• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

小儿过敏反应诊断错误的下游后果。

Downstream consequences of diagnostic error in pediatric anaphylaxis.

作者信息

Thomson H, Seith R, Craig S

机构信息

School of Clinical Sciences at Monash Health, Monash University, Clayton, Australia.

Paediatric Emergency Department, Monash Children's Hospital, Clayton, Australia.

出版信息

BMC Pediatr. 2018 Feb 7;18(1):40. doi: 10.1186/s12887-018-1024-z.

DOI:10.1186/s12887-018-1024-z
PMID:29415679
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC5803891/
Abstract

BACKGROUND

Pediatric anaphylaxis is commonly misdiagnosed in the Emergency Department (ED). We aimed to determine the impact of inaccurate diagnosis on the management and follow-up of pediatric anaphylaxis presenting to the ED.

METHODS

Retrospective chart review of ED management of children aged 0-18 years with allergic presentations to three EDs in Melbourne, Australia in 2014. Cases were included if an ED diagnosis of anaphylaxis was recorded, or the presentation met international consensus criteria for anaphylaxis.

RESULTS

Of the 60,143 pediatric ED presentations during the study period, 1551 allergy-related presentations were identified and reviewed. 187 met consensus criteria for anaphylaxis, and another 24 were diagnosed with anaphylaxis without meeting criteria. Of the 211 presentations, 105 cases were given an ED diagnosis of anaphylaxis and 106 cases were given an alternative diagnosis in ED. Those diagnosed with anaphylaxis were more likely to receive epinephrine [85.7% vs 31.1% (OR = 13.27, 95% CI: 6.09-26.3)], to be observed for the recommended four hours [56.2% vs 29.2% (OR = 3.10, 95% CI 1.76-5.48, p < 0.001)], to have an epinephrine autoinjector available on discharge [81.9% vs 35.8% (OR = 4.12, 95% CI 2.07-8.22, p < 0.001)] and to be referred to an allergist [35.2% vs 16.0% (OR = 2.85, 95% CI 1.48-5.49, p < 0.01)]. Provision of anaphylaxis action plans and allergen avoidance advice was poorly documented for all patients.

CONCLUSION

Accurate diagnosis of anaphylaxis in ED has a significant impact on observation times, prescription of epinephrine autoinjectors and referral to an allergist. These factors are key to reducing mortality and the significant morbidity that results from childhood anaphylaxis.

摘要

背景

儿童过敏反应在急诊科常被误诊。我们旨在确定急诊科对儿童过敏反应的误诊对其管理和后续随访的影响。

方法

回顾性查阅2014年澳大利亚墨尔本三家急诊科对0至18岁有过敏症状儿童的急诊科管理记录。如果记录了急诊科对过敏反应的诊断,或临床表现符合过敏反应的国际共识标准,则纳入病例。

结果

在研究期间的60143例儿科急诊科就诊病例中,识别并审查了1551例与过敏相关的就诊病例。187例符合过敏反应的共识标准,另有24例虽未达标准但被诊断为过敏反应。在这211例就诊病例中,105例在急诊科被诊断为过敏反应,106例在急诊科被给予其他诊断。被诊断为过敏反应的患者更有可能接受肾上腺素治疗[85.7%对31.1%(比值比=13.27,95%置信区间:6.09 - 26.3)],按推荐观察4小时[56.2%对29.2%(比值比=3.10,95%置信区间1.76 - 5.48,p<0.001)],出院时配备肾上腺素自动注射器[81.9%对35.8%(比值比=4.12,95%置信区间2.07 - 8.22,p<0.001)],并被转诊至过敏症专科医生处[35.2%对16.0%(比值比=2.85,95%置信区间1.48 - 5.49,p<0.01)]。所有患者的过敏反应行动计划和避免接触过敏原建议的记录都很差。

结论

急诊科对过敏反应的准确诊断对观察时间、肾上腺素自动注射器的处方以及转诊至过敏症专科医生有重大影响。这些因素是降低儿童过敏反应所致死亡率和严重发病率的关键。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/ab7c/5803891/f658a514d0f0/12887_2018_1024_Fig1_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/ab7c/5803891/f658a514d0f0/12887_2018_1024_Fig1_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/ab7c/5803891/f658a514d0f0/12887_2018_1024_Fig1_HTML.jpg

相似文献

1
Downstream consequences of diagnostic error in pediatric anaphylaxis.小儿过敏反应诊断错误的下游后果。
BMC Pediatr. 2018 Feb 7;18(1):40. doi: 10.1186/s12887-018-1024-z.
2
Inaccurate diagnosis of paediatric anaphylaxis in three Australian Emergency Departments.澳大利亚三个急诊科对儿童过敏反应的误诊情况。
J Paediatr Child Health. 2017 Jul;53(7):698-704. doi: 10.1111/jpc.13483. Epub 2017 Feb 3.
3
Retrospective study of drug-induced anaphylaxis treated in the emergency department or hospital: patient characteristics, management, and 1-year follow-up.回顾性研究在急诊科或医院治疗的药物性过敏反应:患者特征、处理方法和 1 年随访。
J Allergy Clin Immunol Pract. 2014 Jan-Feb;2(1):46-51. doi: 10.1016/j.jaip.2013.08.012. Epub 2013 Oct 23.
4
An analysis of anaphylaxis cases at a single pediatric emergency department during a 1-year period.对某儿科急诊部一年内发生的过敏反应病例进行分析。
Ann Allergy Asthma Immunol. 2017 Apr;118(4):461-464. doi: 10.1016/j.anai.2017.02.002.
5
Anaphylaxis in the Pediatric Emergency Department: Analysis of 133 Cases After an Allergy Workup.儿科急诊中的过敏反应:过敏检查后的 133 例分析。
J Allergy Clin Immunol Pract. 2017 Sep-Oct;5(5):1256-1263. doi: 10.1016/j.jaip.2017.02.011. Epub 2017 Apr 25.
6
Pitfalls in anaphylaxis diagnosis and management at a university emergency department.大学急诊科过敏反应诊断与管理中的陷阱
Allergy Asthma Proc. 2018 Jul 1;39(4):316-321. doi: 10.2500/aap.2018.39.4144.
7
Anaphylaxis management in the pediatric emergency department: opportunities for improvement.儿科急诊科的过敏反应管理:改进的机会
Pediatr Emerg Care. 2010 Feb;26(2):71-6. doi: 10.1097/PEC.0b013e3181ce2e1c.
8
Temporal Trends in Epinephrine Dispensing and Allergy/Immunology Follow-up Among Emergency Department Anaphylaxis Patients in the United States, 2005-2014.美国 2005-2014 年急诊过敏反应患者肾上腺素给药和过敏/免疫学随访的时间趋势。
J Allergy Clin Immunol Pract. 2017 Sep-Oct;5(5):1272-1279.e1. doi: 10.1016/j.jaip.2017.06.009. Epub 2017 Jul 26.
9
Pediatric Anaphylaxis in the Emergency Department: Clinical Presentation, Quality of Care, and Reliability of Consensus Criteria.急诊科儿童过敏反应:临床表现、护理质量及共识标准的可靠性
Pediatr Emerg Care. 2019 Jan;35(1):28-31. doi: 10.1097/PEC.0000000000001136.
10
Trends in the diagnosis and management of anaphylaxis in a tertiary care pediatric emergency department.三级儿童急救病房中过敏反应的诊断和管理趋势。
Ann Allergy Asthma Immunol. 2018 Sep;121(3):348-352. doi: 10.1016/j.anai.2018.06.033. Epub 2018 Jul 4.

引用本文的文献

1
Investigating health care pathways for anaphylaxis: Seeing the bigger picture through linked data.探究过敏反应的医疗保健途径:通过关联数据洞察全局。
J Allergy Clin Immunol Glob. 2024 Nov 13;4(1):100371. doi: 10.1016/j.jacig.2024.100371. eCollection 2025 Feb.
2
Diagnostic Accuracy of Tryptase Levels for Pediatric Anaphylaxis: A Case-Control Study.小儿过敏反应中类胰蛋白酶水平的诊断准确性:一项病例对照研究。
Int Arch Allergy Immunol. 2025;186(4):311-318. doi: 10.1159/000541883. Epub 2024 Oct 30.
3
Drug-Induced Anaphylaxis in Children.

本文引用的文献

1
Inaccurate diagnosis of paediatric anaphylaxis in three Australian Emergency Departments.澳大利亚三个急诊科对儿童过敏反应的误诊情况。
J Paediatr Child Health. 2017 Jul;53(7):698-704. doi: 10.1111/jpc.13483. Epub 2017 Feb 3.
2
Evaluation of Anaphylaxis Management in a Pediatric Emergency Department.儿科急诊科过敏反应管理的评估
Pediatr Emerg Care. 2016 Aug;32(8):508-13. doi: 10.1097/PEC.0000000000000864.
3
The diagnosis and management of children presenting with anaphylaxis to a metropolitan emergency department: A 2-year retrospective case series.
儿童药物性过敏反应
Biomedicines. 2024 Feb 27;12(3):527. doi: 10.3390/biomedicines12030527.
4
Level of knowledge among healthcare professionals regarding anaphylaxis.医疗保健专业人员对过敏反应的认知水平。
Asia Pac Allergy. 2022 Oct 27;12(4):e41. doi: 10.5415/apallergy.2022.12.e41. eCollection 2022 Oct.
5
Missed Registration of Disease Codes for Pediatric Anaphylaxis at the Emergency Department.急诊科儿童过敏反应疾病编码的漏报情况。
Emerg Med Int. 2019 Aug 14;2019:4198630. doi: 10.1155/2019/4198630. eCollection 2019.
6
Underuse of Epinephrine for Pediatric Anaphylaxis Victims in the Emergency Department: A Population-based Study.急诊科儿科过敏反应患者肾上腺素使用不足:一项基于人群的研究。
Allergy Asthma Immunol Res. 2019 Jul;11(4):529-537. doi: 10.4168/aair.2019.11.4.529.
大城市急诊科出现过敏反应儿童的诊断与管理:一项为期2年的回顾性病例系列研究
J Paediatr Child Health. 2016 May;52(5):487-92. doi: 10.1111/jpc.13173.
4
Anaphylaxis audit in a busy metropolitan Emergency Department: a review of real life management compared to best practice.繁忙都市急诊科的过敏反应审核:与最佳实践相比的现实管理回顾
Asia Pac Allergy. 2016 Jan;6(1):29-34. doi: 10.5415/apallergy.2016.6.1.29. Epub 2016 Jan 27.
5
Pediatric anaphylaxis: triggers, clinical features, and treatment in a tertiary-care hospital.儿科过敏反应:三级医疗医院中的触发因素、临床特征及治疗
Asian Pac J Allergy Immunol. 2015 Dec;33(4):281-8. doi: 10.12932/AP0610.33.4.2015.
6
2015 update of the evidence base: World Allergy Organization anaphylaxis guidelines.循证医学基础的2015年更新:世界过敏组织过敏反应指南。
World Allergy Organ J. 2015 Oct 28;8(1):32. doi: 10.1186/s40413-015-0080-1. eCollection 2015.
7
Time trends in Australian hospital anaphylaxis admissions in 1998-1999 to 2011-2012.1998-1999 年至 2011-2012 年澳大利亚医院过敏反应住院人数的时间趋势。
J Allergy Clin Immunol. 2015 Aug;136(2):367-75. doi: 10.1016/j.jaci.2015.05.009. Epub 2015 Jul 14.
8
Epidemiology and clinical predictors of biphasic reactions in children with anaphylaxis.过敏反应儿童双相反应的流行病学及临床预测因素
Ann Allergy Asthma Immunol. 2015 Sep;115(3):217-223.e2. doi: 10.1016/j.anai.2015.05.013. Epub 2015 Jun 22.
9
Anaphylaxis management before and after implementation of guidelines in the pediatric emergency department.儿科急诊科实施指南前后的过敏反应管理
J Allergy Clin Immunol Pract. 2015 Jul-Aug;3(4):604-6.e2. doi: 10.1016/j.jaip.2015.01.021. Epub 2015 Mar 7.
10
Does anaphylaxis masquerade as asthma in children?儿童中过敏性反应会伪装成哮喘吗?
Emerg Med J. 2015 Jan;32(1):83-4. doi: 10.1136/emermed-2014-203603. Epub 2014 Sep 24.