• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

直肠疾病的门诊管理。局部麻醉采用哪些技术?单中心经验。

Outpatient management of proctologic disease. Which techniques for local anesthesia? The experience of a single center.

作者信息

Falco N, Tutino R, Fontana T, Gullo R, Licari L, Raspanti C, De Marco P, Colli F, Venturelli P, Salamone G, Cocorullo G

出版信息

G Chir. 2019 May-Jun;40(3):182-187.

PMID:31484006
Abstract

INTRODUCTION

Since 1899 outpatient management of surgical patients had been increasing, becoming the best option when possible. In 1988 was described the first experience of outpatient management of proctologic disease. Advances in local anesthesia techniques have improved the outpatient approach to surgical disease, particularly in patients with proctological diseases.

METHODS

From 2010 to 2016, 1160 patients who needed surgery for proctologic disease have been recruited: 239 hemorrhoidectomies using the variant of Milligan Morgan technique described by Phillips, 45 trans-anal hemorrhoidal DE-arterialization (THD), 315 sphincterotomies, 12 anal polypectomies, 230 loop seton positions, 65 cone-like fistulectomies and 254 fistulotomies for perianal fistulas. In 329 cases, we used the posterior perineal block, 603 local perineal blocks, and 228 tumescent anesthesia.

RESULTS

On a total of 1160 procedure failure rate was of 4.7% (55 cases). Urinary retention (69% 38 cases); bleeding 18% (10 cases), uncontrolled pain 12% of cases (7 cases). The chi-square test demonstrates (p<0.01) that the failure rate of the three types of anesthesia is very different with high statistical significance. The failure rate in patient underwent Posterior Perineal Block was 27/329 cases (8.2%), 8/228 (3.5%) in patients who underwent Tumescent Anesthesia and 20/603 (3.3%) in who underwent Local Perineal Block.

CONCLUSIONS

Outpatient protocols represent the most common approach to minor proctologic disease that needs a good local block, with a good analgesic and sedative assistance, the different local block seems to be the same concerning the pain control, but presents some little, not relevant difference concerning urinary retention rate.

摘要

引言

自1899年以来,外科患者的门诊管理一直在增加,在可能的情况下成为最佳选择。1988年描述了直肠疾病门诊管理的首次经验。局部麻醉技术的进步改善了外科疾病的门诊治疗方法,特别是在直肠疾病患者中。

方法

2010年至2016年,招募了1160例需要进行直肠疾病手术的患者:采用菲利普斯描述的米利根·摩根技术变体进行239例痔切除术,45例经肛门痔去动脉化(THD),315例括约肌切开术,12例肛门息肉切除术,230例套扎术,65例锥形肛瘘切除术和254例肛周肛瘘瘘管切开术。在329例病例中,我们使用了后会阴阻滞,603例局部会阴阻滞和228例肿胀麻醉。

结果

在总共1160例手术中,失败率为4.7%(55例)。尿潴留(69%,38例);出血18%(10例),疼痛控制不佳12%(7例)。卡方检验表明(p<0.01),三种麻醉类型的失败率差异很大,具有很高的统计学意义。接受后会阴阻滞的患者失败率为27/329例(8.2%),接受肿胀麻醉的患者为8/228例(3.5%),接受局部会阴阻滞的患者为20/603例(3.3%)。

结论

门诊治疗方案是治疗需要良好局部阻滞的轻度直肠疾病最常用的方法,辅以良好的镇痛和镇静辅助,不同的局部阻滞在疼痛控制方面似乎相同,但在尿潴留率方面存在一些微小的、不相关的差异。

相似文献

1
Outpatient management of proctologic disease. Which techniques for local anesthesia? The experience of a single center.直肠疾病的门诊管理。局部麻醉采用哪些技术?单中心经验。
G Chir. 2019 May-Jun;40(3):182-187.
2
[Tumescent local anesthesia in proctologic surgery].[直肠外科手术中的肿胀局部麻醉]
Chirurg. 2003 Sep;74(9):839-43. doi: 10.1007/s00104-003-0670-2.
3
Local posterior perianal block for proctologic surgery.
Int Surg. 2006 Nov-Dec;91(6):348-51.
4
[Ambulatory proctologic surgery].
Ther Umsch. 1992 Jul;49(7):489-92.
5
Evidence based switch to perianal block for ano-rectal surgeries.循证切换至肛门直肠手术的肛周阻滞。
Int J Surg. 2010;8(1):29-31. doi: 10.1016/j.ijsu.2009.09.013. Epub 2009 Oct 1.
6
Anorectal manometry assessment of sphincter relaxation after local-regional anesthesia with posterior perineal block.
Ann Ital Chir. 2019;90:580-582.
7
Transanal hemorrhoid dearterialization is a safe and effective outpatient procedure for the treatment of hemorrhoidal disease.经肛门痔动脉结扎术是一种治疗痔病的安全有效的门诊手术。
Cir Esp. 2016 Dec;94(10):588-594. doi: 10.1016/j.ciresp.2016.07.002. Epub 2016 Oct 20.
8
Local perianal nerve block versus spinal block for closed hemorrhoidectomy: a ramdomized controlled trial.局部肛周神经阻滞与脊髓阻滞用于闭合性痔切除术的随机对照试验
J Med Assoc Thai. 2008 Dec;91(12):1862-6.
9
Distal Doppler-guided transanal hemorrhoidal dearterialization with mucopexy versus conventional hemorrhoidectomy for grade III and IV hemorrhoids: postoperative morbidity and long-term outcomes.经肛门多普勒引导痔动脉结扎术联合黏膜固定术与传统痔切除术治疗 III、IV 度痔:术后并发症和长期疗效比较。
Tech Coloproctol. 2017 May;21(5):337-344. doi: 10.1007/s10151-017-1620-1. Epub 2017 Apr 27.
10
Simple harmonic scalpel hemorrhoidectomy utilizing local anesthesia combined with intravenous sedation: a safe and rapid alternative to conventional hemorrhoidectomy.采用局部麻醉联合静脉镇静的简易谐波手术刀痔切除术:一种安全快速的传统痔切除术替代方法。
Int J Colorectal Dis. 2007 Jul;22(7):801-6. doi: 10.1007/s00384-006-0242-2. Epub 2006 Nov 22.

引用本文的文献

1
Comparison of Pudendal Nerve Block and Spinal Anesthesia in Proctological Surgeries: Efficacy, Safety, and Patient Outcomes.阴部神经阻滞与椎管内麻醉在肛肠外科手术中的效果比较:疗效、安全性和患者结局。
Medicina (Kaunas). 2024 Oct 9;60(10):1651. doi: 10.3390/medicina60101651.
2
Fissurectomy versus lateral internal sphincterotomy in the treatment of chronic anal fissures: no advantages in terms of post-operative incontinence.肛裂切除术与侧方内括约肌切开术治疗慢性肛裂:术后失禁方面无优势。
Tech Coloproctol. 2023 Oct;27(10):885-889. doi: 10.1007/s10151-023-02780-8. Epub 2023 Mar 16.