Suppr超能文献

德国阻塞性睡眠呼吸暂停上气道刺激术上市后研究的长期随访

Long-term follow-up of the German post-market study for upper airway stimulation for obstructive sleep apnea.

作者信息

Steffen Armin, Sommer Ulrich J, Maurer Joachim T, Abrams Nils, Hofauer Benedikt, Heiser Clemens

机构信息

Department of Otorhinolaryngology, University of Lübeck, Klinik für HNO-Heilkunde, Ratzeburger Allee 160, 23538, Lübeck, Germany.

Department of Otorhinolaryngology, Head and Neck Surgery, Helios University Hospital Wuppertal, University Witten/Herdecke, Wuppertal, Germany.

出版信息

Sleep Breath. 2020 Sep;24(3):979-984. doi: 10.1007/s11325-019-01933-0. Epub 2019 Sep 4.

Abstract

PURPOSE

Upper airway stimulation (UAS) is an effective treatment for obstructive sleep apnea (OSA) in positive airway pressure (PAP) failure. Most reports have presented short-term data, so long-term safety and efficacy reports are rare. The German post-market study (G-PMS) has followed approximately 60 patients from three implanting centers for several years.

METHODS

Patients with OSA and PAP failure qualified for the G-PMS by the absence of obesity class 2 an AHI between 15 and 65 events/h and absence of complete concentric collapse at the velum during drug-induced sleep endoscopy. Optional 2- and 3-year follow-ups after implantation were collected during routine clinical practice. We measured respiratory parameters such as apnea-hypopnea index (AHI) and oxygen desaturation index (ODI) and daytime sleepiness using the Epworth sleepiness scale (ESS) in a per protocol analysis. Usage was calculated from device-downloaded reports. Device-related complications were documented.

RESULTS

Of the 60 original patients, 41 returned for 2-year follow-up, and 38 for 3 years. About 76% at 2 years and 68% at 3 years met the criterion of therapy success defined as an AHI below 15/h. The median AHI was reduced from 28.6/h (baseline) to 9.0/h (2 years) and 10.0/h (3 years); whereas median ODI decreased from 27.0 to 6.3/h (2 years), and 8.3/h (3 years). Median ESS improved from baseline 13 points to 4 (2 years) and 6 (3 years). Usage was stable at approximately 45 h per week at 2 and 3 years. Serious device-related adverse events were rare, with two-device explantation between 12 to 36 months postoperatively.

CONCLUSIONS

The German multi-center long-term outcomes compare favorably with previously published studies. Respiratory and sleepiness efficacy outcomes were sustained over 2 and 3 years, with a favorable safety profile, supporting the safety and efficacy of a chronic implantable therapy.

摘要

目的

上气道刺激(UAS)是治疗气道正压通气(PAP)失败的阻塞性睡眠呼吸暂停(OSA)的一种有效方法。大多数报告提供的是短期数据,因此长期安全性和疗效报告较为罕见。德国上市后研究(G-PMS)对来自三个植入中心的约60例患者进行了数年的随访。

方法

患有OSA且PAP治疗失败的患者若符合以下条件则纳入G-PMS:无2级肥胖,呼吸暂停低通气指数(AHI)在15至65次/小时之间,且在药物诱导睡眠内镜检查时软腭无完全同心塌陷。在常规临床实践中收集植入后可选的2年和3年随访数据。在符合方案分析中,我们使用Epworth嗜睡量表(ESS)测量呼吸参数,如呼吸暂停低通气指数(AHI)、氧饱和度下降指数(ODI)和日间嗜睡情况。使用情况根据设备下载报告计算得出。记录与设备相关的并发症。

结果

60例初始患者中,41例返回进行2年随访,38例进行3年随访。2年时约76%、3年时约68%的患者达到治疗成功标准,即AHI低于15次/小时。AHI中位数从28.6次/小时(基线)降至9.0次/小时(2年)和10.0次/小时(3年);而ODI中位数从27.0降至6.3次/小时(2年)和8.3次/小时(3年)。ESS中位数从基线的13分改善至4分(2年)和6分(3年)。2年和3年时使用时间稳定在每周约45小时。与设备相关的严重不良事件罕见,术后12至36个月有两例设备取出。

结论

德国多中心长期结果与先前发表的研究相比更具优势。呼吸和嗜睡疗效结果在2年和3年期间持续存在,安全性良好,支持了慢性可植入治疗的安全性和有效性。

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验