• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

急诊科儿童过敏反应疾病编码的漏报情况。

Missed Registration of Disease Codes for Pediatric Anaphylaxis at the Emergency Department.

作者信息

Choi Byungho, Kim Sun Hyu, Lee Hyeji

机构信息

Department of Emergency Medicine, Ulsan University Hospital, University of Ulsan College of Medicine, 877 Bangeojinsunhwando-ro, Dong-gu, Ulsan 44033, Republic of Korea.

出版信息

Emerg Med Int. 2019 Aug 14;2019:4198630. doi: 10.1155/2019/4198630. eCollection 2019.

DOI:10.1155/2019/4198630
PMID:31485351
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC6710778/
Abstract

BACKGROUND

It is important to register anaphylaxis codes correctly to study the exact prevalence of anaphylaxis. The purpose of this study was to analyze the clinical characteristics and disease codes of inaccurately registered groups in pediatric anaphylaxis patients.

METHODS

This study reviewed the medical records of all pediatric patients who presented to the university hospital emergency department over a 5-year period. Study subjects were divided into 2 groups: the accurate group, including those registered under anaphylaxis codes, and the inaccurate coding group, including those registered under other codes.

RESULTS

From a total of 79,676 pediatric patients, 184 (0.23%) had anaphylaxis. Of these, 23 (12.5%) and 161 (87.5%) patients were classified to the accurate and inaccurate coding groups, respectively. Average age, time from symptom onset to emergency department presentation, past history of allergy, and penicillin and cephalosporin as causes of anaphylaxis differed between the 2 groups. Cardiovascular (39.1% vs. 5.6%, =0.001) and respiratory symptoms (65.2% vs. 42.2%, =0.038) manifested more frequently in the accurate group, while gastrointestinal symptoms (68.3% vs. 26.1%, =0.001) were more frequently observed in the inaccurate coding group. Fluid administration (82.6% vs. 28.0%, =0.001), steroid use (60.9% vs. 23.0%, =0.001), and epinephrine use (65.2% vs. 13.0% =0.001) were more common treatments for anaphylaxis in the emergency department in the accurate group. Anaphylaxis patients with cardiovascular symptoms, steroid use, and epinephrine use were more likely to be accurately registered with anaphylaxis disease codes.

CONCLUSIONS

In the case of pediatric anaphylaxis, more patients were registered inaccurately under other allergy-related codes and simple symptom codes, rather than under anaphylaxis codes. Therefore, future research on anaphylaxis should consider inaccurately registered anaphylactic patients, as shown in this study.

摘要

背景

正确登记过敏反应编码对于研究过敏反应的确切患病率很重要。本研究的目的是分析儿科过敏反应患者中编码不准确组的临床特征和疾病编码。

方法

本研究回顾了5年间在大学医院急诊科就诊的所有儿科患者的病历。研究对象分为2组:准确组,包括那些按照过敏反应编码登记的患者;编码不准确组,包括那些按照其他编码登记的患者。

结果

在总共79676名儿科患者中,184名(0.23%)发生了过敏反应。其中,分别有23名(12.5%)和161名(87.5%)患者被归类到准确编码组和编码不准确组。两组在平均年龄、从症状出现到急诊科就诊的时间、过敏史以及作为过敏反应原因的青霉素和头孢菌素方面存在差异。心血管症状(39.1%对5.6%,P=0.001)和呼吸道症状(65.2%对42.2%,P=0.038)在准确组中更频繁出现,而胃肠道症状(68.3%对26.1%,P=0.001)在编码不准确组中更常被观察到。在急诊科,准确组中输液(82.6%对28.0%,P=0.001)、使用类固醇(60.9%对23.0%,P=0.001)和使用肾上腺素(65.2%对13.0%,P=0.001)是更常见的过敏反应治疗方法。有心血管症状、使用类固醇和使用肾上腺素的过敏反应患者更有可能被准确登记为过敏反应疾病编码。

结论

在儿科过敏反应病例中,更多患者是按照其他与过敏相关的编码和简单症状编码登记不准确,而非按照过敏反应编码登记。因此,如本研究所示,未来关于过敏反应的研究应考虑编码不准确的过敏反应患者。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/40fe/6710778/204e3234bd65/EMI2019-4198630.001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/40fe/6710778/204e3234bd65/EMI2019-4198630.001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/40fe/6710778/204e3234bd65/EMI2019-4198630.001.jpg

相似文献

1
Missed Registration of Disease Codes for Pediatric Anaphylaxis at the Emergency Department.急诊科儿童过敏反应疾病编码的漏报情况。
Emerg Med Int. 2019 Aug 14;2019:4198630. doi: 10.1155/2019/4198630. eCollection 2019.
2
Are Registration of Disease Codes for Adult Anaphylaxis Accurate in the Emergency Department?成人过敏反应疾病编码在急诊科的登记准确吗?
Allergy Asthma Immunol Res. 2018 Mar;10(2):137-143. doi: 10.4168/aair.2018.10.2.137.
3
Missed Diagnosis of Anaphylaxis in Patients With Pediatric Urticaria in the Emergency Department.急诊儿童荨麻疹患者中过敏反应的漏诊。
Pediatr Emerg Care. 2021 Apr 1;37(4):199-203. doi: 10.1097/PEC.0000000000001617.
4
Use of epinephrine in emergency department depends on anaphylaxis severity in children.肾上腺素在急诊科的使用取决于儿童过敏反应的严重程度。
Eur J Pediatr. 2019 Jan;178(1):69-75. doi: 10.1007/s00431-018-3246-3. Epub 2018 Sep 29.
5
Evaluation of Anaphylaxis Management in a Pediatric Emergency Department.儿科急诊科过敏反应管理的评估
Pediatr Emerg Care. 2016 Aug;32(8):508-13. doi: 10.1097/PEC.0000000000000864.
6
Anaphylaxis in an emergency care setting: a one year prospective study in children and adults.急诊环境中的过敏反应:儿童和成人的一年前瞻性研究。
Scand J Trauma Resusc Emerg Med. 2017 Nov 22;25(1):111. doi: 10.1186/s13049-017-0402-0.
7
Emergency department visits for food allergy in Taiwan: a retrospective study.台湾地区因食物过敏而前往急诊科就诊的情况:一项回顾性研究。
Pediatr Neonatol. 2014 Aug;55(4):275-81. doi: 10.1016/j.pedneo.2013.11.006. Epub 2014 Mar 17.
8
Improving anaphylaxis management in a pediatric emergency department.改善儿科急诊的过敏反应管理。
Pediatr Allergy Immunol. 2011 Nov;22(7):708-14. doi: 10.1111/j.1399-3038.2011.01181.x. Epub 2011 Jun 15.
9
The Timely Administration of Epinephrine and Related Factors in Children with Anaphylaxis.儿童过敏反应中肾上腺素的及时使用及相关因素
J Clin Med. 2022 Sep 20;11(19):5494. doi: 10.3390/jcm11195494.
10
Underuse of Epinephrine for Pediatric Anaphylaxis Victims in the Emergency Department: A Population-based Study.急诊科儿科过敏反应患者肾上腺素使用不足:一项基于人群的研究。
Allergy Asthma Immunol Res. 2019 Jul;11(4):529-537. doi: 10.4168/aair.2019.11.4.529.

引用本文的文献

1
Development of a machine learning algorithm based on administrative claims data for identification of ED anaphylaxis patient visits.基于行政索赔数据开发用于识别急诊科过敏反应患者就诊情况的机器学习算法。
J Allergy Clin Immunol Glob. 2022 Oct 17;2(1):61-68. doi: 10.1016/j.jacig.2022.09.002. eCollection 2023 Feb.
2
Characteristics of anaphylaxis patients who visited emergency departments in Korea: Results from a national emergency department information system.韩国急诊就诊的过敏反应患者的特征:国家急诊信息系统的研究结果。
PLoS One. 2022 Apr 29;17(4):e0266712. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0266712. eCollection 2022.

本文引用的文献

1
Missed Diagnosis of Anaphylaxis in Patients With Pediatric Urticaria in the Emergency Department.急诊儿童荨麻疹患者中过敏反应的漏诊。
Pediatr Emerg Care. 2021 Apr 1;37(4):199-203. doi: 10.1097/PEC.0000000000001617.
2
Downstream consequences of diagnostic error in pediatric anaphylaxis.小儿过敏反应诊断错误的下游后果。
BMC Pediatr. 2018 Feb 7;18(1):40. doi: 10.1186/s12887-018-1024-z.
3
Are Registration of Disease Codes for Adult Anaphylaxis Accurate in the Emergency Department?成人过敏反应疾病编码在急诊科的登记准确吗?
Allergy Asthma Immunol Res. 2018 Mar;10(2):137-143. doi: 10.4168/aair.2018.10.2.137.
4
Inaccurate diagnosis of paediatric anaphylaxis in three Australian Emergency Departments.澳大利亚三个急诊科对儿童过敏反应的误诊情况。
J Paediatr Child Health. 2017 Jul;53(7):698-704. doi: 10.1111/jpc.13483. Epub 2017 Feb 3.
5
Pediatric anaphylaxis: triggers, clinical features, and treatment in a tertiary-care hospital.儿科过敏反应:三级医疗医院中的触发因素、临床特征及治疗
Asian Pac J Allergy Immunol. 2015 Dec;33(4):281-8. doi: 10.12932/AP0610.33.4.2015.
6
Epidemiology and clinical predictors of biphasic reactions in children with anaphylaxis.过敏反应儿童双相反应的流行病学及临床预测因素
Ann Allergy Asthma Immunol. 2015 Sep;115(3):217-223.e2. doi: 10.1016/j.anai.2015.05.013. Epub 2015 Jun 22.
7
Trends in hospitalizations for food-induced anaphylaxis in US children, 2000-2009.2000 - 2009年美国儿童食物诱发过敏反应的住院趋势。
J Allergy Clin Immunol. 2014 Oct;134(4):960-2.e3. doi: 10.1016/j.jaci.2014.06.018. Epub 2014 Aug 7.
8
Anaphylaxis in America: the prevalence and characteristics of anaphylaxis in the United States.美国的过敏反应:美国过敏反应的流行率和特征。
J Allergy Clin Immunol. 2014 Feb;133(2):461-7. doi: 10.1016/j.jaci.2013.08.016. Epub 2013 Oct 18.
9
The epidemiology of anaphylaxis in Europe: a systematic review.欧洲过敏反应的流行病学:系统评价。
Allergy. 2013 Nov;68(11):1353-61. doi: 10.1111/all.12272. Epub 2013 Oct 14.
10
Update in pediatric anaphylaxis: a systematic review.儿童过敏反应的最新进展:一项系统综述
Clin Pediatr (Phila). 2013 May;52(5):451-61. doi: 10.1177/0009922812474683. Epub 2013 Feb 7.