Hellström Lone, Bech Per, Hjorthøj Carsten, Nordentoft Merete, Lindschou Jane, Eplov Lene Falgaard
Copenhagen University Hospital, Mental Health Center Copenhagen, Hellerup, Denmark.
Psychiatric Research Unit, Mental Health Centre North Zealand, University of Copenhagen, Hellerup, Denmark.
Occup Environ Med. 2017 Oct;74(10):717-725. doi: 10.1136/oemed-2016-104248. Epub 2017 May 25.
The effect of Individual Placement and Support (IPS) on return to work or education among people with mood or anxiety disorders is unclear, while IPS increases return to work for people with severe mental illness. We examined the effect of IPS modified for people with mood and anxiety disorders (IPS-MA) on return to work and education compared with services as usual (SAU).
In a randomised clinical superiority trial, 326 participants with mood and anxiety disorders were centrally randomised to IPS-MA, consisting of individual mentor support and career counselling (n=162) or SAU (n=164). The primary outcome was competitive employment or education at 24 months, while weeks of competitive employment or education, illness symptoms and level of functioning, and well-being were secondary outcomes.
After 24 months, 44.4% (72/162) of the participants receiving IPS-MA had returned to work or education compared with 37.8% (62/164) following SAU (OR=1.34, 95% CI: 0.86 to 2.10, p=0.20). We found no difference in mean number of weeks in employment or education (IPS-MA 32.4 weeks vs SAU 26.7 weeks, p=0.14), level of depression (Hamilton Depression 6-Item Scale score IPS-MA 5.7 points vs SAU 5.0 points, p=0.12), level of anxiety (Hamilton Anxiety 6-Item Scale score IPS-MA 5.8 points vs SAU 5.1 points, p=0.17), level of functioning (Global Assessment of Functioning IPS-MA 59.1 points vs SAU 59.5 points, p=0.81) or well-being measured by WHO-Five Well-being Index (IPS-MA 49.6 points vs SAU 48.5 points, p=0.83) at 24 months.
The modified version of IPS, IPS-MA, was not superior to SAU in supporting people with mood or anxiety disorders in return to work at 24 months.
NCT01721824.
个人安置与支持(IPS)对患有情绪或焦虑障碍者重返工作岗位或接受教育的影响尚不清楚,而IPS可提高重症精神疾病患者的重返工作率。我们比较了针对情绪和焦虑障碍患者调整后的IPS(IPS-MA)与常规服务(SAU)对重返工作和接受教育的影响。
在一项随机临床优势试验中,326名患有情绪和焦虑障碍的参与者被集中随机分为IPS-MA组(包括个人导师支持和职业咨询,n = 162)或SAU组(n = 164)。主要结局是24个月时的竞争性就业或接受教育情况,而竞争性就业或接受教育的周数、疾病症状和功能水平以及幸福感为次要结局。
24个月后,接受IPS-MA的参与者中有44.4%(72/162)重返工作岗位或接受教育,而接受SAU的参与者中这一比例为37.8%(62/164)(比值比=1.34,95%置信区间:0.86至2.10,p = 0.20)。我们发现,在就业或接受教育的平均周数(IPS-MA组为32.4周,SAU组为26.7周,p = 0.14)、抑郁水平(汉密尔顿抑郁6项量表评分IPS-MA组为5.7分,SAU组为5.0分,p = 0.12)、焦虑水平(汉密尔顿焦虑6项量表评分IPS-MA组为5.8分,SAU组为5.1分,p = 0.17)、功能水平(总体功能评估IPS-MA组为59.1分,SAU组为59.5分,p = 0.81)或通过世界卫生组织五福指数测量的幸福感(IPS-MA组为49.6分,SAU组为48.5分,p = 0.83)方面,24个月时两组之间没有差异。
在支持患有情绪或焦虑障碍的人在24个月内重返工作岗位方面,改良版的IPS即IPS-MA并不优于SAU。
NCT01721824。