Troppmair J, Nachbaur K, Herold M, Aulitzky W, Tilg H, Gastl G, Bieling P, Kotlan B, Flener R, Mull B
Department of Internal Medicine, University Hospital, Innsbruck, Austria.
Clin Exp Immunol. 1988 Dec;74(3):392-7.
Recently we presented evidence that cellular immune responses are associated with increased in-vitro and in-vivo excretion of neopterin (Huber et al., 1983) and that, in vitro at least, macrophages and IFN-gamma play a key role in the induction of this phenomenon (Huber et al., 1984). Although this marker is increasingly applied for monitoring of human disease, there is limited knowledge about the mechanism(s) responsible for its increased biosynthesis during inflammatory states. To further elucidate this question we evaluated neopterin and IFN-levels in culture supernatants of human blood cells and in patients' sera. Cells or patients were exposed to a panel of recombinant cytokines, alloantigens or lipopolysaccharide. To investigate indirect stimulation by induction of production of endogenous IFNs, the impact of neutralization of IFNs by addition of specific antibodies was also studied. The data confirm our previous results which identified the monocyte/macrophage as the main producer cell among human blood cells. They further demonstrate that, at least in vitro, IFN-gamma, IFN-alpha and LPS can all stimulate neopterin release independently from each other. Thirdly, they indicate that stimuli such as alloantigens or TNF-alpha can indirectly enhance neopterin release by their capacity to induce production of endogenous IFN-gamma. On the basis of these data we conclude that enhanced neopterin biosynthesis does not necessarily relate to activation of T cells but can also be caused by non-immune stimuli.
最近我们提供了证据,证明细胞免疫反应与新蝶呤在体外和体内排泄增加有关(胡贝尔等人,1983年),并且至少在体外,巨噬细胞和干扰素-γ在这种现象的诱导中起关键作用(胡贝尔等人,1984年)。尽管该标志物越来越多地用于监测人类疾病,但对于炎症状态下其生物合成增加的机制了解有限。为了进一步阐明这个问题,我们评估了人血细胞培养上清液和患者血清中的新蝶呤和干扰素水平。细胞或患者暴露于一组重组细胞因子、同种异体抗原或脂多糖。为了研究通过诱导内源性干扰素产生的间接刺激,还研究了添加特异性抗体中和干扰素的影响。数据证实了我们之前的结果,即确定单核细胞/巨噬细胞是人类血细胞中的主要产生细胞。它们进一步证明,至少在体外,干扰素-γ、干扰素-α和脂多糖都可以相互独立地刺激新蝶呤释放。第三,它们表明同种异体抗原或肿瘤坏死因子-α等刺激物可以通过诱导内源性干扰素-γ产生的能力间接增强新蝶呤释放。基于这些数据,我们得出结论,新蝶呤生物合成增强不一定与T细胞活化有关,也可能由非免疫刺激引起。