• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

动物园动物福利评估:迈向最佳生活质量

Assessment of Welfare in Zoo Animals: Towards Optimum Quality of Life.

作者信息

Wolfensohn Sarah, Shotton Justine, Bowley Hannah, Davies Siân, Thompson Sarah, Justice William S M

机构信息

School of Veterinary Medicine, University of Surrey, Guildford, Surrey GU2 7AL, UK.

Marwell Wildlife, Colden Common, Winchester, Hampshire SO21 1JH, UK.

出版信息

Animals (Basel). 2018 Jul 4;8(7):110. doi: 10.3390/ani8070110.

DOI:10.3390/ani8070110
PMID:29973560
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC6071229/
Abstract

Zoos are required to maintain a high standard of animal welfare, and this can be assessed using a combination of resource-based and animal-based indices usually divided into behavioural indicators, physiological indicators and clinical/pathological signs. Modern animal welfare assessments should aim to encompass positive affective states and the indicators that are useful in assessing these are discussed. When developing factors to be scored for each species, there is huge variability in the available information about the natural biology for some zoo species and even less information concerning those animals in captivity. Wild baselines are not always the most accurate indicator of what is right for an animal in captivity, which makes the identification of factors to include within species-specific welfare assessment even more challenging. When planning a welfare strategy for any species, it is important that the full range of their biological requirements and needs are considered, but this can be challenging for some zoo species and it is not possible to define a “one size fits all” welfare strategy. The different approaches for welfare assessment are reviewed, including the development of the Animal Welfare Assessment Grid which offers an evidence-based tool for continual welfare assessment, using technology where appropriate, to facilitate decision making and lead to improvements in the animals’ quality of life.

摘要

动物园需要维持高标准的动物福利,这可以通过结合基于资源和基于动物的指标来评估,这些指标通常分为行为指标、生理指标以及临床/病理体征。现代动物福利评估应旨在涵盖积极的情感状态,并讨论了用于评估这些状态的指标。在为每个物种制定评分因素时,对于一些动物园物种,有关其自然生物学的可用信息存在巨大差异,而对于圈养动物的信息则更少。野生基线并不总是圈养动物适宜状况的最准确指标,这使得确定特定物种福利评估中应包含的因素变得更具挑战性。在为任何物种规划福利策略时,考虑其所有生物需求很重要,但这对一些动物园物种来说可能具有挑战性,而且不可能定义一种“一刀切”的福利策略。本文回顾了福利评估的不同方法,包括动物福利评估网格的开发,该网格提供了一种基于证据的工具,用于持续的福利评估,在适当情况下使用技术,以促进决策制定并改善动物的生活质量。

相似文献

1
Assessment of Welfare in Zoo Animals: Towards Optimum Quality of Life.动物园动物福利评估:迈向最佳生活质量
Animals (Basel). 2018 Jul 4;8(7):110. doi: 10.3390/ani8070110.
2
Cognitive Bias in Zoo Animals: An Optimistic Outlook for Welfare Assessment.动物园动物的认知偏差:福利评估的乐观前景
Animals (Basel). 2018 Jun 27;8(7):104. doi: 10.3390/ani8070104.
3
Zoo Animal Welfare Assessment: Where Do We Stand?动物园动物福利评估:我们目前的状况如何?
Animals (Basel). 2023 Jun 12;13(12):1966. doi: 10.3390/ani13121966.
4
Forensic Use of the Five Domains Model for Assessing Suffering in Cases of Animal Cruelty.动物虐待案件中用于评估痛苦的五领域模型的法医学应用。
Animals (Basel). 2018 Jun 25;8(7):101. doi: 10.3390/ani8070101.
5
Welfare Assessment of Invertebrates: Adapting the Animal Welfare Assessment Grid (AWAG) for Zoo Decapods and Cephalopods.无脊椎动物的福利评估:将动物福利评估网格(AWAG)应用于动物园中的十足目动物和头足类动物。
Animals (Basel). 2022 Jun 29;12(13):1675. doi: 10.3390/ani12131675.
6
Animal Welfare Assessment in 16 Zoos in South Korea Using the Modified Animal Welfare Assessment Grid.使用改良动物福利评估量表对韩国16家动物园进行动物福利评估
Front Vet Sci. 2022 Apr 26;9:860741. doi: 10.3389/fvets.2022.860741. eCollection 2022.
7
Using Zoo Welfare Assessments to Identify Common Issues in Developing Country Zoos.利用动物园福利评估来识别发展中国家动物园的常见问题。
Animals (Basel). 2020 Nov 12;10(11):2101. doi: 10.3390/ani10112101.
8
Using Farm Animal Welfare Protocols as a Base to Assess the Welfare of Wild Animals in Captivity-Case Study: Dorcas Gazelles ().以农场动物福利协议为基础评估圈养野生动物的福利——案例研究:多卡瞪羚()
Animals (Basel). 2018 Jul 5;8(7):111. doi: 10.3390/ani8070111.
9
Adaptation of the animal welfare assessment grid (AWAG) for monitoring animal welfare in zoological collections.动物福利评估网格(AWAG)在动物园动物福利监测中的应用。
Vet Rec. 2017 Aug 5;181(6):143. doi: 10.1136/vr.104309. Epub 2017 May 9.
10
Ackonc-AWA: A multi-species animal welfare assessment protocol for wild animals under human care to overcome the use of generic welfare checklists.Ackonc-AWA:一种针对人类照料下野生动物的多物种动物福利评估方案,以克服通用福利检查表的使用问题。
Front Vet Sci. 2022 Dec 8;9:1033821. doi: 10.3389/fvets.2022.1033821. eCollection 2022.

引用本文的文献

1
Using the Welfare Quality® framework to develop a welfare assessment protocol for captive chimpanzees ().使用福利质量®框架为圈养黑猩猩制定福利评估方案()。
Anim Welf. 2025 Jul 29;34:e54. doi: 10.1017/awf.2025.10021. eCollection 2025.
2
Animal-Visitor Interactions in Zoos and Aquariums: A Systematic Review.动物园和水族馆中的动物与游客互动:一项系统综述。
Animals (Basel). 2025 Jun 29;15(13):1924. doi: 10.3390/ani15131924.
3
Validation of indicators for the welfare assessment of captive Yangtze finless porpoises ().圈养长江江豚福利评估指标的验证
Anim Welf. 2025 May 21;34:e31. doi: 10.1017/awf.2025.19. eCollection 2025.
4
Detection of avian, murine, bovine, shrew, and bat coronaviruses in wild mammals from Mexico.在来自墨西哥的野生哺乳动物中检测禽、鼠、牛、鼩鼱和蝙蝠冠状病毒。
Virol J. 2025 Apr 26;22(1):122. doi: 10.1186/s12985-025-02724-8.
5
Developing an Ostrich Welfare Assessment Protocol (OWAP) in Intensive and Semi-Intensive Systems.制定集约化和半集约化系统中的鸵鸟福利评估方案(OWAP)。
Vet Sci. 2025 Apr 18;12(4):380. doi: 10.3390/vetsci12040380.
6
Effect of Carcass Feeds on Feeding Behavior and Social Interactions in Zoo-Based African Wild Dogs (Lycaon pictus).胴体饲料对圈养非洲野犬(非洲野犬属 非洲野犬种)取食行为及社会互动的影响
Zoo Biol. 2025 Jul-Aug;44(4):313-323. doi: 10.1002/zoo.21895. Epub 2025 Mar 12.
7
The 'Sanctuary Gap': Reviewing the Research on Captive Wildlife Sanctuary Tourism.“庇护所差距”:审视圈养野生动物庇护所旅游的研究
Animals (Basel). 2025 Feb 10;15(4):496. doi: 10.3390/ani15040496.
8
Investigating the Welfare of Zoo-Housed Cryptoprocta ferox: Behavioral Observations and Hormonal Profiling.圈养马岛缟狸福利状况调查:行为观察与激素分析
Zoo Biol. 2025 Mar-Apr;44(2):178-188. doi: 10.1002/zoo.21884. Epub 2024 Dec 19.
9
Simplifying the Animal Welfare Assessment Grid for enhanced accessibility.简化动物福利评估网格以提高可及性。
Front Vet Sci. 2024 Nov 19;11:1459560. doi: 10.3389/fvets.2024.1459560. eCollection 2024.
10
Development of a welfare assessment tool for tourist camp elephants in Asia.亚洲旅游营象福利评估工具的开发。
PeerJ. 2024 Oct 28;12:e18370. doi: 10.7717/peerj.18370. eCollection 2024.

本文引用的文献

1
Cognitive judgement bias is associated with frequency of anticipatory behavior in bottlenose dolphins.认知判断偏差与宽吻海豚预期行为的频率相关。
Zoo Biol. 2018 Mar;37(2):67-73. doi: 10.1002/zoo.21400. Epub 2018 Jan 31.
2
Play and optimal welfare: Does play indicate the presence of positive affective states?玩耍与最佳福利:玩耍是否表明存在积极情感状态?
Behav Processes. 2018 Nov;156:3-15. doi: 10.1016/j.beproc.2017.11.011. Epub 2017 Nov 16.
3
The 24/7 approach to promoting optimal welfare for captive wild animals.全天候促进圈养野生动物最佳福利的方法。
Behav Processes. 2018 Nov;156:83-95. doi: 10.1016/j.beproc.2017.09.010. Epub 2017 Nov 4.
4
Operational Details of the Five Domains Model and Its Key Applications to the Assessment and Management of Animal Welfare.五领域模型的操作细节及其在动物福利评估与管理中的关键应用
Animals (Basel). 2017 Aug 9;7(8):60. doi: 10.3390/ani7080060.
5
Adaptation of the animal welfare assessment grid (AWAG) for monitoring animal welfare in zoological collections.动物福利评估网格(AWAG)在动物园动物福利监测中的应用。
Vet Rec. 2017 Aug 5;181(6):143. doi: 10.1136/vr.104309. Epub 2017 May 9.
6
Bottlenose dolphins engaging in more social affiliative behaviour judge ambiguous cues more optimistically.参与更多社交亲和行为的宽吻海豚对模糊线索的判断更为乐观。
Behav Brain Res. 2017 Mar 30;322(Pt A):115-122. doi: 10.1016/j.bbr.2017.01.026. Epub 2017 Jan 18.
7
Aggressive behavior and hair cortisol levels in captive Dorcas gazelles (Gazella dorcas) as animal-based welfare indicators.圈养小鹿瞪羚(Gazella dorcas)的攻击行为和毛发皮质醇水平作为基于动物的福利指标
Zoo Biol. 2016 Nov;35(6):467-473. doi: 10.1002/zoo.21323. Epub 2016 Sep 13.
8
Making Decisions under Ambiguity: Judgment Bias Tasks for Assessing Emotional State in Animals.在模糊性下做决策:用于评估动物情绪状态的判断偏差任务
Front Behav Neurosci. 2016 Jun 9;10:119. doi: 10.3389/fnbeh.2016.00119. eCollection 2016.
9
Cumulative stress in research animals: Telomere attrition as a biomarker in a welfare context?实验动物的累积应激:在福利背景下,端粒损耗作为一种生物标志物?
Bioessays. 2016 Feb;38(2):201-12. doi: 10.1002/bies.201500127. Epub 2015 Dec 8.
10
A Universal Animal Welfare Framework for Zoos.一个适用于动物园的通用动物福利框架。
J Appl Anim Welf Sci. 2015;18 Suppl 1(sup1):S1-10. doi: 10.1080/10888705.2015.1075830.