused social skills training (IPS with enhancements [IPSE]).
To investigate the effects of IPS vs IPSE vs service as usual (SAU) on a population of individuals with severe mental illness in Denmark.
DESIGN, SETTING, AND PARTICIPANTS: This was an investigator-initiated, 3-group, parallel, assessor-blinded randomized clinical trial that used early-intervention teams or community mental health services in 3 Danish cities to recruit participants with severe mental illness. Participants were randomly assigned to receive IPS, IPSE, or SAU from November 2012 to February 2016, and follow-up continued until August 2017.
Participants allocated to the IPS intervention received vocational support per the principles of the IPS model. Participants in the IPSE arm received cognitive remediation and social skills training in addition to IPS. The group receiving SAU received vocational rehabilitation at the Danish job centers.
The primary outcome was the number of hours in competitive employment or education during the 18-month follow-up. Secondary outcomes included intergroup differences in employment or education at any point during follow-up; time to employment or education; and cognitive and social functioning, self-esteem, and self-efficacy.
Of the 720 included participants (mean [SD] age, 32.8 [9.9] years; 276 [38.3%] women), 243 received IPS, 238 received IPSE, and 239 received SAU. Most participants (551 [76.5%]) were diagnosed with a schizophrenia spectrum disorder. During the 18-month follow-up, the IPSE group worked or studied a mean (SD) of 488.1 (735.6) hours, compared with 340.8 (573.8) hours in the group receiving SAU (success-rate difference [SRD], 0.151 [95% CI, 0.01-0.295]; P = .016). The mean (SD) in the IPS group was 411 (656.9) (SRD, 0.127 [95% CI, -0.017 to 0.276]; P = .004). There was no difference between IPS and IPSE in any vocational outcomes, and the 3 groups showed no differences in any nonvocational outcomes, except that the IPS and IPSE groups were more satisfied with the services received than the group receiving SAU (IPS vs SAU: SRD, 0.310 [95% CI, 0.167-0.445]); IPSE vs SAU: SRD, 0.341 [95% CI, 0.187-0.478]).
Compared with SAU, IPS and IPSE seem to be viable routes to increase employment and education rates in people with severe mental illness in Denmark, but no additional effects were observed by enhancing IPS.
ClinicalTrials.gov identifier: NCT01722344.
个体安置和支持(IPS)似乎是一种针对严重精神疾病患者的有效职业干预措施,但在丹麦的福利模式中,其效果尚未得到证实。此外,通过添加认知矫正和以工作为重点的社交技能培训(增强型 IPS [IPSE]),效果可能会增强。
调查 IPS 与 IPSE 与常规服务(SAU)对丹麦严重精神疾病人群的影响。
设计、地点和参与者:这是一项由研究者发起的、3 组、平行、评估者盲法的随机临床试验,使用丹麦 3 个城市的早期干预团队或社区心理健康服务招募患有严重精神疾病的患者。参与者被随机分配接受 IPS、IPSE 或 SAU,从 2012 年 11 月至 2016 年 2 月,随访持续至 2017 年 8 月。
分配到 IPS 干预组的参与者根据 IPS 模型的原则接受职业支持。IPSE 组除了 IPS 之外还接受认知矫正和社交技能培训。接受 SAU 的组在丹麦就业中心接受职业康复。
主要结局是在 18 个月随访期间竞争性就业或教育的小时数。次要结局包括在随访期间任何时间的就业或教育的组间差异;就业或教育的时间;以及认知和社交功能、自尊和自我效能。
在 720 名纳入的参与者中(平均[SD]年龄,32.8[9.9]岁;276[38.3%]名女性),243 名接受 IPS,238 名接受 IPSE,239 名接受 SAU。大多数参与者(551[76.5%])被诊断为精神分裂症谱系障碍。在 18 个月的随访期间,IPSE 组工作或学习的平均(SD)时间为 488.1(735.6)小时,而接受 SAU 的组为 340.8(573.8)小时(成功率差异[SRD],0.151[95%CI,0.01-0.295];P=0.016)。IPS 组的平均值(SD)为 411(656.9)(SRD,0.127[95%CI,-0.017 至 0.276];P=0.004)。在任何职业结果方面,IPS 和 IPSE 之间没有差异,并且 3 组在任何非职业结果方面均无差异,除了 IPS 和 IPSE 组对所接受的服务比接受 SAU 的组更满意(IPS 与 SAU:SRD,0.310[95%CI,0.167-0.445]);IPSE 与 SAU:SRD,0.341[95%CI,0.187-0.478])。
与 SAU 相比,IPS 和 IPSE 似乎是增加丹麦严重精神疾病患者就业和教育率的可行途径,但通过增强 IPS 并未观察到额外的效果。
ClinicalTrials.gov 标识符:NCT01722344。