Department of Orthopaedics, RuiHua Orthopaedic Hospital of Suzhou, 5, Tayun Road, Wuzhong, 215000, Jiangsu Province, People's Republic of China.
Int Orthop. 2021 Sep;45(9):2365-2373. doi: 10.1007/s00264-021-05164-5. Epub 2021 Aug 1.
The purpose of this study was to compare the clinical outcomes of intra-articular calcaneal fractures with medial column displacement treated with different surgical techniques, namely extensile lateral approach (ELA) or sinus tarsi approach (STA), combined with percutaneous medial reduction.
Ninety-six patients with intra-articular calcaneal fractures who were subjected to ELA or STA (45 in STA group and 51 in ELA group) were retrospectively assessed. Reduction of the posterior facet, calcaneal body, Böhler's angle, and Gissane's angle were evaluated. Clinical outcomes were evaluated using the American Orthopaedic Foot and Ankle Society (AOFAS) score and visual analog scale (VAS). The complications, time to surgery, operative time, and blood loss were also assessed.
Incidence of wound complications, post-operative blood drainage, and time to the operation were significantly different between the two groups. There was no significant difference in the recovery of calcaneal anatomy and articular surface between the two groups. Similarly, no difference was detected in Böhler's and Gissane's angles between ELA and STA groups (P > 0.05). Finally, there was no difference in AOFAS and VAS scores between the two groups at the final follow-up (P > 0.05).
STA resulted in favourable radiological and clinical results with fewer wound complications and a shorter waiting time when compared to ELA. The percutaneous medial reduction technique is effective in reducing medial column displacement.
本研究旨在比较采用不同手术技术(即外侧扩展入路(ELA)或跗骨窦入路(STA)联合经皮内侧复位)治疗伴有内侧柱移位的关节内跟骨骨折的临床疗效。
回顾性评估了 96 例接受 ELA 或 STA(STA 组 45 例,ELA 组 51 例)治疗的关节内跟骨骨折患者。评估了后关节面、跟骨体、Böhler 角和 Gissane 角的复位情况。采用美国矫形足踝协会(AOFAS)评分和视觉模拟评分(VAS)评估临床疗效。还评估了并发症、手术时间、手术时间和失血量。
两组患者的伤口并发症发生率、术后引流情况和手术时间均有显著差异。两组在跟骨解剖和关节面恢复方面无显著差异。同样,ELA 和 STA 组之间的 Böhler 角和 Gissane 角也无差异(P>0.05)。最后,两组在最终随访时的 AOFAS 和 VAS 评分无差异(P>0.05)。
与 ELA 相比,STA 可减少伤口并发症和等待时间,获得更好的影像学和临床结果。经皮内侧复位技术可有效减少内侧柱移位。