Center for Species Survival, Smithsonian Conservation Biology Institute, Front Royal, Virginia, United States of America.
Department of Animal Science, North Carolina State University, Raleigh, North Carolina, United States of America.
PLoS One. 2019 Sep 4;14(9):e0217326. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0217326. eCollection 2019.
A recent large-scale welfare study in North America involving 106 Asian (Elephas maximus) and 131 African (Loxodonta africana) elephants at 64 accredited facilities identified links (i.e., risk factors) between zoo environmental factors and a number of welfare outcomes (stereotypic behavior, ovarian acyclicity, hyperprolactinemia, walking and recumbence, body condition, health status, serum cortisol). For this population of elephants, we used the same epidemiological methods to examine associations between those risk factors and two additional welfare outcomes, mean concentration and individual variability (CV) of fecal glucocorticoid metabolite concentrations (FGM) as indicators of stress. Results indicate that African elephants are more responsive to social stressors than Asians, and that poor joint health is a stress-related welfare problem for Asian, but not African elephants in the North American population. For both species, higher FGM concentrations were associated with zoos located at more northern latitudes, whereas lower FGM concentrations were associated with having free access to indoor/outdoor spaces, and spending more time in managed interactions with staff. Also important for captive management, elephants having diverse enrichment options and belonging to compatible social groups exhibited reduced intra-individual variability in FGM concentrations. Our findings show that aspects of the zoo environment can be potential sources of stress for captive elephants, and that there are management activities that may facilitate coping with zoo conditions. Given species differences in factors that affected FGM, targeted, species-specific management approaches likely are needed to ensure good welfare for all elephants.
最近在北美进行的一项大规模福利研究涉及 64 家认证机构的 106 头亚洲象(Elephas maximus)和 131 头非洲象(Loxodonta africana),该研究确定了动物园环境因素与一些福利结果(刻板行为、卵巢无排卵、高催乳素血症、行走和卧姿、身体状况、健康状况、血清皮质醇)之间的联系(即风险因素)。对于这群大象,我们使用相同的流行病学方法来研究这些风险因素与另外两个福利结果之间的关系,即粪便皮质醇代谢物浓度(FGM)的平均浓度和个体变异性(CV),作为压力的指标。结果表明,非洲象比亚洲象对社会压力更敏感,而关节健康状况不佳是北美象群中亚洲象的一个与压力相关的福利问题。对于这两个物种,FGM 浓度较高与位于较北纬度的动物园有关,而 FGM 浓度较低与有机会自由进入室内/室外空间以及与工作人员进行更多管理互动有关。对于圈养管理也很重要的是,拥有多样化的丰富选择和属于相容社会群体的大象,其 FGM 浓度的个体内变异性降低。我们的研究结果表明,动物园环境的某些方面可能是圈养大象的压力源,并且存在一些管理活动可能有助于应对动物园的条件。鉴于影响 FGM 的因素在物种间存在差异,可能需要针对特定物种的管理方法来确保所有大象的福利。